DNP 715 Module 6 Technology, Safety and Quality Discussion Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This DNP 715 Module 6 sample is the second written discussion board in Dynamics and Principles of Information in Healthcare, part of ASU's Doctor of Nursing Practice. ASU DNP 715 closes its discussion work with patient safety and quality issues that technology creates or shapes. The composite charge nurse writes about physiologic monitor alarms on the telemetry beds her unit shares, where a one-week count found about 700 alarms a day, most requiring no action. Her post defines alarm fatigue, reviews the evidence on causes and harm, proposes three changes nurses can lead, and replies to classmates writing about smart infusion pumps and patient portal messages.

CourseDNP 715 Dynamics and Principles of Information in Healthcare
ModuleModule 6
Paper typeDiscussion board post and replies
LengthAbout 379 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 715 Module 6

1

Seven Hundred Beeps a Day: Alarm Fatigue as a Technology-Driven Safety Problem

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

DNP 715: Dynamics and Principles of Information in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title starts with a number from the writer's own unit, which makes an abstract safety concept concrete before the post explains it.
2

Seven Hundred Beeps a Day: Alarm Fatigue as a Technology-Driven Safety Problem

Initial Post

Last month our unit counted alarms from the eight telemetry beds for one week: an average of about 700 a day. When we reviewed a sample, most were for artifact, brief self-correcting changes or settings that were not adjusted for the patient. Nurses described tuning out alarms and silencing them without checking.

This is alarm fatigue: desensitization that occurs when clinicians are exposed to large numbers of alarms, leading to slower responses or missed alarms. A review of the problem found that most monitor alarms are false or clinically insignificant, that alarm fatigue has been linked to patient deaths, and that practical interventions such as changing electrodes daily, individualizing alarm parameters and adjusting delays can reduce alarm volume (Sendelbach & Funk, 2013). Technology designed to protect patients can harm them when it overwhelms the people meant to respond.

Alarm fatigue is a systems problem, not a nursing failure. Monitors are sold with default settings, units add more monitoring than needed, and no one owns alarm management. The same pattern appears in other technologies: barcode systems prompt workarounds when their alerts and equipment fail nurses (Koppel et al., 2008), and a vendor sepsis model alerted on a large share of all inpatients (Wong et al., 2021).

Three changes nurses can lead: daily electrode changes with skin preparation; a protocol letting nurses tailor alarm limits, within set ranges, as each shift begins; and a review of telemetry orders so that monitoring is discontinued when no longer indicated. We will measure alarms per bed per day and response times before and after.

For the group: where have you seen an alarm committee succeed, and who served on it?

What this page is doingThe writer measured her own unit's alarm load before writing, then linked alarm fatigue to the barcode and sepsis examples, showing the pattern across technologies that the discussion prompt asks students to explore.
3

Reply to a Classmate (Critical Care Nurse)

You described smart infusion pump alerts being overridden. That mirrors alarm fatigue: if pump libraries are not updated, alerts fire for appropriate doses and staff learn to ignore them. Does your pharmacy review override data to refine the drug library?

Reply to a Classmate (Nurse Practitioner)

Your concern that patient portal messages are creating an invisible workload is a quality issue too. Delayed replies could miss urgent symptoms. Has your clinic set a standard response time and a way to flag urgent messages?

What this page is doingBoth replies extend the safety theme to a different technology and close with a concrete question the classmate can answer from practice.
4

References

Koppel, R., Wetterneck, T., Telles, J. L., & Karsh, B.-T. (2008). Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(4), 408-423. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2616

Sendelbach, S., & Funk, M. (2013). Alarm fatigue: A patient safety concern. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 24(4), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e3182a903f9

Wong, A., Otles, E., Donnelly, J. P., Krumm, A., McCullough, J., DeTroyer-Cooley, O., Pestrue, J., Phillips, M., Konye, J., Penoza, C., Ghous, M., & Singh, K. (2021). External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(8), 1065-1070. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626

What the DNP 715 Module 6 instructions ask for

This board and the earlier one together carry 90 points. The second turns to patient safety and quality issues in healthcare influenced by technology, and asks how such problems affect care delivery, nurses at every level and the outcomes of patients and systems. The specific prompt appears in Canvas. You will post first, drawing on evidence and your own unit, and then answer classmates in substance. Choosing an issue you can measure on your own unit, even informally, gives the post weight. Connect this discussion to your individual technology assignments where it fits. Pick an issue that connects to your individual assignments if you can, since the overlap deepens both pieces of work.

How this DNP 715 Module 6 example is built

The post opens with a local count, which makes the issue concrete, then defines the problem from a review and summarizes evidence on causes, harm and interventions. It frames alarm fatigue as a system problem and links it to a pattern across technologies, which shows analysis. Three changes nurses can lead are specific and measurable. A question invites the group to share experience. Replies connect classmates' topics, infusion pumps and patient portals, to the same pattern of signal overload and ask questions about measurement and ownership. Local alarm counts give the post concrete weight, and the writer is careful to describe them as a one-week count rather than formal research.

Where the marks sit in the DNP 715 Module 6 rubric

When faculty read a post about technology and safety, they ask four things. Is the problem defined precisely and supported by a credible source? Does the writer show how it reaches patients and nurses, rather than describing it in general? Are the proposed fixes things nurses could actually lead, each with a way to know whether it worked? And do the replies connect classmates' topics to a shared pattern instead of offering praise? A count from the writer's own unit, even a rough one, makes the first answer stronger. Treating the issue as a system failure rather than a lapse by individuals shows the stance an advanced practice nurse needs. Short paragraphs and clear citations help classmates respond.

DNP 715 Module 6 help with common mistakes

Discussion posts on technology safety often list problems without evidence or solutions. Choose one issue, define it from a source, and propose specific fixes. Another weakness is blaming users; look for design and workflow causes. If possible, count something on your unit. The desk can help with your technology and safety post if you share the faculty prompt and any unit data you have gathered. When replying, look for a connection between your issue and a classmate's, since shared patterns make the strongest replies. Keep your initial post within any length limit. Close with something your classmates can answer from experience, and check back the next day to respond to anyone who answers it.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DNP 715 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

DNP 715 Module 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DNP 715 Module 6 sample paper?

The technology and safety discussion above is complete: alarm fatigue on a telemetry unit examined with evidence and local data, three nurse-led fixes and two replies.

What does the second DNP 715 discussion board cover?

Patient safety and quality issues in healthcare that are influenced by technology.

What is alarm fatigue?

Desensitization from exposure to many alarms, leading to slower responses or missed alarms.

How can nurses reduce alarm fatigue?

Daily electrode changes, individualized alarm limits and discontinuing monitoring when no longer indicated.

Are most monitor alarms actionable?

No. Reviews have found that most are false or clinically insignificant.