| Course | DNP 707 Disseminating Evidence to Advance Best Practice in Healthcare and Health Policy |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Five-minute talk script with slide plan |
| Length | About 492 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 707 Module 6
The Second Fracture Is Preventable: A Five-Minute DNP Talk on Fracture Liaison Care
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 707: Disseminating Evidence to Advance Best Practice in Healthcare and Health Policy
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
The Second Fracture Is Preventable: A Five-Minute DNP Talk on Fracture Liaison Care
Slide Plan and Script
| Time | Slide | Spoken text |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00 | Photo of a porch step | Rosa is 71. Last spring she missed the bottom step, put out her hand and broke her wrist. She got a cast, a sling and a follow-up visit. Nobody asked why a fall from standing height broke a bone. |
| 0:30 | "1 in 3" | Here is why that matters. A fracture like Rosa's is often the first sign of osteoporosis, and the risk of another fracture is highest in the next two years. Yet national claims data show that after a hip fracture, fewer than a third of patients go on to take bone-building medication, and the rate dropped over a decade (Solomon et al., 2014). |
| 1:15 | Timeline graphic | Three recent developments are changing this. First, the national screening recommendation was updated in 2025. It still calls for screening women 65 and older and younger postmenopausal women at higher risk, and it notes that the evidence for screening men remains insufficient (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2025). Screening finds people before the first fracture. Fracture liaison services find them after it, which is where my project sits. |
| 2:00 | Bar chart of returns | Second, we now know these services pay for themselves. A 2024 review of published programs found that most returned more money than they cost (Xu et al., 2024). That turns a quality argument into a business case. |
| 2:30 | Screenshot of a record alert | Third, case finding is being automated. Instead of relying on a busy surgeon to remember, electronic records can flag every adult over 50 with a fracture code. Combined with nurse follow-up, that is the model that reduces second fractures and deaths (Li et al., 2021). |
| 3:00 | Before-and-after bars | In our orthopedic clinic, we put those pieces together. A nurse used a record checklist, ordered the bone scan, taught patients and wrote to their primary care clinicians. Over six months, treatment starts rose from about 7 in 100 patients to 32 in 100. |
| 3:45 | "64%" | Not everything worked. Only two thirds of patients answered the three-month call. Next we will try text reminders and evening calling hours. |
| 4:15 | Rosa's wrist, healed | If you work anywhere a broken bone walks in, ask one more question: why did this break? Then make sure someone owns the answer. |
| 4:45 | Contact slide | Thank you. |
Trends and Innovations Covered
The talk names three developments: the 2025 screening recommendation, return-on-investment evidence and automated case finding through the electronic record. Each is linked back to the project so the talk does not drift into a lecture.
What Changed After the Practice Run
My first run lasted seven minutes. I cut a slide on bone biology and a slide listing all my measures, and kept only the treatment number and the follow-up number. A classmate said Rosa's name made the talk memorable, so I brought her back at the end.
References
Li, N., Hiligsmann, M., Boonen, A., van Oostwaard, M. M., de Bot, R. T. A. L., Wyers, C. E., Bours, S. P. G., & van den Bergh, J. P. (2021). The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International, 32(8), 1517-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05911-9
Solomon, D. H., Johnston, S. S., Boytsov, N. N., McMorrow, D., Lane, J. M., & Krohn, K. D. (2014). Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 29(9), 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2202
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2025). Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 333(6), 498-508. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.27154
Xu, L., Zhao, T., Perry, L., Frost, S., Di Tanna, G., Wang, S., Chen, M., Kolt, G., Jan, S., & Si, L. (2024). Return on investment of fracture liaison services: A systematic review and analysis. Osteoporosis International, 35(6), 951-969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07027-2
What the DNP 707 Module 6 instructions ask for
The posted syllabus places the DNP Talk in Week 9, worth 100 points as an individual video with a peer review component. It is a five-minute recorded presentation of your project topic that must include recent trends and innovations, not only your own project. Think of it as a short public talk: one idea, a story, a few strong visuals and a close that asks the audience to do something. Expect peers to review your video using a rubric in Canvas, and to review theirs in turn. Respect the time limit; five minutes is about 650 to 700 spoken words. Captions help viewers watching without sound. Upload the video in a format the course platform accepts and check that it plays before the deadline.
How this DNP 707 Module 6 example is built
Script and slides are paired row by row with a running clock, which proves the talk fits five minutes. It opens and closes with the same patient, which gives the talk a frame. Recent trends and innovations are given their own segment and each is cited, then tied back to the project so the talk keeps one argument. The writer's results appear as one number, with the weaker result stated honestly. Each slide carries a single image or figure. A closing note explains what was cut after a timed practice run, showing the editing that short talks require. The trends segment cites recent sources, which shows the talk reflects the current state of the field rather than the year the project began.
Where the marks sit in the DNP 707 Module 6 rubric
DNP Talks are usually graded on a clear central message, coverage of recent trends and innovations, accurate use of evidence, effective visuals, engaging delivery, and staying within five minutes. Peer reviewers tend to reward talks that feel like a conversation rather than a lecture. Slides with one idea each are easier to follow on video than slides full of text. Honest mention of what did not work builds credibility. A clear call to action gives the talk a purpose beyond the grade. Faculty also notice whether claims are supported, so keep citations on slides or in a closing reference slide. Peers often comment on energy and pace, so vary your voice and pause before the key result.
DNP 707 Module 6 help from the desk
Talks often run long because students try to present the whole project. Pick one message and cut everything that does not serve it. Another common trouble is skipping the trends and innovations the assignment requires; give them their own segment. Write for the ear: short sentences, concrete words, no acronyms. Time a full practice run and cut until you have thirty seconds to spare. If you would like help scripting your DNP Talk or planning slides, send your project summary and the time limit to the desk. Record in a quiet room with your face lit from the front. Leave out anything you would need more than one sentence to explain.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 707 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 707 Module 1: DNP Project Introduction
- DNP 707 Module 2: DNP Project Elevator Speech
- DNP 707 Module 3: Ethics in Publication Discussion
- DNP 707 Module 4: DNP Abstract Critique
- DNP 707 Module 5: DNP Project Abstract
- DNP 707 Module 7: DNP Project Poster
- DNP 707 Module 8: Executive Summary and Site Presentation
- DNP 671 Module 7: Discussion: Interviewing Older Adults and Patients With Psychosis
- DNP 649 Module 2: Reproductive Physiology Case Study: PCOS
- DNP 625 Module 1: Clinical Vignette Discussion Board 1: Cardiovascular
- DNP 716 Module 5: DNP Project Poster
DNP 707 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 707 Module 6 sample paper?
The DNP Talk above is complete: a five-minute script with a slide plan on fracture liaison care, recent trends and innovations, project results and a closing call to action.
How long is the DNP 707 DNP Talk?
The syllabus describes a 5-minute video presentation, roughly 650 to 700 spoken words.
What must the DNP 707 DNP Talk include?
Your project topic plus recent trends and innovations in the field.
How many points is the DNP Talk in DNP 707?
It carries 100 points and includes peer review.
How many slides should a five-minute talk have?
About one slide per 30 to 45 seconds, each carrying one image or number.