| Course | DNP 708 Systems Thinking in a Complex Health Care Environment |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | Reflection paper |
| Length | About 798 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 708 Module 5
Evidence Took Me to the Door, Relationships Took Me Inside: A Reflection on Evidence, Innovation and Leadership
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 708: Systems Thinking in a Complex Health Care Environment
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Evidence Took Me to the Door, Relationships Took Me Inside: A Reflection on Evidence, Innovation and Leadership
Introduction
Back in Week 1, systems thinking looked to me like a way to draw better diagrams. After three versions of a map of heat deaths among older adults living alone, I see it as a way of deciding where to act when no one is in charge. This reflection considers the three words in the assignment's title, evidence, innovation and leadership, in the order I learned them.
Evidence: What It Settled and What It Could Not
Evidence did its most important work early. County research showed that heat deaths cluster where older adults live alone in poor, unshaded neighborhoods (Harlan et al., 2013), which told me who to look for. A laboratory study changed my plan: an afternoon in a cooling center drops an older person's core temperature, yet that gain is gone within hours of going back into the heat (Meade et al., 2023). Without that study, I would have built a program around getting people out of their homes for a few hours, and it would have missed the nights.
Evidence was less helpful on what to do next. I found no trial of a program like Summer Safe. The studies described risk and physiology, not how to make a utility program, a health plan and a church volunteer list work together. At that point I had to rely on reasoning about the system, informed by the course texts, and on the judgment of people who had worked on heat for years. Systems thinking research itself acknowledges that much of what helps in complex systems is learned by trying, measuring and adapting rather than proven in advance (Peters, 2014). The honest conclusion is that evidence pointed me to the door, and the design behind it is a hypothesis to be tested.
Innovation: Where the New Idea Came From
I expected innovation to mean a new technology. The one idea in my design that partners called new was not a technology at all: it was the decision to start in April, before the first warning, instead of reacting during heat waves. That idea came from Version 1's cost loop, which showed that once summer bills arrive, people have already decided to switch cooling off. The map made the timing visible.
The second source of innovation was other people. The paramedic referral button came from a fire captain during my stakeholder interviews; the faith group call list came from a pastor who already called her older members during monsoon storms. Weberg and Davidson (2025) describe innovation as something that emerges from networks and connections rather than from a single inventor, and that matched my experience closely. My contribution was to connect ideas that already existed.
Leadership: Leading Without Authority
The hardest lesson was about authority. I manage a home health agency. I do not manage paramedics, utilities, the county or churches, and every one of them was essential to the design. Quantum leadership, as the course text describes it, locates the leader's influence in relationships and shared purpose rather than in hierarchy (Albert & Pappas, 2025). In practice, that meant asking more than telling, offering my agency's data before asking for theirs, and letting partners shape their part of the program even when I would have designed it differently.
I also learned that my instinct under pressure is to shrink the problem until it fits what I control. Version 1 was that instinct on paper. Each later version required me to tolerate a larger, messier system and still choose a few places to act. The complexity literature describes that balance, living with uncertainty while acting through simple rules and small experiments, as central to leading in complex systems (Plsek & Greenhalgh, 2001).
Three Changes to How I Will Lead
1. I will map before I plan. For any new problem in my agency, I will draw the system, including the parts I do not control, before choosing a solution.
2. I will build learning into every program from the first week, with a feedback loop that reaches every partner, instead of waiting for a final report.
3. I will measure my leadership by the connections I create. At the end of next summer I will count how many partners share data and meet regularly, not only how many patients we enrolled.
Conclusion
Evidence told me who was dying and why the obvious fix was not enough. Innovation came from timing and from other people's ideas. Leadership, in a system no one owns, meant building relationships strong enough to carry a shared purpose through a Phoenix summer. I leave the course with a design to test and a clearer sense of the leader I need to become to test it well.
