DNP 703 Module 3 Critical Analysis Essay Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This DNP 703 Module 3 sample is Paper 2, the critical analysis essay in Innovation in Communication: Scholarly and Professional Writing, part of the Doctor of Nursing Practice at ASU. ASU DNP 703 spends this module on critical inquiry and the analysis of literary works and grades the essay at 100 points. Because the assigned works vary by term, the composite writer analyzes Charlotte Perkins Gilman's 1892 story "The Yellow Wall-Paper," a public-domain work often read in the health humanities. Her thesis is that the story uses the narrator's voice, the room and the prescribed rest cure to show how a clinician's certainty can silence a patient. She supports it with evidence from the text, answers a competing reading and draws lessons for nurses.

CourseDNP 703 Innovation in Communication Scholarly and Professional Writing
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeCritical analysis essay of a literary work
LengthAbout 557 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 703 Module 3

1

The Patient Who Was Not Heard: A Critical Analysis of Gilman's "The Yellow Wall-Paper"

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

DNP 703: Innovation in Communication: Scholarly and Professional Writing

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the essay's reading of the story as a claim, which a critical analysis needs from its first line.
2

The Patient Who Was Not Heard: A Critical Analysis of Gilman's "The Yellow Wall-Paper"

Introduction

"The Yellow Wall-Paper" is narrated by a woman whose physician husband prescribes rest, isolation and a ban on writing after the birth of her child (Gilman, 1892). Over the course of the story, she becomes absorbed in the wallpaper of her room and finally loses touch with reality. The story is usually read as a protest against the treatment of women. I argue that it is also a precise portrait of a clinical relationship in which the patient's own account is treated as a symptom rather than as evidence, and that its form, a secret journal, makes the reader the listener the narrator never had.

The Voice No One Hears

The narrator's journal is full of observations her husband dismisses. She tells him she is not getting better, and he answers that she is, and that he is the doctor. Her doubts are framed in apologetic phrases, as if she expects to be corrected. The effect is that the reader hears what the husband refuses to: a patient describing her own decline accurately while being told she is wrong. The story shows that silencing need not be cruel; the husband is affectionate and sure of his care.

What this page is doingEach body section opens with a claim about the story and supports it with specific details from the text, the basic move of critical analysis.
3

The Room as Treatment

The room itself is part of the prescription. It has barred windows and a bed fixed to the floor, and the narrator is kept there because the husband believes it is best for her. The wallpaper, which she first hates and then studies obsessively, becomes the only outlet for a mind denied work and company. Read clinically, the room shows what happens when a treatment is designed without the patient: it removes the activities she says help her and replaces them with an environment she says harms her.

The Rest Cure and Its Certainty

The treatment in the story echoes the rest cure that physicians prescribed to women in Gilman's time, which required inactivity and forbade intellectual work. The husband never questions it. His certainty, not his malice, drives the tragedy. The story's ending, in which the narrator creeps around the room and the husband faints, reverses their positions: the confident clinician collapses, and the patient, at last, cannot be ignored.

A Competing Reading

Some readers see the story chiefly as a tale of madness or of the supernatural, with the wallpaper as a haunting. That reading explains the story's dread but not its details: the repeated dismissals, the banned writing, the husband's professional authority. Those details point to a social cause, not a ghost.

What this page is doingNaming a competing reading and explaining what it leaves out shows the analysis was tested against another interpretation.
4

Lessons for Nursing

Charon (2001) argues that clinicians need narrative competence, the ability to absorb, interpret and be moved by patients' stories. Gilman's narrator offers exactly the story her husband needed to hear. For nurses, the lesson is that the patient's account is data. When a patient says a treatment is making her worse, the first response should be curiosity, not reassurance. Carper (1978) would call this personal and esthetic knowing: meeting the patient as a person and perceiving what matters to her.

Conclusion

"The Yellow Wall-Paper" endures because its central failure is still possible: a caring clinician, sure of the right treatment, who does not listen. The journal form lets readers do what the husband would not. Reading it critically is practice for listening better.

What this page is doingThe conclusion returns to the thesis about listening and ties it to the reader's own clinical practice, which links a literary essay to the course's professional purpose.
5

References

Carper, B. A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197810000-00004

Charon, R. (2001). Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA, 286(15), 1897-1902. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.15.1897

Gilman, C. P. (1892). The yellow wall-paper. The New England Magazine, 11(5), 647-656.

DNP 703 Module 3 instructions, in plain terms

The posted syllabus grades Paper 2, the Critical Analysis Essay, at 100 points and 15% of the course. It falls in Module 3, Weeks 7 to 9, whose lessons are critical inquiry and analysis of literary works, principles of critical analysis and scholarly discourse in writing, with an immersion during the module. Expect to analyze an assigned or approved work, state an arguable thesis, support it with evidence from the text, consider another reading, and write in formal APA style on the five-paragraph foundation the course builds. Faculty feedback on Paper 1 should shape this one, so review it before you draft. Confirm the assigned work in Canvas. If you choose your own work, pick one rich enough to support several paragraphs of analysis and confirm it with faculty first.

Inside the DNP 703 Module 3 example

The essay opens with a short summary and an arguable thesis that goes beyond the usual reading. Each body section analyzes one element of the story, the voice, the room and the treatment, and connects it back to the thesis. Evidence is drawn from the text by describing specific moments rather than retelling the plot. A section answers a competing reading and explains why the evidence favors the writer's interpretation. A closing section applies the analysis to nursing through a source on narrative competence, and the conclusion restates the thesis in new words. The structure keeps the five-paragraph spine while giving each element room. Quotations are kept short and few, so the analysis stays in the writer's voice while the text still supplies the evidence.

Where the marks sit in the DNP 703 Module 3 rubric

Faculty score a critical analysis on its arguable thesis; analysis rather than summary; specific evidence from the work; logical organization; consideration of other interpretations; scholarly tone and voice; and correct APA style. Faculty look for students who explain how a work produces its meaning, not just what happens in it. Connecting the analysis to professional practice shows why the course pairs literature with nursing. Acknowledging a competing reading and answering it shows critical inquiry. Clear topic sentences that state claims, not plot points, earn credit. Reference the edition you read. Essays that move from close reading to a larger claim about care or communication show the scholarly discourse the module teaches.

DNP 703 Module 3 help with common mistakes

The most frequent weakness is retelling the story with a thesis attached at the start. Make every paragraph argue a point and use the text as evidence. Another is a thesis no one would dispute; choose a claim a reasonable reader could challenge. Keep plot summary to two or three sentences. Use present tense to discuss literature. Cite the work and any sources in APA format. If you would like help with your critical analysis essay, send the assigned work and the prompt to the desk. Reread the work once with your thesis in mind and mark only passages that support or challenge it. Write the counterargument section before the conclusion, so the final paragraph can answer it.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DNP 703 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers

DNP 703 Module 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DNP 703 Module 3 sample paper?

The critical analysis essay above is complete: Gilman's "The Yellow Wall-Paper" analyzed for voice, setting and treatment, with a competing reading and lessons for nursing.

How many points is DNP 703 Paper 2?

The Critical Analysis Essay is worth 100 points, 15% of the course grade.

What does DNP 703 Module 3 cover?

Critical inquiry and analysis of literary works, principles of critical analysis and scholarly discourse in writing.

What makes a good thesis for a critical analysis essay?

A specific, arguable claim about how the work creates meaning, which the essay supports with evidence.

Why do DNP students analyze literature?

It builds critical reading and argument skills and, in works about illness and care, sharpens attention to patients' experiences.