ASU Online runs 7.5-week Session A and Session B courses, modules landing fast and grades posting faster. This board files samples the same way: course by course, module by module, on the session clock. Search yours, see the deliverable in real form, or request a custom sample free and have it in 24 to 48 hours.
The RN-to-BSN ten-course sequence first, the MS lanes and DNP after. Open a course to see its seven modules on the session clock.
The evidence engine: studies appraised, translation argued, module by module.
NUR 464The BSN finale: your whole sequence integrated into one demonstration.
NUR 440Community assessment on real local data, rates read honestly.
NUR 391Theory applied, not recited: frameworks put to work on practice.
NUR 392Promotion written across ages with the lifespan lens held.
NUR 444Innovation argued as discipline: mechanisms and metrics, not sparkle.
NUR 445Management written for nurses stepping toward the desk.
NUR 460The reflective course: genuine specificity connected to scholarship.
NUR 495The global lens: systems compared, equity written with precision.
NUR 502Assessment at graduate depth: reasoning legible in documentation form.
NUR 509The prevention practicum: hours yours, paperwork tidy.
NUR 544Graduate theory with application teeth.
NUR 579The educator practicum: teaching yours, the orbit ours.
NUR 593The MS finale: a staged applied project in improvement-science register.
DNP 602Doctoral evidence appraisal: translation logic made explicit.
DNP 601Theory is the part of the doctoral core that professionals most often treat as decoration.
DNP 603Health equity papers fail on evidence more often than on conviction.
DNP 604Pathophysiology at doctoral level is graded on the link, not the recall.
DNP 605A history that says one thing and an examination that says another sinks a doctoral write-up faster than a missed finding.
DNP 608A drug name is not a decision.
DNP 609A role paper that lists what the title means has not made an argument yet.
DNP 610DNP 610 is where emergency reasoning becomes writing: a composite patient arrives, and you have to show the thinking that got to a decision.
DNP 613DNP 613 is preventive care written as clinical argument: who gets screened, starting when, how often, and on what evidence.
DNP 615DNP 615 moves from keeping a patient well to treating what she actually came in with.
DNP 617DNP 617 is the course where one patient carries four diagnoses at once and the plan has to hold all of them.
DNP 619DNP 619 puts a sick child in front of you and asks what you would do in the next hour.
DNP 623DNP 623 asks a harder prevention question than the usual one: not only who should be screened, but who should stop.
NUR 501NUR 501 is where nursing writing stops describing care and starts arguing for change.
NUR 503NUR 503 asks you to hold three things in one sentence: what the exam shows, what the body is doing, and what the drug is for.
NUR 521NUR 521 is the course where nursing evidence meets the data a hospital already has.
NUR 545NUR 545 turns drug knowledge into written argument, which is a harder move than most students expect.
NUR 547NUR 547 hands you a community instead of a patient, and the writing has to change with it.
NUR 548NUR 548 is the course that asks how you would prove a hospital got safer.
NUR 610NUR 610 asks nurses to read risk that was inherited rather than acquired, and then to say what it means for more than one person.
NUR 618NUR 618 is where a good idea has to survive contact with legislatures, budgets, and the people who would carry it out.
Four scaffolded papers that turn a practice gap into an evidence-based change.
Seven project-planning assignments that turn an EBP question into a DNP project plan.
Eight dissemination assignments that carry a finished DNP project to its audiences.
Ten leadership and innovation assignments, from a vision statement to a team case for innovation.
Four scaffolded writing papers, from précis to argument, in APA 7th edition style.
Nine culture assignments, from a photo diary of artifacts to a model for culture change.
Eight information and technology assignments, from an AI discussion to a workflow redesign charter.
Eight leadership assignments, from a peer’s leadership story to a DNP project poster.
Five ethics assignments, from a moral compass narrative to a final portfolio on ethical practice in action.
Five systems assignments, from an interprofessional case to three versions of a systems map and a reflection paper.
