| Course | NUR 350 Professional Nurse Attributes Accomplished |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Feasibility table with synthesis |
| Length | About 569 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BSN in Nursing |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 350 Module 3
Can This Unit Do It? A Feasibility Table and Synthesis for Bringing Self-Chosen Music to Ventilated Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
NUR 350: Professional Nurse Attributes: Accomplished
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Can This Unit Do It? A Feasibility Table and Synthesis for Bringing Self-Chosen Music to Ventilated Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
Purpose
The EBP summary established that patient-directed music can reduce anxiety and sedative exposure in alert ventilated adults. This table asks a different question: can our unit implement it? Feasibility depends on resources, people and fit, not only on evidence. The Iowa Model of evidence-based practice places this kind of judgment before a pilot, asking whether a change is appropriate for the setting and what is needed to try it (Iowa Model Collaborative, 2017).
Feasibility Table
| Factor | What implementation requires | Evidence or local information | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Six tablets, headphones and covers; music service or downloaded library | About $1,800 for equipment; unit education budget can cover it | Feasible |
| Staff time | About ten minutes per patient on day one for the preference assessment; one minute a day for anxiety rating | Charge nurses estimate one to two eligible patients per shift | Feasible with support |
| Equipment | Tablets that can be cleaned between patients; volume limits; charging | Biomedical engineering can set volume limits; storage space available | Feasible |
| Infection control | Single-patient headphones or disposable covers; cleaning protocol for tablets | Infection prevention must approve the cleaning method | Barrier to resolve |
| Patient fit | Alert enough to signal yes or no; able to tolerate headphones | About a third of ventilated patients on our unit meet this on a given day | Feasible for a subgroup |
| Staff acceptance | Nurses willing to offer and document | Informal survey of 14 nurses: 11 supportive, 3 worried about time | Mostly favorable |
| Leadership support | Nurse manager approval; champion nurses | Manager supportive of a pilot; two nurses volunteered as champions | Feasible |
| Family role | Families help identify music | Families often ask how they can help | Strength |
| Measurement | Daily anxiety scale; sedative doses from the record | Visual analog scale used in the trial is quick to use (Chlan et al., 2013) | Feasible |
Synthesis
Most factors favor implementation. The equipment is inexpensive, the intervention is low risk, leaders and most nurses support it, and families can make the preference assessment faster by naming music the patient loves. The measurement tools are short enough to use daily. The trial behind the intervention also showed that patients use music very unevenly, with a daily median of just 12 minutes (Chlan et al., 2013), so the unit should expect some patients to decline and should not treat low use as failure.
Two barriers must be solved before starting. The first is infection control. Shared headphones are a real concern in an ICU, and the unit cannot begin until infection prevention approves single-patient headphones and a tablet cleaning method. The second is nurse time. Three nurses worried that the day-one assessment would be hard on short-staffed shifts. A solution is to ask families or the unit's music volunteer to complete the preference assessment, leaving nurses to offer the music and record anxiety.
Fit matters as well. Because only about a third of ventilated patients are alert enough on a given day, the change will reach a subgroup. That is consistent with the evidence, which tested music in patients able to choose, and with what patients describe needing: some control over their surroundings and a way to connect (Karlsson et al., 2012).
Decision
Proceed to a four-week pilot on one pod of eight beds after infection prevention approves the equipment plan, with champions trained first and a check at two weeks.
References
Chlan, L. L., Weinert, C. R., Heiderscheit, A., Tracy, M. F., Skaar, D. J., Guttormson, J. L., & Savik, K. (2013). Effects of patient-directed music intervention on anxiety and sedative exposure in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 309(22), 2335-2344. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.5670
Iowa Model Collaborative. (2017). Iowa model of evidence-based practice: Revisions and validation. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12223
Karlsson, V., Bergbom, I., & Forsberg, A. (2012). The lived experiences of adult intensive care patients who were conscious during mechanical ventilation: A phenomenological-hermeneutic study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 28(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2011.11.002
NUR 350 Module 3 instructions, in plain terms
The posted syllabus lists the Evidence-Based Feasibility Table and Synthesis at 10% of the NUR 350 grade and describes it as a brainstorming process to guide development of an implementation plan for practice change. It is one of the core project assignments that count toward the 77% cumulative core score. Canvas holds the rubric and any table template the instructor requires. Expect to examine whether your intervention can actually be carried out on a specific unit, rating factors such as cost, staff time, equipment, safety, patient fit, staff acceptance and leadership support, and then to write a synthesis that weighs those factors and names what must be solved first. Talking with your clinical unit's staff gives you the local information that makes the table credible.
How this NUR 350 Module 3 example is built
The paper opens by stating the feasibility question and placing it within an evidence-based practice model. A table rates nine factors, each with what implementation requires, the evidence or local information behind the judgment and a rating. The synthesis first explains why most factors favor implementation, including what the trial's uneven usage means for expectations. It then names two barriers, infection control and nurse time, and proposes a solution for each, followed by a paragraph on patient fit linked to the qualitative evidence. A short decision statement sets the scope of a pilot. Three sources support the analysis. The table and synthesis together fit on a few pages, as a brainstorming tool should.
Where the marks sit in the NUR 350 Module 3 rubric
Graders will look for a full set of factors, the use of evidence and local information for each rating, the quality of the synthesis, identification of barriers with realistic solutions and a clear link to the implementation plan. Ratings earn credit when they rest on data, such as cost figures or staff input, rather than assumptions. A synthesis that weighs strengths against barriers shows judgment. Practical solutions, such as shifting a task to families or volunteers, show readiness to implement. A clear decision at the end connects the brainstorming to the next assignment. APA citations should support any claims drawn from the literature.
NUR 350 Module 3 help with common mistakes
A common weakness is a table that rates everything as feasible. Look honestly for barriers; faculty expect to see them. Another is ratings with no basis; ask staff, check prices and talk to your clinical unit's infection prevention or educator. Keep the synthesis focused on what the table found. Describe your intervention and your clinical unit, and the desk can set up a feasibility table to fill with your local facts. Use the template your course provides if there is one. Bring your table to your clinical preceptor for a reality check. Record who gave you each piece of local information so you can cite it accurately.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 350 and BSN in Nursing sample papers
- NUR 350 Module 1: Leadership Style Analysis Discussion Board
- NUR 350 Module 2: EBP Summary Paper
- NUR 350 Module 4: EBP Capstone: Evaluation and Dissemination
- NUR 350 Module 5: EBP Final Paper
- NUR 350 Module 6: EBP PowerPoint Presentation With Voice-Over
- NUR 315 Module 3: EBP Paper 2: Quantitative Critical Appraisal
- NUR 402 Module 5: Innovative Intervention PowerPoint Presentation
- NUR 458 Module 3: Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment
- NUR 405 Module 4: Group Paper: Initiating, Supporting and Sustaining Change
NUR 350 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 350 Module 3 sample paper?
The paper above is a complete NUR 350 Feasibility Table and Synthesis sample on letting ventilated ICU patients choose their own music, with nine rated factors and two barriers.
What is the NUR 350 feasibility table?
A brainstorming table and written synthesis that test whether your evidence-based intervention can be implemented on a unit and guide your implementation plan.
How much is the NUR 350 feasibility assignment worth?
The posted syllabus lists the Evidence-Based Feasibility Table and Synthesis at 10% of the grade.
What factors belong in a feasibility analysis?
Cost, staff time, equipment, safety and infection control, patient fit, staff acceptance, leadership support and how outcomes will be measured.
What if my feasibility table finds a barrier?
Name it and propose a realistic solution; identifying barriers is part of the assignment's purpose.