| Course | DNP 705 Health Care Outcomes Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Project budget plan |
| Length | About 441 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 705 Module 6
What Six Months of a Bone Health Nurse Costs and What It Might Save: A DNP Project Budget Plan
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 705: Health Care Outcomes Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
What Six Months of a Bone Health Nurse Costs and What It Might Save: A DNP Project Budget Plan
Budget Overview
The project runs for six months of implementation in one clinic. Most costs are staff time that the clinic will absorb as in-kind support.
Bone density testing and osteoporosis medications are billed to patients' insurance as standard care and are not project costs.
| Item | Calculation | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Registered nurse time | 8 hours weekly for 26 weeks, $48 an hour with benefits | $9,984 |
| Nurse training | 4 hours for two nurses at $48 an hour | $384 |
| Electronic record checklist build | 6 hours of informatics analyst time at $55 an hour | $330 |
| Printed education materials, English and Spanish | 300 copies at $0.40 | $120 |
| Telephone follow-up | Included in nurse time | $0 |
| Statistical consultation | 3 hours at $75 an hour | $225 |
| Project lead time | Student time, unpaid | $0 |
| Direct costs total | | $11,043 | |
| Indirect costs | Space, utilities and overhead at the clinic's 10% rate | $1,104 |
| Total | | $12,147 |
In-Kind Contributions and Funding Sources
The clinic has agreed to provide nurse time and space as in-kind support, covering most of the budget. Possible external sources include a small grant from a professional nursing organization, a hospital foundation quality grant, or industry-independent bone health foundations. The project will not accept funding from drug manufacturers, to avoid conflicts of interest in treatment recommendations.
Cost Versus Savings
Economic evaluations of fracture liaison services are favorable. A systematic review of 23 economic studies found FLS to be cost-effective or cost-saving across different countries and designs (Wu et al., 2018). A later analysis of 23 FLS programs estimated a mean return on investment of 10.49, with most programs showing positive returns, and found the highest returns in services that made treatment recommendations or involved primary care (Xu et al., 2024).
Without a pathway, most hip fracture patients in the United States never begin osteoporosis medication, and use fell during the decade before this project (Solomon et al., 2014), so the cost of doing nothing is real. For this clinic, a cautious estimate assumes that 150 patients pass through the pathway, treatment rises from 7% to 35%, and treatment prevents a small number of subsequent fractures over several years. If the pathway prevents even one hip fracture, savings in hospital, surgical and rehabilitation costs would likely exceed the project's cost. These are projections, not project outcomes, and the six-month project will not measure fractures prevented.
Revenue Considerations
Nurse education visits are not separately billable in this clinic, so the pathway does not generate direct revenue. Its value lies in quality, patient outcomes and system savings, and potentially in performance measures that payers track.
References
Solomon, D. H., Johnston, S. S., Boytsov, N. N., McMorrow, D., Lane, J. M., & Krohn, K. D. (2014). Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 29(9), 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2202
Wu, C.-H., Kao, I.-J., Hung, W.-C., Lin, S.-C., Liu, H.-C., Hsieh, M.-H., Bagga, S., Achra, M., Cheng, T.-T., & Yang, R.-S. (2018). Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: A systematic review of the literature. Osteoporosis International, 29(6), 1227-1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4411-2
Xu, L., Zhao, T., Perry, L., Frost, S., Di Tanna, G., Wang, S., Chen, M., Kolt, G., Jan, S., & Si, L. (2024). Return on investment of fracture liaison services: A systematic review and analysis. Osteoporosis International, 35(6), 951-969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07027-2
What the DNP 705 Module 6 instructions ask for
The posted syllabus places the Budget Plan in Week 7, with the lesson on budgeting and economic evaluation and the second immersion, worth 35 points. Its purpose is to establish a budget for the project, including direct and indirect costs and potential sources of funding, with total costs built into a basic overview of cost versus revenue or savings. Expect a budget table, a narrative of funding sources and a cost-benefit or cost-savings discussion. Use realistic local salary and overhead figures where you can, and label estimates as estimates. Use real local costs when possible. Ask your site about in-kind support early. Separate project costs from billed care.
Inside the DNP 705 Module 6 example
The plan presents a budget table with line items, calculations and totals, then separates direct, indirect and in-kind costs. Items billed as standard care are excluded with an explanation, which shows careful thinking about what the project actually costs. Funding sources are realistic and include a conflict-of-interest safeguard. The savings section draws on two economic reviews, states its assumptions, and avoids claiming outcomes the project will not measure. Assumptions behind the savings estimate are stated in plain words, so a reader can judge how cautious the projection is. A revenue section explains why the pathway earns no direct income. Excluded items are explained so the total is believable. Two economic reviews support the savings estimate. In-kind support is shown clearly.
Reading the DNP 705 Module 6 grading rubric
Budget plans are usually graded on completeness of direct and indirect costs, clear calculations, realistic funding sources, a reasoned cost versus revenue or savings overview, and supporting evidence. Faculty look for budgets that include staff time, which students often forget, and for honest labeling of projections. Recognizing in-kind support shows understanding of how projects are actually funded. Avoiding conflicts of interest in funding demonstrates professionalism. Calculations shown line by line make budgets easy to check and are usually credited. Realistic local wage figures add credibility. Faculty look for honest labeling of estimates. Conflict-of-interest safeguards are a plus.
DNP 705 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks
The most common weakness is a budget that lists supplies but omits staff time. Include every hour of work. Another is claiming savings the project cannot measure. Label projections and state assumptions. Use local salary figures, including benefits. Separate project costs from standard care costs billed to insurance. If you would like help building your project budget, send your intervention and timeline to the desk. Ask your site's finance or practice manager for actual wage and overhead rates instead of guessing. Keep projections separate from measured outcomes. Include indirect costs at your site's rate. Show every calculation so a reviewer can check it. Name funding sources that are realistic for your setting and free of conflicts.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 705 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 705 Module 1: DNP Project Proposal Worksheet
- DNP 705 Module 2: DNP Project Logic Model
- DNP 705 Module 3: Instrumentation and Intervention Assignment
- DNP 705 Module 4: DNP Project Ethics Assignment
- DNP 705 Module 5: Methods Paper Part 1
- DNP 705 Module 7: DNP Project Sustainability Plan
- DNP 679 Module 4: Chi-Square Test Written Assignment
- DNP 673 Module 3: Using CBT With a Client Discussion
- DNP 711 Module 1: Blog 1: The Story of a Policy Topic
- DNP 625 Module 1: Clinical Vignette Discussion Board 1: Cardiovascular
DNP 705 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 705 Module 6 sample paper?
The budget plan is above in full: direct, indirect and in-kind costs for a fracture liaison pathway, funding sources, and a cost versus savings overview using economic reviews.
What goes in the DNP 705 budget plan?
Direct and indirect costs, potential funding sources and a basic overview of cost versus revenue or savings.
How many points is the DNP 705 budget plan?
It carries 35 points and is due in Week 7.
What are indirect costs in a DNP project budget?
Overhead such as space, utilities and administration, often calculated as a percentage of direct costs.
Should I include my own time in a DNP project budget?
Many students list it as unpaid or in-kind so the true resource use is visible.