Eight policy assignments on one topic, from a story-led blog post to a white paper and legislative testimony.
Seven teamwork assignments, from a MindMap of coordination and collaboration to a scalable transdisciplinary care model.
Five research assignments on one clinical question, from a PICO(T) worksheet to two critical appraisals and a summary PowerPoint.
Six senior capstone assignments, from a leadership style reflection to a narrated EBP presentation.
Ten assignments on one health care issue, from a group presentation to an individual innovation paper and poster.
Four senior assignments, from an AI prioritization exercise to a bioethics presentation and a group paper on leading change.
Five community health assignments on one vulnerable population, from a team charter to an innovative intervention presentation.
Three written assignments on common problems in older adults: two clinical vignette boards and a group assessment protocol.
Ten community care assignments built around one vulnerable population, from a team charter to an interprofessional observation.
Four group presentations, on clinical safety, a professional organization, a quality change and a domain of the Essentials.
One written assignment, a health policy reflection and letter to a legislator, in a course built mostly on exams and public health modules.
Six written assignments on the neuroscience of mental illness, from psychoneuroimmunology to an article summary on PTSD and the brain.
Ten weekly discussions on psychiatric interviewing, from a diagnostic case with cultural questions to motivational interviewing with teens.
Three written assignments on common mental health disorders, from an autism reflection to an evidence-based paper that tests what an AI tool says.
Three written assignments on complex family and chronic mental health care, from a vulnerable family review to a five-generation genogram.
Six written assignments on mental health promotion, from risk and protective factors to week-long activity and sleep reflections.
Six written assignments on psychiatric prescribing, from stimulants versus non-stimulants to a paired case presentation on tardive dyskinesia.
Seven written assignments in pediatric acute care, from three faculty-style case studies to a flipped classroom talk on pediatric ARDS.
Three written assignments in pediatric prescribing, from an OTC medication PowerPoint to checking an AI treatment plan.
Three physiology case studies, from cystic fibrosis at the cell level to the newborn’s circulatory transition.
Six analytical checkpoints and an exit reflection on curriculum design, from what drives priorities to how educators know a curriculum works.
Three discussion boards and all four parts of the instructional unit portfolio, from learner analysis to a microlesson and its evaluation.
The three-part learning plan, the presence and EdTech escape room and the peer review of a draft online course, all for one composite course.
Seven written assignments on professional nursing, from an interprofessional self-assessment to a trauma-informed care video and a workplace ethics paper.
Seven weekly assignments on knowledge, judgment and evidence, from a metaparadigm essay to a mini research proposal and a policy platform.
Three SPSS analysis assignments and a challenging-concept board, from t-tests and one-way ANOVA to correlation and simple regression.
Five written statistics assignments and two paper critiques, from descriptive statistics to a logistic regression critique.
Two case study discussion boards, one neurological and one on HIV prevention and gender-inclusive care.
Two clinical vignette boards and a group cancer protocol for adult-gerontology nurse practitioners.
One group case presentation on a common acute condition, delivered at the second immersion.
A written pediatric history, a comprehensive SOAP note, a group abnormal-findings case and a problem-focused note.
Five age-based case studies and a paired presentation on a developmental or behavioral concern.
Five hosted case studies and an evidence-based practice presentation on a guideline departure.
Four hosted case studies on chronic conditions and a presentation on a guideline departure.
An assessment portfolio, two evaluation case studies and two papers for future nurse educators.
A theorist presentation, a clinical judgment care plan, two reflections and a group teaching plan.
A role paper on trends in nursing science and the slide deck that summarizes it.
A synthesis paper on mindset and research, with a slide deck that summarizes it.
A qualitative study built in two papers, plus an observation exercise and a closing reflection.
Two reflections and plans, two mind maps and two team presentations on innovation in health care.
Four research critiques and a career trajectory plan for the final PhD role seminar.
A full literature review built in stages: search, evidence table, manuscript and poster.
A news analysis, a payment model assignment and a research presentation on the U.S. health care system.
