| Course | DNP 705 Health Care Outcomes Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Logic model with narrative |
| Length | About 353 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 705 Module 2
If a Nurse Owns the Next Step, Then: A Logic Model for a Fracture Liaison Pathway
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 705: Health Care Outcomes Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
If a Nurse Owns the Next Step, Then: A Logic Model for a Fracture Liaison Pathway
Project Purpose
To raise the share of adults 50 and older with a fragility fracture who begin osteoporosis treatment within six months, using a nurse-run fracture liaison pathway in one orthopedic clinic.
Logic Model
| Component | Content |
|---|---|
| Inputs | Clinic registered nurse (8 hours a week), electronic record checklist, standing order for bone density testing, patient education materials, primary care partners, project lead |
| Activities | Identify eligible patients at first visit; order bone density testing; deliver education; send treatment recommendation to primary care; three-month follow-up call |
| Outputs | Number of eligible patients identified; percentage referred for testing; percentage educated; letters sent; calls completed |
| Short-term outcomes (0 to 3 months) | Increased bone density testing; increased patient osteoporosis knowledge |
| Intermediate outcomes (3 to 6 months) | Increased osteoporosis treatment initiation |
| Long-term outcomes (beyond the project) | Fewer subsequent fractures; sustained bone health pathway |
Narrative of the Logic
The chain rests on evidence that coordinated FLS models raise testing and treatment (Wu et al., 2018). Inputs make activities possible: without dedicated nurse time and a standing order, identification and referral depend on individual clinicians, which the baseline shows does not work. Activities produce countable outputs that confirm the pathway is functioning. Testing and knowledge are short-term outcomes because they lead to treatment decisions. Treatment initiation is the primary outcome and the project's target. Reduced subsequent fractures are the long-term reason for the work, consistent with meta-analytic evidence (Li et al., 2021), but they fall outside the project's six-month window.
Link to the Framework
The model maps onto the knowledge-to-action cycle. Activities represent the selected and tailored interventions; outputs reflect monitoring of knowledge use; outcomes represent evaluation. Sustaining the pathway, the cycle's last step, appears as a long-term outcome. The logic model format follows established guidance that links resources, activities and results in a visual chain (W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 2004).
Assumptions
Primary care clinicians will act on recommendations; patients will attend bone density testing; insurance will cover testing and medication.
External Factors
Insurance prior authorization, transportation, clinician turnover and competing priorities in a busy orthopedic clinic.
References
Li, N., Hiligsmann, M., Boonen, A., van Oostwaard, M. M., de Bot, R. T. A. L., Wyers, C. E., Bours, S. P. G., & van den Bergh, J. P. (2021). The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International, 32(8), 1517-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05911-9
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
Wu, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., Chen, P.-H., Yang, J.-J., Chang, P.-C., Huang, T.-C., Bagga, S., Sharma, Y., Lin, R.-M., & Chan, D.-C. (2018). Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: Systematic literature review. Osteoporosis International, 29(5), 1023-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4370-z
DNP 705 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms
The posted syllabus places the Logic Model in Week 2, with the lesson on foundations of project planning and evaluation, worth 50 points. Its purpose is a logic model that clearly shows how expected outcomes relate to the project purpose, theoretical framework and proposed intervention. A Logic Model Revision in Week 6 keeps the elements that still describe the project and revises those that have changed, so treat this first version as a working draft. Expect a template with inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes. Short narrative explanations of each link are often expected alongside the diagram, so check the Canvas instructions. Use the Kellogg guide or a template from Canvas. Expect peers to critique your model.
Inside the DNP 705 Module 2 example
The sample states the purpose first, then lays out the model in a table that runs from resources and activities to outputs and outcomes at three time points. A narrative explains each link and cites evidence for the assumption that coordination raises testing and treatment. A separate section maps the model onto the knowledge-to-action framework, as the syllabus requires. Assumptions and external factors are listed, which shows awareness of what could break the logic, and long-term outcomes are labeled as outside the project window to avoid overclaiming. A short purpose statement anchors the model so every component can be checked against it. Assumptions are written as testable statements. External factors are named honestly.
Reading the DNP 705 Module 2 grading rubric
Logic models are usually graded on alignment between purpose, framework, intervention and outcomes; logical sequencing of components; measurable outputs and outcomes; realistic time frames; and identification of assumptions and external factors. Faculty look for outputs that count what the program does and outcomes that describe change, not the other way around. A narrative that justifies each link with evidence strengthens the model. Explicit connection to the theoretical framework is a stated requirement and often decides the grade. Clear labels for time frames, short, intermediate and long term, make the model easy to read and to revise later. Faculty note when outputs and outcomes are confused, so label them carefully.
DNP 705 Module 2 help from the desk
The most common mistake is confusing outputs with outcomes. Outputs are counts of activity; outcomes are changes in people or systems. Another is listing long-term outcomes the project cannot measure without saying so. Tie the model to your framework explicitly. Keep inputs realistic, including staff time. Expect to revise the model in Week 6, so keep notes on what changes. If you would like help building your logic model, send your purpose and intervention to the desk. Draw the model before writing the narrative, then explain each arrow in a sentence or two. Check that every outcome has a matching activity that could plausibly produce it.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 705 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 705 Module 1: DNP Project Proposal Worksheet
- DNP 705 Module 3: Instrumentation and Intervention Assignment
- DNP 705 Module 4: DNP Project Ethics Assignment
- DNP 705 Module 5: Methods Paper Part 1
- DNP 705 Module 6: DNP Project Budget Plan
- DNP 705 Module 7: DNP Project Sustainability Plan
- DNP 714 Module 6: Individual Reflection 2: My Part in Team Processes
- DNP 606 Module 3: Clinical Experience and Evidence-Based Guideline Discussion
- DNP 713 Module 1: Organizational Culture Photo Diary
- DNP 716 Module 8: DNP Project Poster Presentation
DNP 705 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 705 Module 2 sample paper?
The logic model is shown above in full: inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes for a fracture liaison pathway, with narrative, framework link, assumptions and external factors.
What is the difference between outputs and outcomes in a logic model?
Outputs count what the program does, such as patients referred; outcomes describe resulting changes, such as treatment started.
When is the DNP 705 logic model due?
It is due in Week 2 and revised in Week 6.
How does a logic model connect to a framework?
Components such as activities and evaluation can be mapped onto the framework's steps, showing how theory guides the project.
Should long-term outcomes be measured in a DNP project?
Include them to show purpose, but state when they fall outside the project's measurement period.