References
Albert, N. M., & Pappas, S. (2025). Quantum leadership: Creating sustainable value in health care (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Harlan, S. L., Declet-Barreto, J. H., Stefanov, W. L., & Petitti, D. B. (2013). Neighborhood effects on heat deaths: Social and environmental predictors of vulnerability in Maricopa County, Arizona. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104625
Meade, R. D., Notley, S. R., Akerman, A. P., McCormick, J. J., King, K. E., Sigal, R. J., & Kenny, G. P. (2023). Efficacy of cooling centers for mitigating physiological strain in older adults during daylong heat exposure: A laboratory-based heat wave simulation. Environmental Health Perspectives, 131(6), 067003. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11651
Peters, D. H. (2014). The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking? Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-51
Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ, 323(7313), 625-628. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625
Weberg, D., & Davidson, S. (2025). Leadership for evidence-based innovation in nursing and health professions (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
What the DNP 708 Module 5 instructions ask for
The posted syllabus lists one paper in DNP 708, worth 11.6% of the grade, titled Reflection: Evidence, Innovation, and Leadership to Advance the Health Care System, due in Weeks 7 to 10 alongside the final map. It falls under the outcome asking students to articulate personal insights in applying systems thinking in the innovator role. The rubric in Canvas sets the length and required elements. Expect to reflect on your semester's work, especially the three map versions, and to address each of the three words in the title: what evidence contributed, where innovation came from and what leadership required. Draw on specific moments rather than general impressions, and end with how your practice will change. Reread your earlier map narratives first.
How the DNP 708 Module 5 example is put together
The paper is organized around the three words in the assignment title, in the order the writer learned them. The evidence section reports what county research and a laboratory study settled and states plainly what evidence could not settle. The innovation section identifies two real sources of new ideas, the timing revealed by the map and suggestions from stakeholders. The leadership section reflects on leading without authority and on the writer's tendency to shrink problems, linking both to course texts. Three numbered changes, each with a measure, follow. The conclusion restates the three words in three sentences. Six sources support the reflection, including both required course texts.
DNP 708 Module 5 rubric: what earns full marks
A reflection paper in this course is likely graded on depth of personal insight, integration of course concepts and texts, connection to the student's own map and intervention, honest appraisal of evidence, clarity about the innovator and leader role, and scholarly writing. Insight is most convincing when tied to specific moments, such as a change between map versions. Using both required texts shows integration. Admitting the limits of evidence and of one's own instincts reads as maturity. Commitments with measures show the reflection will affect practice. Following the three words of the title as an organizing structure makes the paper easy to grade.
DNP 708 Module 5 help with common mistakes
Reflection papers often retell the course week by week. Organize around what you learned and use the course as evidence. Another common problem is claiming the intervention is fully evidence-based when the evidence only describes the problem; say what is still a hypothesis. Avoid general statements about leadership that could apply to anyone. Share your three map narratives and jot down what surprised you, and the desk can help draft the reflection. Quote your own earlier work where it shows change. Leave time to revise, since the best insight often appears in the second draft. Keep the commitments small enough to keep. Make sure each of the three words in the title gets its own section or clear paragraph.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 708 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 708 Module 1: Case Study: Developing a Culture of Interprofessional Collaboration
- DNP 708 Module 2: Map Version 1: An Innovative Solution to an Unresolved Problem
- DNP 708 Module 3: Map Version 2: The Problem in the National System
- DNP 708 Module 4: Map Version 3: Designing an Innovative Systems Intervention
- DNP 716 Module 5: DNP Project Poster
- DNP 709 Module 4: Leader Self-Assessment Paper
- DNP 649 Module 2: Reproductive Physiology Case Study: PCOS
- DNP 671 Module 6: Discussion: Interviewing for Mood Disorders Across Ages
DNP 708 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 708 Module 5 sample paper?
The reflection above is a complete DNP 708 sample of the Evidence, Innovation, and Leadership paper, built on a semester of systems maps about heat deaths among older adults.
How many papers are in DNP 708?
The posted syllabus lists one paper, the reflection on evidence, innovation and leadership, worth 11.6% of the grade.
What should the DNP 708 reflection cover?
Address what evidence contributed, where innovation came from and what leadership required, using specific moments from your three systems maps.
Which texts should I cite in the DNP 708 reflection?
Both required books fit this paper: Albert and Pappas for quantum leadership, and the Weberg and Davidson text for leading innovation from evidence.
Is the reflection due with Map Version 3?
Yes. Yes. Both fall in the course's last unit, the one devoted to system interventions.