DNP 705 Module 1 DNP Project Proposal Worksheet Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This DNP 705 Module 1 sample is the DNP Project Proposal Worksheet in Health Care Outcomes Management, a core course in ASU's Doctor of Nursing Practice that turns an evidence-based practice question into a project plan. ASU DNP 705 starts with this worksheet so faculty and peers can see the topic, problem, evidence and proposed design before methods are built. The composite DNP student, a family nurse practitioner student in an orthopedic clinic in Phoenix, summarizes her project: a nurse-coordinated fracture liaison pathway to close the osteoporosis treatment gap after fragility fracture. The worksheet states the problem with local data, the evidence base, the framework, the design and outcomes, and the questions she still needs to answer.

CourseDNP 705 Health Care Outcomes Management
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeDNP project proposal worksheet
LengthAbout 314 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 705 Module 1

1

One Clinic, One Gap, One Pathway: A DNP Project Proposal Worksheet for Nurse-Coordinated Fracture Liaison Care

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

DNP 705: Health Care Outcomes Management

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title compresses the proposal into its setting, problem and solution, which is what a proposal worksheet must make clear at a glance.
2

One Clinic, One Gap, One Pathway: A DNP Project Proposal Worksheet for Nurse-Coordinated Fracture Liaison Care

Project Topic

Nurse-coordinated fracture liaison care to increase osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture in an outpatient orthopedic clinic.

Clinical Problem, Issue or Gap

Adults who sustain a fragility fracture are at high risk of another, yet few begin osteoporosis treatment. National claims show that only about 28% of hip fracture patients start osteoporosis drugs within a year (Solomon et al., 2014). Locally, 9 of 60 patients reviewed had a bone health plan and 4 started treatment within six months. Once the fracture heals, nobody on the team owns the patient's bone health.

Supporting Literature

Systematic reviews show that fracture liaison services increase bone density testing and treatment initiation and that dedicated coordination, multidisciplinary involvement, follow-up and patient education are key features (Wu et al., 2018). Meta-analytic evidence indicates fewer subsequent fractures with FLS care, particularly with follow-up beyond two years (Li et al., 2021).

What this page is doingThe gap is stated with a national figure and a local one, and the literature line names what effective programs share, so the worksheet already shows why this project and this intervention.
3

Framework

The knowledge-to-action framework guides implementation, from identifying the gap and adapting the evidence to our clinic through assessing barriers, tailoring interventions, monitoring use and evaluating outcomes.

Proposed Design

A QI design comparing six months before the pathway with six months after it. The clinic nurse will identify adults aged 50 and older with fragility fractures at the first visit, order bone density testing under a standing protocol, educate patients, send a treatment recommendation to the primary care clinician and call each patient at three months.

What this page is doingNaming a pre-post QI design at the worksheet stage tells faculty the student knows the project is improvement work, not research, which shapes every later assignment.
4

Outcomes

Primary: proportion of eligible patients starting osteoporosis treatment within six months. Secondary: proportion referred for and completing bone density testing; patient osteoporosis knowledge. Balancing: nurse time per patient.

Questions to Resolve This Term

Which validated instrument best measures patient knowledge? What consent process is needed for a QI project with a knowledge survey? What will the program cost, and who will sustain it after the project ends?

What this page is doingListing open questions shows the worksheet is a planning tool, and each question becomes a later module's assignment.
5

References

Li, N., Hiligsmann, M., Boonen, A., van Oostwaard, M. M., de Bot, R. T. A. L., Wyers, C. E., Bours, S. P. G., & van den Bergh, J. P. (2021). The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International, 32(8), 1517-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05911-9

Solomon, D. H., Johnston, S. S., Boytsov, N. N., McMorrow, D., Lane, J. M., & Krohn, K. D. (2014). Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 29(9), 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2202

Wu, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., Chen, P.-H., Yang, J.-J., Chang, P.-C., Huang, T.-C., Bagga, S., Sharma, Y., Lin, R.-M., & Chan, D.-C. (2018). Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: Systematic literature review. Osteoporosis International, 29(5), 1023-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4370-z

What the DNP 705 Module 1 instructions ask for

The posted syllabus places the DNP Project Proposal Worksheet in Week 1, alongside the lesson on linking frameworks to an evaluation or clinical question and the first immersion. It is worth 50 points. The syllabus describes its purpose as evaluating the evidence gathered so far, demonstrating clarity of process and showing where the evidence is leading, and informing others of the project topic, the clinical problem, issue or gap, the supporting literature and a design proposal to change practice patterns. Expect a structured template in Canvas; most students carry forward the PICOT question and evidence from their earlier evidence-based practice course. Bring a draft to the first immersion for peer feedback. Short, clear answers work best.

How the DNP 705 Module 1 example is put together

The worksheet uses short headed sections that match a typical template: topic, problem, literature, framework, design, outcomes and open questions. The problem section pairs national data with internal chart review data, which makes the local need clear. The literature section summarizes the strongest evidence in two sentences rather than reviewing every study. The design and outcomes are specific enough for peers to critique. Ending with unresolved questions shows faculty where help is needed and maps directly onto the assignments that follow in the course. Every section is kept to a few sentences, so faculty can review the whole project on one page before giving direction for the methods work ahead. Open questions point to later assignments.

Where the marks sit in the DNP 705 Module 1 rubric

Proposal worksheets are usually graded on a clearly stated topic and problem, supporting evidence, a framework that fits, a feasible design, measurable outcomes and clear writing. Faculty look for proposals that a reader unfamiliar with the project can understand quickly. Local data strengthen the case for a project in a specific setting. Naming open questions honestly is valued because the rest of the course is designed to answer them. Consistency with the PICOT question developed earlier shows a coherent project path. Clear headings that follow the template help faculty compare projects across the class. Faculty also check that the design fits the problem.

DNP 705 Module 1 help with common mistakes

The most common weakness is a worksheet that reads like a literature review. Keep each section brief and specific. Another is a design described only as an intervention, without a comparison or timeline. State outcomes in measurable terms and include a balancing measure. Make sure the framework you name will actually guide implementation. Bring your draft to the immersion for peer feedback. If you would like help completing your proposal worksheet, send your PICOT question and evidence summary to the desk. Keep the worksheet short; detail belongs in later assignments. Ask a peer to read it and summarize your project back to you; if they cannot, simplify.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Request this one custom, free All DNP 705 module samples

More DNP 705 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

DNP 705 Module 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DNP 705 Module 1 sample paper?

The DNP project proposal worksheet is above in full: a nurse-coordinated fracture liaison project with problem, local data, evidence, framework, design, outcomes and open questions.

What goes in the DNP 705 proposal worksheet?

The project's topic, the clinical problem or gap, supporting literature and a design proposal to change practice, with the evidence gathered so far.

How many points is the DNP 705 proposal worksheet?

The syllabus lists it at 50 points, due in Week 1.

What is a balancing measure in a DNP project?

It watches for side effects of the change, for example extra staff time or new delays.

Should the DNP 705 worksheet use my earlier PICOT question?

Usually yes; it builds on the evidence and question developed in your earlier evidence-based practice course.