DNP 661 Module 5 Final Portfolio: Ethical Practice in Action Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This DNP 661 Module 5 sample is the Final Portfolio, Ethical Practice in Action, which closes Ethics and Advanced Nursing Practice in ASU's Doctor of Nursing Practice. ASU DNP 661 weights the portfolio at a quarter of the grade and sets it in the final weeks on reflection and application of ethical decision making. Her Safford clinic and her adult-gerontology track supply the material as the composite student gathers the term's work into five parts: a revised moral compass, a personal decision process, three commitments drawn from her papers on AI and on prescribing for people she knows, an escalation script tested at the second immersion, and a one-year plan. Each part shows what changed in her thinking and names evidence she will keep.

CourseDNP 661 Ethics and Advanced Nursing Practice
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeFinal ethics portfolio
LengthAbout 844 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 661 Module 5

1

Ethical Practice in Action: A Portfolio for My First Year as a Rural Nurse Practitioner

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

DNP 661: Ethics and Advanced Nursing Practice

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title uses the assignment's own phrase and places the portfolio in a specific future role, which signals that the work is forward-looking rather than a summary of the term.
2

Ethical Practice in Action: A Portfolio for My First Year as a Rural Nurse Practitioner

Purpose of This Portfolio

This portfolio gathers the semester's work into a set of tools I will carry into my first year as a nurse practitioner in Safford. Each section shows what I wrote or practiced, what changed in my thinking and how I will apply it. I want to leave the course carrying habits I can check, rather than a recap of it.

Part 1: My Moral Compass, Revised

In my first assignment, I named three values: a patient's right to understand, persistence for a patient's safety and respect for informed refusal. All three still hold, but the term added a fourth. My AI paper showed me that the tools and systems I work within can be unjust even when every clinician means well, as when an algorithm meant to identify patients needing extra care underestimated the illness of Black patients because it predicted cost (Obermeyer et al., 2019). My fourth value is attention to fairness in the systems I use. My original compass pointed at single encounters; the revised one also points at structures.

What this page is doingRevisiting the first assignment and naming exactly what was added shows growth across the semester, which is what a culminating portfolio is meant to demonstrate.
3

Part 2: My Decision Process

Across the term I tried several approaches. The one I will use combines the principlist lens with a short sequence I can apply under time pressure (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019):

1. Pause and name what feels wrong.

2. Get the facts I am missing, including what the patient understands and wants.

3. Name the obligations in tension and the people affected.

4. List at least two options, including one I had not considered.

5. Choose, say why, and plan how to tell the people affected.

6. Afterward, write two lines about what I would do differently.

The sixth step matters most for me. Moral residue builds when hard situations are left unexamined (Epstein & Hamric, 2009), and a short written review turns a bad day into something I can learn from.

Part 3: Three Commitments for Practice

CommitmentWhere it came fromHow I will keep itEvidence I will collect
Record my own impression before opening any diagnostic app or decision supportAssignment 2, automation biasHabit at every visit where a tool is usedMonthly self-audit of ten visits
Refuse to prescribe outside a visit, with one narrow exception for bridge suppliesAssignment 3, family and friendsWritten policy and a standard scriptLog of requests and how each was handled
Use a professional interpreter for every consent conversationMoral compass narrativeInterpreter line saved on my phone and in the templateNote in each consent record
What this page is doingEach commitment is traced to the assignment that produced it and paired with evidence, which turns the portfolio from reflection into accountable practice.
4

Part 4: An Escalation Script, Tested

At the second immersion, we practiced difficult conversations in pairs. I chose the situation that defeated me as a new graduate: a clinician who dismisses a concern. My partner played a tired hospitalist. My first attempt was apologetic and vague. After feedback, I used a structured version: state my concern and the specific finding, say what I am asking for, and if refused, ask what would change their mind and state that I will escalate. My partner said the second version was harder to dismiss because it ended with a clear next step.

Rushton (2016) describes moral resilience as something that can be built through practice and preparation rather than a trait one either has or lacks. Rehearsing the script is my attempt to build it. I will practice it with my preceptor before my first independent shift.