A health policy analysis built in stages, from problem statement to recorded presentation.
A team charter, a comparative health system paper and a design-your-own-system presentation.
Four essays on finding, appraising and reviewing health research, all built around one question about community health workers.
Five writing workshops and the cumulative paper they build, followed here on one condition: measles in the United States.
Two scenario papers on the newest delivery trends: telemedicine across state lines and wearables in primary care.
The final project outline and paper on a transformation and leadership challenge, sampled on physician burnout.
The Collective Research Approach Project, sampled on two famous studies of hormone therapy that disagreed.
The Final Summative Case Study, sampled on the economics of insulin prices in the United States.
The individual article analysis, sampled on a medical informatics study of alert fatigue.
Two applied ethics papers, from personal values to shared principles and an ethics case shaped by inequality.
Three applied assignments on the U.S. system and its careers: a stakeholder map, a career comparison and a technology infographic.
The four-part health equity campaign, built here as Cut and Check, a barbershop blood pressure campaign for Black men.
Two compliance writing assignments: a licensure work plan and a mock misconduct investigation.
Five rapid critical appraisals and a group EBP project on home blood pressure telemonitoring, from outline to final paper.
Four papers on clinical research, from the NIH website and an FDA enforcement case to the IND and research compliance programs.
The Transformation Paper, sampled as a health equity critique of the HHS Disparities Action Plan for a health department director.
The four-part health communication campaign project, sampled on health insurance literacy for ASU students.
Six short papers on care coordination, including a two-part evolving case following one patient after readmission.
Two professional role papers for future care coordinators: leadership versus management and the stages of a real workplace conflict.
Two team policy papers: the history of U.S. insurance and reform, and what the Affordable Care Act changed for coordination.
The capstone’s written pieces on one coordination issue: an annotated bibliography, a quantitative research critique and the final solution paper.
The values and personalities team paper, on role models, values clarity and shared values in health care leadership.
The Final Capstone, sampled as a community health needs assessment of Yuma County, Arizona.
All four writing assignments, sampled: an OIG element review, a 2026 OIG case, an OSHA incident report and a 2026 HIPAA resolution agreement.
The social support paper, the campaign preparation assignment and the final campaign paper, sampled on stroke recognition.
Five of the eight risk assessment assignments, sampled for one hospital, clinic and surgery center system.
The SOP breakdown, the quality management plan and the pulled-from-market paper, sampled.
All five papers, sampled: drug development, a two-drug risk-benefit analysis, safety monitoring, globalization and a pharmacogenomic risk plan.
All three papers, sampled: a design analysis, a sample size calculation and a multiregional trial with protocol abstract.
The IRB conditional approval response and the FDA warning letter response, sampled.
The staff ethics slides and the essay on vulnerable populations, sampled.
All three parts of the Week 4 exercise, sampled: Common Rule changes, a narrated application deck and human versus animal research rules.
All three individual papers, sampled: a target product profile, a recent recall and a U.S. and EU comparison table.
All three written assignments, sampled: Japan device registration slides, a quality essay and an annotated bibliography on decentralized trials.
Paper 1, the critique of future developments in global therapeutics, sampled.
Six assignments, sampled: a translational study, an IACUC review, a Phase 0 dissection, an annotated bibliography, a protocol deck and an ethics paper.
The CAPA writing assignment and the final risk-based monitoring paper, sampled.
The Summative Evaluation Paper on emerging food safety issues, sampled.
The Food Safety Individual Project Paper, sampled on assessing manager certification and active managerial control.
Three of five assignments, sampled: a coverage analysis, a contract redline memo and a budget negotiation plan.
The capstone proposal, literature review and final paper, sampled on age limits in heart failure trials.
The proposal, annotated bibliography, introduction and background and final paper, sampled on results-reporting timeliness.
Seven pieces of one program plan, from county data to the final plan, built around sleep and heart health in Pinal County.
Every section of one evaluation plan, built for a walking program for older adults with arthritis.
