| Course | DNP 716 Leadership of Innovation in Health Care |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 8 |
| Paper type | Poster presentation script with Q&A preparation |
| Length | About 454 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 716 Module 8
Three Minutes at the Poster: A Spoken Walk-Through of a Pressure Injury Prevention Project
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 716: Leadership of Innovation in Health Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Three Minutes at the Poster: A Spoken Walk-Through of a Pressure Injury Prevention Project
Thirty-Second Version
"In our ICU, pressure injuries on the sacrum and heels were a recurring harm. We added protective foam dressings for every high-risk patient at admission. In six months, those injuries fell from fourteen to four. The key was building the step into admission, so it happened every time."
Three-Minute Version
Start at the problem (point to the left column). "Fourteen patients in six months developed stage 2 or worse pressure injuries on the sacrum or heels in our 20-bed ICU. Each one adds pain, infection risk and length of stay."
Move to evidence. "A randomized trial in trauma and ICU patients found far fewer sacral and heel injuries when multilayer silicone foam dressings were added to standard care (Santamaria et al., 2015). We asked whether that result would hold on our unit."
Walk through the protocol (point to the numbered steps). "A Braden score of 18 or less at admission triggers the protocol. The nurse applies dressings within six hours, lifts and checks the skin every shift, and replaces them every three days. Turning and support surfaces did not change."
Show the results (point to the table and chart). "Injuries fell from fourteen to four, among a similar number of patients. Eighty-six percent of eligible patients had dressings on time, and we saw no skin injuries from the dressings themselves."
Close with meaning and limits. "This was one unit without a control group, so we cannot prove the dressings alone did it. But the change was simple, used existing staff, and it is now part of admission. Next we are comparing costs and spreading it to step-down."
End with an invitation: "What questions do you have?"
Prepared Questions and Answers
1. How did you define pressure injury stages? "We used the national staging definitions (Edsberg et al., 2016), and the wound nurse confirmed each case."
2. What about cost? "The dressings cost money every day; treating a single deep injury costs far more. A formal cost comparison is our next step."
3. Did staff resist? "Some worried about hiding skin under the dressing, so we built in a skin check every shift."
4. Could something else explain the drop? "Possibly. Awareness rose too. That is why we report it as improvement, not proof, as quality improvement reporting guidance expects (Ogrinc et al., 2016)."
5. How would you spread it? "Start with units that have similar patients, keep the trigger simple and audit dressing use quarterly."
Delivery Notes
Stand beside, not in front of, the poster. Point to the panels while speaking. Keep handouts with the abstract and contact information. Thank each visitor by name if they share it.
References
Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., Goldberg, M., McNichol, L., Moore, L., & Sieggreen, M. (2016). Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel pressure injury staging system: Revised pressure injury staging system. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 43(6), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000281
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(12), 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
Santamaria, N., Gerdtz, M., Sage, S., McCann, J., Freeman, A., Vassiliou, T., De Vincentis, S., Ng, A. W., Manias, E., Liu, W., & Knott, J. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: The border trial. International Wound Journal, 12(3), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12101
What the DNP 716 Module 8 instructions ask for
The posted syllabus grades the Poster Session at 50 points as an oral presentation on the in-person poster day, where students present their DNP project to ASU peers, mentors and faculty, bringing the printed poster developed earlier in the course. Visitors move between posters, so expect several short conversations rather than one formal talk. Prepare a brief version for passers-by and a longer walk-through for visitors who stop, and be ready for questions about methods, results and next steps. Check Canvas for the date, location and any evaluation form faculty will use while visiting posters. Rehearse at a real poster or a printed copy taped to a wall, so you practice pointing while speaking.
How this DNP 716 Module 8 example is built
The script gives two versions of the talk, a thirty-second summary and a three-minute walk-through, because poster sessions require both. The longer version moves through the poster in order and tells the presenter where to point. Evidence and results are stated simply, with limits acknowledged in the presenter's own words. Five prepared answers cover the questions visitors most often ask: definitions, cost, staff response, alternative explanations and spread. Delivery notes cover position, handouts and how to close a conversation. A single citation is spoken aloud where it supports a claim. The talk follows the poster from left to right, which helps visitors connect what they hear with what they see on the panels.
DNP 716 Module 8 rubric: what earns full marks
Poster presentations are usually graded on a clear and concise explanation of the project, accurate description of methods and results, use of the poster during the talk, ability to answer questions, acknowledgment of limitations and professional presence. Faculty look for presenters who can adjust to a visitor's time and interest. Prepared answers show depth. Honest discussion of limits shows integrity. Pointing to panels helps visitors follow. Professional dress, eye contact and a friendly opening make a strong impression on poster day. Presenters who invite questions early, rather than delivering a long monologue, usually leave visitors with a clearer memory of the project.
DNP 716 Module 8 help from the desk
Presenters often read the poster aloud. Know your project well enough to talk while pointing. Another trouble spot is having only one version of the talk; prepare a short and a long one. Practice answers to hard questions, especially about limitations and cost. If you would like help preparing your poster presentation, send your poster and project summary to the desk. Rehearse with a timer, then rehearse again with someone who interrupts with questions. Bring water, business cards or handouts, and arrive early to hang the poster. Prepare one sentence about what you would do differently if you started the project again, since faculty often ask exactly that on poster day.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 716 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 716 Module 1: Leadership Foundation Creative Presentation
- DNP 716 Module 2: Complexity Leadership Discussion
- DNP 716 Module 3: Module Facilitation Plan
- DNP 716 Module 4: Professional Role Analysis
- DNP 716 Module 5: DNP Project Poster
- DNP 716 Module 6: Team Leadership Discussion
- DNP 716 Module 7: Leading Teams Executive Summary
- DNP 713 Module 4: Mind Map: Schein, Hatch and Gagliardi
- DNP 714 Module 2: Team Assignment 1: Patient Portal Team Charter
- DNP 635 Module 1: Group Case Presentation: Acute Pharyngitis in a College Student
- DNP 627 Module 3: Targeted Group Project and Presentation: A Common Adult Cancer (Colorectal Cancer Protocol)
DNP 716 Module 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 716 Module 8 sample paper?
The poster presentation above is complete: a thirty-second and a three-minute talk for a foam dressing project, with five prepared answers and delivery notes.
How many points is the DNP 716 Poster Session?
The Poster Session oral presentation is worth 50 points.
Who attends the DNP 716 poster day?
ASU peers, mentors and faculty, at an in-person poster session.
How long should a poster presentation be?
Prepare a thirty-second summary and a walk-through of about three minutes, then answer questions.
What questions are asked at DNP poster sessions?
Common questions cover definitions, cost, staff response, alternative explanations for results and plans to spread the change.