Part 5: My First-Year Plan

TimeActionHow I will know
Months 1 to 3Share my prescribing policy with clinic staff; start the automation bias self-auditStaff can describe the policy; ten visits audited each month
Months 4 to 6Ask the clinic to review the skin lesion app's ratings against biopsy results by skin toneReview completed and shared with the medical director
Months 7 to 9Join the regional hospital's ethics committee as a community clinicianMembership confirmed; one case discussion attended
Months 10 to 12Repeat my compass narrative in one page and compare it with this portfolioWritten comparison filed with my professional development record

What I Am Still Unsure About

Two questions remain open. I do not yet know how to balance my prescribing policy against the access problems that make people ask in the first place; a refusal is easier to defend in a city with urgent care on every corner. I also do not know how much I can change a clinic's fifteen-minute schedule as a new employee. I have chosen to keep both questions in the portfolio rather than pretend they are settled, and the ethics committee is where I hope to test them.

Conclusion

This course gave me words for instincts I already had and showed me where those instincts stop. The portfolio turns that into practice: a revised compass, a decision process, three commitments with evidence, a rehearsed script and a dated plan. If I keep the evidence, I will be able to see whether I practice ethics in action or only on paper.

What this page is doingNaming unresolved questions keeps the portfolio honest, and the dated plan with measures shows faculty how the student will keep learning after the course ends.
5

References

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Epstein, E. G., & Hamric, A. B. (2009). Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 20(4), 330-342. https://doi.org/10.1086/JCE200920406

Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342

Rushton, C. H. (2016). Moral resilience: A capacity for navigating moral distress in critical care. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016275

What the DNP 661 Module 5 instructions ask for

The posted syllabus places the Final Portfolio, Ethical Practice in Action, in Weeks 15 to 17 under reflection and application of ethical decision making, and it carries 25% of the course grade, more than any other single assessment. Canvas sets out the required sections, the format and the rubric, so read them before planning. The title suggests a culminating collection that shows how you will apply the course in practice, drawing on your assignments, the immersions and your own reflection. Expect to revisit your earlier work, show what changed, present a decision approach you will use and set out commitments for your advanced practice role. Keep the earlier assignments and immersion notes at hand, because the portfolio is strongest when it quotes your own words from them.

Inside the DNP 661 Module 5 example

Five parts follow a brief opening statement of purpose. The first revisits the moral compass narrative and adds one new value, with the source that prompted it. The second presents a six-step decision process with a reason for its final step. A table then lists three practice commitments, each traced to an earlier assignment and paired with evidence the writer will collect. The fourth part describes an escalation script practiced at the immersion, including what changed after feedback. A dated first-year plan with measures follows, then a section naming questions the writer has not resolved. Four sources support the reflection, and the conclusion restates the portfolio's purpose in two sentences.

DNP 661 Module 5 rubric: what earns full marks

As the largest assessment in the course, the portfolio is likely graded on integration of course content, evidence of growth, quality of reflection, practical application to the advanced practice role, specificity of plans and scholarly writing. Growth is most convincing when the portfolio compares later thinking with an earlier assignment. Application earns credit when commitments are concrete and tied to a source in the course. Plans should have dates and measures. Honest acknowledgment of open questions shows mature reflection rather than weakness. Organization matters in a portfolio, so clear headings and tables help faculty find each required element. Citations should support claims rather than decorate them.

DNP 661 Module 5 help: mistakes that cost marks

Portfolios lose points most often by retelling the course week after week. Organize around what you will do differently and use the modules as evidence. Another is vague commitments, such as "be more ethical"; name the behavior and how you will check it. Do not skip the immersion work if the rubric asks for it, since it is often where practice shows. Leave room for questions you have not settled. If you would like help building a portfolio from your own assignments, send them with the Canvas instructions and a sample can be prepared around your work. Allow time to reread your earlier papers before you start. Check that every table in the portfolio has a heading and a source where one is needed.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DNP 661 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

DNP 661 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DNP 661 Module 5 sample paper?

The portfolio above is a complete DNP 661 Final Portfolio sample, with a revised moral compass, a decision process, three commitments with evidence, an escalation script and a first-year plan.

How much is the DNP 661 final portfolio worth?

The posted syllabus weights the Final Portfolio, Ethical Practice in Action, at 25% of the course grade, the largest single assessment.

What goes in an ethics portfolio for a DNP course?

Expect revised reflections on earlier work, a decision-making approach, commitments for practice and a plan, with the exact sections set by the Canvas instructions.

Should I include the immersion in my DNP 661 portfolio?

If the rubric asks for it, yes. Describing what you practiced and what changed after feedback shows ethics in action.

How do I show growth in a final reflective portfolio?

Compare what you wrote at the start of the term with what you think now, and name the source or experience that changed your view.