NUR 458 Module 5 Problem Prioritization and Interventions Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This NUR 458 Module 5 sample is the Problem Prioritization in Community Care and Collaboration, which ASU BSN seniors complete in their community rotation. In ASU NUR 458 this assignment asks teams to rank their population's problems and name specific interventions that could improve outcomes. The composite team scores its four community nursing diagnoses for day laborers at a Phoenix hiring corner on five criteria, including what workers themselves said mattered. Untreated work injuries and injury risk rank highest, so the team combines them into one priority and proposes interventions at the corner: a first-aid and injury-response session, a hazard card in Spanish and English, a referral pathway with the community health center and measures.

CourseNUR 458 Community Care and Collaboration
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeProblem prioritization with interventions
LengthAbout 406 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramBSN in Nursing
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 458 Module 5

1

First Things First at the Corner: Prioritizing Health Problems and Interventions for Day Laborers

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

NUR 458: Community Care and Collaboration

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title signals that the paper makes a choice among problems and commits to a first action, which is what prioritization means.
2

First Things First at the Corner: Prioritizing Health Problems and Interventions for Day Laborers

Prioritization Criteria

The team rated every diagnosis on five criteria, from 1 for low to 3 for high: seriousness of the problem, number of people affected, community concern as expressed by workers, the reach of nursing interventions and support from community partners.

Workers ranked injuries first when the team asked what worried them most. Chronic disease is serious but scored low on community concern, which matters because interventions that do not address what people care about are less likely to be used.

DiagnosisSeriousnessNumber affectedCommunity concernNursing reachPartner supportTotal
Delayed treatment of work injuries3333315
Risk for injury from hazardous work3322313
Ineffective management of hypertension and diabetes3212210
Readiness for enhanced community coping1322311
What this page is doingScoring each diagnosis on stated criteria, including the community's own view, shows how the team made its choice and lets faculty check the reasoning.
3

The Priority

The two injury diagnoses are closely related, so the team combined them into one priority: reducing harm from work injuries among day laborers at the hiring corner. Research backs the choice: injuries are frequent in this work (Seixas et al., 2008), and many injured laborers keep working because a missed day is a lost wage (Walter et al., 2002).

Interventions

1. Injury first-aid and response session at the corner. Two 20-minute sessions on early mornings, led by students with clinical faculty, covering wound care, signs of serious injury, eye injuries and when to seek care, using demonstration rather than handouts.

2. Pocket hazard card. A bilingual card with pictures showing ladder safety, lifting, eye protection and signs of heat illness, plus the clinic's walk-in hours.

3. Referral pathway. With the community health center, a same-day slot for injured workers referred from the corner, and a card that tells the clinic the worker was referred by the program.

4. Building on strengths. Recruit two respected regulars as peer contacts who keep a small first-aid kit and know the referral pathway.

The diagnoses being ranked came from the team's functional health patterns work (Gordon, 1994). ## Partners

The worker center hosts the sessions, the community health center provides the referral slot and a local hardware store has offered first-aid supplies.

Measures

Number of workers attending sessions; number of cards distributed; number of referrals to the clinic in the following month; workers' ability to name two signs of a serious injury after the session.

References

Gordon, M. (1994). Nursing diagnosis: Process and application (3rd ed.). Mosby.

Seixas, N. S., Blecker, H., Camp, J., & Neitzel, R. (2008). Occupational health and safety experience of day laborers in Seattle, WA. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 51(6), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20577

Walter, N., Bourgois, P., Loinaz, H. M., & Schillinger, D. (2002). Social context of work injury among undocumented day laborers in San Francisco. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10501.x

NUR 458 Module 5 instructions, in plain terms

The posted syllabus lists the Problem Prioritization at 2 of 100 points and asks teams to prioritize problems for the chosen population and identify specific health care interventions to improve health outcomes. Format details and the rubric appear in Canvas. Plan to take the community nursing diagnoses from your data analysis, rank them using clear criteria, explain why the top problem came first, and propose specific interventions with partners and measures. Including the community's own view of what matters most strengthens the ranking and makes interventions more likely to be accepted. Your presentations build on this choice, so make the priority and interventions concrete enough to present. Keep interventions realistic for a student team working with community partners over part of a semester.

How this NUR 458 Module 5 example is built

The paper states five prioritization criteria and scores each diagnosis in a table, with totals. A paragraph explains how workers' own ranking shaped the result and why a serious problem with low community concern ranked lower. The two injury diagnoses are combined into one priority, supported by two studies. Four specific interventions follow, including one that builds on a community strength, then the partners who make them possible and four measures. The paper keeps the same diagnosis wording used in the data analysis so the sequence reads as one project. Three sources support it. The scoring is transparent, so another team could reach the same ranking from the same data. Interventions are scaled to what a student team and partners can do.

Where the marks sit in the NUR 458 Module 5 rubric

Prioritization assignments are likely graded on the use of explicit criteria, a defensible ranking, inclusion of the community's perspective, specific and feasible interventions, identified partners and measurable outcomes. Rankings earn credit when the scoring is shown rather than asserted. Interventions should be concrete, saying who does what, where and when. Partners and measures show the plan could actually happen and be evaluated. Linking the priority to evidence strengthens the case. Because the assignment is short, clarity and specificity matter more than length. Rankings that change after asking the community show real engagement. Specific partners and measures make the plan believable.

NUR 458 Module 5 help with common mistakes

A common weakness is ranking problems by what seems most serious to students without asking the community. Include workers' or residents' views. Another is proposing interventions that are too large for a student team, such as building a clinic. Choose actions you could carry out with partners in a few weeks. Name at least one measure for each intervention. If your team would like help scoring and ranking its diagnoses, send the data analysis to the desk. Keep wording consistent with your earlier assignments. Check with your clinical faculty that interventions fit site rules. Show your scoring table to a community contact and ask whether the order makes sense. Keep at least one intervention that builds on a community strength.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 458 and BSN in Nursing sample papers

NUR 458 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 458 Module 5 sample paper?

A full NUR 458 Problem Prioritization sample scoring four community diagnoses for day laborers and proposing interventions, partners and measures is on this page.

How do you prioritize community health problems?

Score each problem on stated criteria such as seriousness, number affected, community concern, nursing reach and partner support, then explain the ranking.

How many points is the NUR 458 prioritization worth?

It is worth 2 points, though the choice it records shapes both presentations.

Why include community concern in prioritization?

Interventions aimed at problems people care about are more likely to be accepted and used.

What interventions help day laborers with work injuries?

Practical first-aid teaching at the hiring site, bilingual hazard cards, a referral pathway to a clinic and peer contacts who keep supplies.