The op-ed, the policy brief plan, the first draft and the final brief, built on indoor heat deaths in Maricopa County.
The descriptive case study, both article reviews and the data analysis report, each built on real data or landmark studies.
Six stages of one community assessment, from the rationale to the presentation, on food insecurity in Yuma County.
Both artifact presentations, a program budget and a stakeholder and meeting plan, built for a fall-prevention program.
Three "in the wild" analyses and the ChatGPT project, on real campaigns from Tips to The Real Cost.
Both case studies, a malpractice analysis and a Stark and Anti-Kickback analysis, worked on illustrative fact patterns.
Both article assessments, the evidentiary review table and the final research report, built on loneliness in homebound older adults.
The agency field reflection and the geriatric syndrome presentation, on adult day care and delirium.
The 8-page Nomadland paper on diversity, theory, justice and ethics in later life.
The 750-word intergenerational case study summary, on Experience Corps and Japan’s REPRINTS.
The field interview and the 8-page innovation paper, on assisted living and the Care Transitions Intervention.
The Understanding Aging paper and the case study, on art, life review and elder neglect.
The policy issue paper, the political parties paper and the narrated presentation, on safe nurse staffing.
The interview assignment and the ethical will, on health histories and passing on values.
The social determinants worksheet and the cultural practices presentation, on Pima County and Diné health.
Five essays, from personal strengths to teamwork, on evidence, naloxone policy and telehealth.
The realism paper, the cultural views presentation, the Eastern and Western medicine paper and the final philosophy of health.
The policy analysis, the negotiation proposal and the final policy presentation, on nurse practitioner practice authority.
The waste-reduction paper and the final greener tomorrow presentation, on anesthetic gases and reusables.
Five one-page Theory Expert Briefs and the Systems Integration Brief, one level of the Social Ecological Model at a time.
The outline and the final paper of the four-part ethical analysis, on pig kidney transplants in living patients.
Four weekly reflections and the final paper, from the Flexner Report to care at the end of life.
Three papers on simulation theory, design and reflection, from the Jeffries theory to a sepsis scenario.
A needs assessment, a measurement presentation, an educator evaluation and the final project.
A needs assessment, SWOT, budget and ROI pitch for one hypothetical hospital simulation center.
Three essays: the field’s history, its theoretical frameworks and the psychosocial skills that matter most.
A health literacy brochure revision and the informed consent research paper.
The 300-point Crisis Action Plan, five interventions in a slide from bad to worse.
The intercultural interview paper and the cultural immersion paper, analyzed with Hofstede and Hall.
The Final Dream Team Paper, five research-backed lessons on being a better teammate and leader.
The Assessment Paper and the Intervention and Treatment Plan Paper on one late-life depression case.
An advocacy reflection, an interview analysis and a policy paper on aging policy.
The case presentation and the population health management plan, both from integrated primary care.
The logic model and the written evaluation plan for one illustrative family program.
Ten linked papers that build one quality improvement proposal, from SBAR to budget.
An ethics case study and essay from field placement, a voucher policy analysis and a one-page fact sheet.
The one-page harm reduction program rationale, built for a Phoenix neighborhood.
An advance directive script, an international model presentation and three palliative care case studies.
The evaluation table and the executive voiceover pitch for one evidence-based practice question.
Type the code and module, NUR 318 Module 4, NUR 464 module 2, or browse the board. The search understands ASU's spacing either way.
Papers in APA submission form, discussions as posts, capstone phases assembling from a real record. What done looks like on a 7.5-week clock.
Send the course, the module, and the rubric from Canvas. A nurse-writer matched to your course drafts a fresh sample in 24 to 48 hours; the first one costs nothing.
Course code, module number, and anything the rubric demands. A writer matched to your course drafts a fresh sample, correctly formatted, delivered to your personal email in 24 to 48 hours. No card, no catch on the first one.
Confidential. ASU never hears from us; samples are study models you learn from and write your own way. Proctored checks stay prep-only, always.