DNP 715 Module 3 Healthy People 2030 Progress Assessment Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This DNP 715 Module 3 sample is the Healthy People 2030 progress assessment, the synchronous team discussion in Dynamics and Principles of Information in Healthcare, a Doctor of Nursing Practice course at ASU. ASU DNP 715 asks teams to analyze public health datasets and decide, in a 15-minute presentation, whether a Healthy People 2030 objective is on track. The composite team takes the objective to reduce adult obesity. Its slides compare the baseline, the latest national estimate and the target, describe the trend, use state surveillance data to show geographic spread, examine differences by sex and severity, and conclude that the objective is not on track, with the reasons and what nurses can do.

CourseDNP 715 Dynamics and Principles of Information in Healthcare
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeTeam data presentation with slides and notes
LengthAbout 456 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 715 Module 3

1

Off Track and Drifting: Is the Healthy People 2030 Adult Obesity Objective Within Reach?

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

DNP 715: Dynamics and Principles of Information in Healthcare

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title gives the team's verdict first, which a data presentation to busy listeners should do.
2

Off Track and Drifting: Is the Healthy People 2030 Adult Obesity Objective Within Reach?

The Objective

Healthy People 2030 objective NWS-03 aims to reduce the proportion of adults aged 20 and older with obesity. Its baseline was 38.6% in 2013 to 2016, and its target is 36.0% (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.). The data source is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which measures height and weight directly.

What this page is doingOpening with the objective's code, baseline, target and data source anchors every later slide to the measure the objective itself uses.
3

Slides and Notes

SlideContentSpeaker notes
1Title and verdict"Our objective is off track."
2The objectiveBaseline 38.6%, target 36.0%, measured by NHANES.
3Latest estimateIn August 2021 to August 2023, 40.3% of adults had obesity and 9.4% had severe obesity (Emmerich et al., 2024). The latest estimate sits above the baseline, not below it.
4The gapTo reach 36.0% by 2030, adult obesity would have to fall by more than 4 percentage points in a few years, a faster decline than any recorded in the survey's history.
5TrendObesity rose from the 2013 to 2016 baseline period to 2017 to 2020 and remains about 40% in the latest cycle; severe obesity has continued to increase over the past decade (Emmerich et al., 2024).
6Disparities: sex and severitySevere obesity is markedly more common in women than in men (Emmerich et al., 2024).
7Disparities: agePrevalence is highest in middle-aged adults and lower in younger adults, so prevention must reach people in their 20s and 30s before weight accumulates.
8GeographyBRFSS state figures, built on what adults report about their own height and weight, show adult obesity at or above 35% in many states, concentrated in the South and Midwest (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n.d.).
9Data cautionsNHANES measures directly but has smaller samples and paused during the pandemic; BRFSS covers every state but self-report underestimates obesity, so its numbers should not be compared with NHANES directly.
10VerdictNot on track. The most recent national estimate is higher than the baseline and the target requires an unprecedented decline.
11Implications for nursesScreen and counsel using the body mass index alongside waist and risk factors; refer to intensive behavioral programs; advocate for food and activity environments; follow the newer medications' access and equity issues.
12QuestionsInvite discussion.
What this page is doingSlide 1 states the verdict before any data, and slide 9 names the limits of each survey, so the group shows it can synthesize two sources without treating self-reported and measured obesity as the same number.
4

How We Reached the Verdict

We compared the latest estimate with both the baseline and the target, checked whether the change was in the right direction, and asked what rate of decline would be needed. All three tests pointed the same way.

Limits

Two survey cycles and a pandemic interruption limit trend analysis, and BRFSS and NHANES are not directly comparable. Our verdict rests on the national measured data the objective itself uses.

What this page is doingA short limits section shows the team knows how far its verdict reaches, which faculty read as data literacy rather than hedging.
5

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Adult obesity prevalence maps. Retrieved October 4, 2026, from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html

Emmerich, S. D., Fryar, C. D., Stierman, B., & Ogden, C. L. (2024). Obesity and severe obesity prevalence in adults: United States, August 2021-August 2023 (NCHS Data Brief No. 508). National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc/159281

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity: NWS-03. Healthy People 2030. Retrieved October 4, 2026, from https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/overweight-and-obesity/reduce-proportion-adults-obesity-nws-03

Reading the DNP 715 Module 3 assignment instructions

The posted syllabus grades this synchronous team assignment at 50 points. Groups work with several public datasets, for example BRFSS, NHANES and CDC surveillance systems, to assess whether a selected Healthy People 2030 objective is on track to meet its 2030 target. Students must synthesize data from at least two or three sources, examine trends and disparities, make a supported determination about progress and present the findings in 15 minutes. Find your objective's baseline, target and official data source first, then add sources that show trends and disparities. Download the data tables or briefs early, since some public datasets are large and slow to navigate during a busy week.

Inside the DNP 715 Module 3 example

The presentation states its verdict on the first slide and then proves it. It reports the objective's baseline, target and data source exactly, compares the latest estimate with both, and shows the size of the remaining gap. Trends and disparities each get their own slides. A second data system adds geography, and a cautions slide explains why the two systems cannot be compared directly, which shows data literacy. The verdict slide restates the three tests used. A slide on implications for nurses connects the data to practice, and the notes explain how the team reasoned. The cautions slide explains why two surveys cannot be compared directly, which is the kind of data judgment the assignment is designed to build.

Reading the DNP 715 Module 3 grading rubric

Faculty score these presentations on getting the objective's baseline, target and data source right; synthesis of at least two or three datasets; analysis of trends and disparities; a clear, supported determination of progress; recognition of data limitations; and a well-timed, organized presentation. Faculty look for teams that compare like with like and explain why data systems differ. A clear verdict backed by its reasons beats a hedge. Implications for nursing practice show purpose. Balanced speaking roles and staying within 15 minutes matter. Presentations that state a clear verdict and then defend it with three simple tests are easier for faculty to follow than ones that list numbers without a conclusion.

DNP 715 Module 3 help: mistakes that cost marks

Teams often present numbers from different surveys as if they were comparable. Note how each dataset measures the outcome and keep comparisons within a source. Another weakness is a verdict without a test; compare the latest value with the baseline and the target, and calculate the change needed. Cite the year and survey cycle for every number. If you would like help analyzing your Healthy People 2030 objective, send the objective and your team's data to the desk. Rehearse to 13 minutes so questions fit, and assign one member to answer data questions. Assign one member to keep a source list with the survey cycle for every figure on the slides.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DNP 715 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

DNP 715 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DNP 715 Module 3 sample paper?

The Healthy People 2030 progress assessment above is complete: the adult obesity objective tested against NHANES and BRFSS data, with trends, disparities, data cautions and a verdict.

How long is the DNP 715 Healthy People 2030 presentation?

The syllabus calls for a 15-minute presentation of the team's findings.

How many data sources does the DNP 715 assessment require?

At least two or three sources, such as BRFSS, NHANES and CDC surveillance systems.

What is the Healthy People 2030 adult obesity target?

Objective NWS-03 aims to reduce adult obesity from a 38.6% baseline to 36.0%.

Why can't BRFSS and NHANES obesity rates be compared directly?

BRFSS relies on self-reported height and weight, which underestimates obesity, while NHANES measures directly.