| Course | DNP 716 Leadership of Innovation in Health Care |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | Poster content and layout |
| Length | About 387 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 716 Module 5
Padding the Pressure Points: Prophylactic Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Injuries in a Medical-Surgical ICU
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 716: Leadership of Innovation in Health Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Padding the Pressure Points: Prophylactic Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Injuries in a Medical-Surgical ICU
Title Band
Padding the Pressure Points: Prophylactic Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Injuries in a Medical-Surgical ICU. Composite DNP student, with the DNP project chair named on the final print; Arizona State University, Edson College.
Left Column
Background. A pressure injury is local harm to skin or deeper tissue where pressure, often combined with shear, bears on bone; staging runs from intact skin to full-thickness tissue loss (Edsberg et al., 2016).
Problem. Our 20-bed ICU recorded 14 hospital-acquired pressure injuries of stage 2 or worse on the sacrum or heels in six months.
Purpose. Reduce sacral and heel pressure injuries in high-risk ICU patients by adding prophylactic dressings to standard prevention.
Evidence. Randomized trauma and ICU patients who wore multilayer dressings at both sites developed far fewer injuries than those given standard care alone (3.1% vs 13.1%) (Santamaria et al., 2015).
Center Column
Protocol. (1) Braden score of 18 or less on ICU admission triggers the protocol. (2) Apply silicone foam dressings to sacrum and both heels within 6 hours. (3) Lift and inspect skin each shift. (4) Replace every 3 days or if soiled. (5) Continue turning and support surfaces as usual.
Methods. Quality improvement; pre-post comparison of six months before and after; quarterly audits of dressing use; reporting followed SQUIRE 2.0 (Ogrinc et al., 2016).
Bar chart caption: Injuries by month fell from a range of one to four before the protocol to zero or one after.
| Measure | Before (412 patients) | After (398 patients) |
|---|---|---|
| Sacral or heel injuries, stage 2 or worse | 14 | 4 |
| Eligible patients with dressings applied within 6 hours | Not applicable | 86% |
| Device-related skin injuries from dressings | Not applicable | 0 |
Right Column
Implications. A simple prevention step, built into admission workflow, reduced injuries without new staff.
Limitations. One unit; no control group; dressing costs not yet compared with treatment costs.
Next steps. Cost analysis; spread to the step-down unit.
Acknowledgments. ICU nurses, the wound care team and the quality analyst.
References. Three sources in small type.
Layout Notes
The results table and chart sit in the center at eye level. Text is limited to short labeled blocks of no more than 40 words. Body type is at least 24-point, and the unit is unnamed until leadership approves.
References
Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., Goldberg, M., McNichol, L., Moore, L., & Sieggreen, M. (2016). Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel pressure injury staging system: Revised pressure injury staging system. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 43(6), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000281
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(12), 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
Santamaria, N., Gerdtz, M., Sage, S., McCann, J., Freeman, A., Vassiliou, T., De Vincentis, S., Ng, A. W., Manias, E., Liu, W., & Knott, J. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: The border trial. International Wound Journal, 12(3), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12101
What the DNP 716 Module 5 instructions ask for
The posted syllabus grades Poster Development at 80 points and the Poster Session, an oral presentation, at 50 points. The poster gives an overview of your DNP project in a structured poster format, and students are responsible for printing it through the ASU Print and Imaging Lab or a local print shop in early April, before the in-person poster day in the courtyard. Poster work appears in Weeks 7 to 9, the professional role module. Expect a structured format with background, purpose, evidence, methods, results and implications. Check Canvas for the required template and size, and ask your project chair to review a draft before printing. Print a small proof first; colors and fonts often look different on paper than on screen.
Inside the DNP 716 Module 5 example
The poster content is written panel by panel in reading order, so faculty can judge structure and content together. Each panel is a short labeled block. A definition from the staging system anchors the background, and a randomized trial supports the intervention. The protocol is numbered so viewers can copy it. A results table gives counts with denominators, and the chart caption tells viewers what to notice. Limitations and next steps are stated plainly. Layout notes explain where results sit, how large the type is and why the unit is unnamed. The results table repeats the exact numbers used in the project paper and abstract, so a reviewer comparing documents will find nothing inconsistent.
Where the marks sit in the DNP 716 Module 5 rubric
Poster grades usually rest on whether the project can be understood in the few minutes a visitor gives it. Faculty check that each panel is present and correct, that the protocol could be copied, that results carry denominators, and that the chart caption tells viewers what to see. Readability from a few feet away is part of the score, so dense text loses points while short labeled blocks earn them. Matching every figure to the abstract and paper protects credibility. Naming the project's limits on the poster itself is a mark of integrity. Citations in small type at the bottom are still expected. A consistent font, color and margin plan gives the whole poster a professional look.
DNP 716 Module 5 help: mistakes that cost marks
Many first drafts lift whole paragraphs from the project paper. Give each panel a label and no more than about forty words, and let a table or one chart hold the results. Small type is the other usual problem: print a letter-size proof and hold it at arm's length; if you squint, enlarge it. Follow the required template and size exactly. Check every number against your abstract. The desk can help turn your DNP project into poster panels if you share your project summary, results and the required template. Book printing in early April so there is time to fix problems, and bring a few printed handouts for visitors.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 716 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 716 Module 1: Leadership Foundation Creative Presentation
- DNP 716 Module 2: Complexity Leadership Discussion
- DNP 716 Module 3: Module Facilitation Plan
- DNP 716 Module 4: Professional Role Analysis
- DNP 716 Module 6: Team Leadership Discussion
- DNP 716 Module 7: Leading Teams Executive Summary
- DNP 716 Module 8: DNP Project Poster Presentation
- DNP 625 Module 2: Clinical Vignette Discussion Board 2: Neurological
- DNP 715 Module 7: Revised Team Charter and Project Plan
- DNP 714 Module 2: Team Assignment 1: Patient Portal Team Charter
- DNP 671 Module 9: Discussion: Motivational Interviewing With Adolescents Who Use Substances
DNP 716 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 716 Module 5 sample paper?
The project poster above is complete: every panel of a DNP poster on prophylactic foam dressings for ICU pressure injuries, with results, limitations and layout notes.
How many points is the DNP 716 Project Poster?
Poster Development is worth 80 points, and the Poster Session another 50.
Where do DNP 716 students print posters?
Through the ASU Print and Imaging Lab or a local print shop, in early April.
Do foam dressings prevent pressure injuries?
In one randomized trial of trauma and ICU patients, those given prophylactic dressings developed significantly fewer sacral and heel injuries.
What sections should a DNP project poster include?
Background, problem, purpose, evidence, intervention, methods, results, implications, limitations, acknowledgments and references.