DNP 705 Module 7 DNP Project Sustainability Plan Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This DNP 705 Module 7 sample is the sustainability plan in Health Care Outcomes Management at ASU, an initial draft for the project report. ASU DNP 705 has students plan for the project's life after implementation ends. The composite DNP student defines sustainability using a review from implementation science, then lays out how her fracture liaison pathway will survive her departure: a named owner, policies and record tools that make the pathway the default, continued monitoring with simple measures, planned adaptations, a funding argument and the risks that could end it. A short timeline shows how responsibility transfers over the year after the project.

CourseDNP 705 Health Care Outcomes Management
ModuleModule 7
Paper typeSustainability plan draft
LengthAbout 430 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 705 Module 7

1

When the Project Ends: Keeping a Nurse-Run Fracture Liaison Pathway Going

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

DNP 705: Health Care Outcomes Management

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the moment sustainability planning is for, the end of the student's involvement, and the program it must keep alive.
2

When the Project Ends: Keeping a Nurse-Run Fracture Liaison Pathway Going

Defining Sustainability

Sustainability has been described as the continued use of program components at sufficient intensity to keep achieving the program's goals and population outcomes, and implementation science increasingly recognizes that interventions often need to adapt to remain effective (Shelton et al., 2018). For this project, sustainability means that eligible patients continue to be identified, tested, educated and connected to treatment after the DNP project ends.

What this page is doingStarting from a published definition of sustainability gives the plan a standard against which each later section can be judged.
3

Ownership

The clinic's nurse manager has agreed to assign fracture liaison duties to a named registered nurse as part of that nurse's role description, with a backup nurse trained in the pathway. Ownership by a role, not a person, protects the program from staff turnover.

Embedding the Pathway

The record checklist stays switched on for all fracture patients 50 and older, making identification the default rather than an extra step. The standing order for bone density testing will be reviewed annually by the surgeons and included in the clinic's policy manual. Education handouts in English and Spanish will be stored with clinic forms.

Monitoring

A quarterly audit of 20 charts will track two measures: the proportion of eligible patients referred for bone density testing and the proportion starting treatment within six months. Results will be shared at the clinic's quality meeting. A drop below agreed thresholds will trigger a review.

What this page is doingOwnership, embedding in the record and quarterly monitoring are the three mechanisms the literature links to programs that last.
4

Planned Adaptations

Likely adaptations include adding telehealth follow-up calls, expanding to the clinic's satellite office, and coordinating with the hospital's inpatient team for hip fracture patients. Adaptations will be documented so the core elements, identification, testing, education, communication and follow-up, remain intact. Those are the elements most often shared by effective fracture liaison services, so changing them would put the results at risk (Wu et al., 2018).

Funding Argument

The pathway's main cost is nurse time. Economic reviews show that fracture liaison services are cost-effective or cost-saving and often return more than they cost (Xu et al., 2024), which supports a request to keep the role funded. Project data on treatment rates will strengthen that case.

Risks

Risks include loss of the nurse role in budget cuts, surgeon turnover that ends the standing order, and insurance barriers to medications. Each has a mitigation: quarterly data shared with leadership, policy-level standing orders and a list of patient assistance programs.

Transition Timeline

Months 1 to 3 after the project: the student co-leads with the assigned nurse. Months 4 to 6: the assigned nurse leads, with the student available for questions. Month 12: the clinic quality committee reviews a year of data and decides on expansion.

What this page is doingA dated handover from student to assigned nurse makes sustainability a schedule rather than a hope.
5

References

Shelton, R. C., Cooper, B. R., & Stirman, S. W. (2018). The sustainability of evidence-based interventions and practices in public health and health care. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731

Wu, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., Chen, P.-H., Yang, J.-J., Chang, P.-C., Huang, T.-C., Bagga, S., Sharma, Y., Lin, R.-M., & Chan, D.-C. (2018). Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: Systematic literature review. Osteoporosis International, 29(5), 1023-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4370-z

Xu, L., Zhao, T., Perry, L., Frost, S., Di Tanna, G., Wang, S., Chen, M., Kolt, G., Jan, S., & Si, L. (2024). Return on investment of fracture liaison services: A systematic review and analysis. Osteoporosis International, 35(6), 951-969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07027-2

What the DNP 705 Module 7 instructions ask for

The posted syllabus places the Sustainability assignment in Week 8, with the lesson on sustainability and the project topic of results, worth 35 points. Its purpose is to write an initial draft of the sustainability plan that will become part of the final project report. Expect to address who will continue the project, how it becomes part of routine operations, how it will be monitored and funded, and what could threaten it. Because the plan is a draft, faculty feedback will shape the final version, so note open questions. Talk with your site leaders before writing. Draft with your site leader if possible. Keep notes for the final report. Share a draft with your site mentor.

How this DNP 705 Module 7 example is built

The plan opens with a definition from implementation science, then answers the practical questions in turn: ownership, embedding, monitoring, adaptation, funding and risks. Ownership is assigned to a role rather than a person, which addresses turnover. Embedding relies on defaults in the record and policy, not reminders. Monitoring uses two simple measures with a trigger for action. A funding argument draws on economic evidence, and a timeline shows the handoff from student to clinic, which makes the plan concrete. Risks are paired with mitigations, which turns a list of worries into a plan. A timeline shows exactly when responsibility moves to the clinic. Each section answers a practical question. The transition timeline hands the work over in stages.

Reading the DNP 705 Module 7 grading rubric

Sustainability plans are usually graded on a clear definition of sustainability, identified ownership, strategies to embed the intervention in routine practice, ongoing monitoring, attention to funding and adaptation, recognition of risks, and alignment with the project. Faculty look for plans that would actually keep a program going without the student. Linking sustainability to data and leadership support shows strategic thinking. Planned adaptations that preserve core elements show understanding of how programs evolve. Plans that tie continued funding to data the project will produce show strategic thinking about the program's future. Clear ownership is the most important element faculty check. Mitigations for each risk show realistic planning. Specific dates help. Naming the people who will receive the quarterly numbers also earns credit.

DNP 705 Module 7 help with common mistakes

Plans often promise that staff will carry on without saying who or how. Assign ownership to a role. Another is relying on education or reminders alone; build the change into policies and records. Include monitoring with thresholds. Address funding realistically. Name risks and mitigations. Discuss the plan with your site before writing. If you would like help drafting your sustainability plan, send your project summary to the desk. Write down which core elements must stay the same even as the program adapts. Plan monitoring that the clinic can sustain without you. Name a backup person for every key task in the pathway.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Request this one custom, free All DNP 705 module samples

More DNP 705 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

DNP 705 Module 7 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DNP 705 Module 7 sample paper?

The sustainability plan is shown above in full: ownership, embedding, monitoring, adaptation, funding, risks and a transition timeline for a fracture liaison pathway.

What is sustainability in a DNP project?

The continued use of the intervention's core components at sufficient intensity to keep achieving its goals after the project ends.

How many points is the DNP 705 sustainability assignment?

Worth 35 points, it is submitted in Week 8.

How do I make a DNP project last after I leave?

Assign it to a role, embed it in policies and records, monitor simple measures and share results with leaders.

Is the DNP 705 sustainability plan final?

No. The syllabus describes it as an initial draft for the project report.