NUR 673 Producing and Evaluating Programs for Academic and Practice Settings sample papers, module by module

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN · Producing and Evaluating Programs for Academic and Practice Settings · Arizona State University · Free custom samples in 24–48h

NUR 673 teaches nurse educators to assess learners and evaluate courses and programs, from test blueprints and item writing to accreditation standards. The samples here follow one composite BSN faculty member through every written assignment: the meaningful assessment paper, all four parts of the assessment portfolio built on one unit, the course and program evaluation case studies and the closing reflection. Each module page carries a full sample built to the posted syllabus.

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. NUR 673 is ASU’s Producing and Evaluating Programs for Academic and Practice Settings course. NUR 673 is the assessment and evaluation course in ASU’s online MS in Nursing nurse educator track, covering valid and reliable testing, written assignments and rubrics, item analysis, course and curriculum evaluation and program evaluation against accreditation and regulatory standards. Searches like "nur 673 module 3 assignment example", "NUR673 sample paper", and "NUR 673 module samples" land on this page.

What NUR 673 is really about

The 7.5-week course moves from the foundations of assessment and evaluation through three weeks of designing valid and reliable assessments and a week of test construction and analysis to course, curriculum and program evaluation and a closing reflection.

Graded work is a four-part assessment portfolio (test blueprint, test questions, written assignment and rubric, peer review), two evaluation case studies, two papers and an item analysis quiz, with Oermann, Gaberson and De Gagne’s Evaluation and Testing in Nursing Education as the main text.

What NUR 673’s assessments ask for

The posted syllabus totals 100 points: test questions 25, test blueprint 10, written assignment and rubric 10, peer review 10, the two case studies 10 each, the two papers 10 each and the item analysis quiz 5.

Where students lose points in NUR 673

Points slip when blueprints do not total correctly or sit mostly at recall, when items break basic writing rules, when rubric levels differ only in adjectives, when evaluation data are reported without interpretation and when accreditation standards are named but not applied.

The NUR 673 drawers

Module 1

NUR 673 Module 1 assignment example

Meaningful assessment paper: a composite first-year faculty member teaching adult health in a BSN program argues that assessment is meaningful when it is aligned with outcomes, valid and reliable enough for the decisions it supports, fair to all learners, used formatively as well as summatively and built to show clinical judgment, and tests her own unit exam against those standards. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 2

NUR 673 Module 2 assignment example

Test blueprint: the composite BSN faculty member plans a 15-item unit quiz on fluid, electrolyte and acid-base imbalances, stating the course and unit outcomes, weighting five content areas by importance and teaching time, distributing items across understanding, application and analysis, mapping analysis items to the NCSBN clinical judgment steps and choosing item formats. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 3

NUR 673 Module 3 assignment example

Peer review of test questions: the composite BSN faculty member reviews a classmate's five draft items on diabetes management, praising a strong clinical stem, then naming flaws with the evidence behind each (a negative stem without emphasis, an all-of-the-above option, a longest-answer cue, an implausible distractor and two correct answers in a single-best-answer item), with a revision for each and a response post on her own items' feedback. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 4

NUR 673 Module 4 assignment example

Written assignment and rubric: the composite BSN faculty member designs a two-page clinical reasoning brief on an older adult with hyponatremia, aligned with her unit outcome on analyzing data to prioritize care, with student instructions, the outcome, domain and level, and a four-criterion analytic rubric at four performance levels with points and descriptors that separate each level. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 5

NUR 673 Module 5 assignment example

Final test questions: the composite BSN faculty member writes all 15 items of her fluid, electrolyte and acid-base quiz to the Part 1 blueprint, with eleven single-best-answer items, three select-all-that-apply items and one extended case item, each with its key, rationale, content area, cognitive level and clinical judgment step, plus a note on revisions made after peer review. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 6

NUR 673 Module 6 assignment example

Course evaluation case study: the composite faculty member analyzes a composite adult health course's data (student ratings, exam item statistics, standardized test results, clinical partner feedback and course pass rates), weighs stakeholder views and emerging trends such as clinical judgment testing and generative AI, and proposes four prioritized course-level changes with how each will be evaluated. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 7

NUR 673 Module 7 assignment example

Program evaluation case study: the composite faculty member evaluates a composite BSN program whose first-time licensure pass rate fell to 76%, applying CCNE accreditation expectations for pass, completion and employment rates, state board of nursing approval requirements and the AACN Essentials, organizing the review with the CIPP model and proposing a corrective plan with timelines. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Module 8

NUR 673 Module 8 assignment example

Reflection on learning: the composite BSN faculty member reflects on how her view of assessment changed across the course, from grading as the end of teaching to assessment as evidence for decisions, describing three turning points (her blueprint audit, peer review of her items and the course evaluation case) and three commitments for her next term as a nurse educator. Full sample paper, read it free.

Read the sample →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Arizona State University revises courses; module counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a NUR 673 sample the right way

Read a NUR 673 sample to see how each portfolio part answers to the one before. Your own blueprint, items and rubric must come from a course you teach or plan to teach.

How these samples are written

The NUR 673 samples follow one composite faculty member and one unit so the portfolio parts connect, and they cite the course text, item-writing research, accreditation standards and the NCSBN clinical judgment model. Send your own unit or case for a sample built around it.

NUR 673 questions, answered

How is NUR 673 graded?

One hundred points: the four portfolio parts carry 55, two case studies 20, two papers 20 and an item analysis quiz 5.

What is the NUR 673 assessment portfolio?

A test blueprint, test questions written to it, a written assignment with a rubric and a peer review of a classmate’s questions.

Does NUR 673 allow AI tools?

The syllabus permits some generative AI uses, such as brainstorming and revising, but students must disclose and cite any use.