| Course | DNP 707 Disseminating Evidence to Advance Best Practice in Healthcare and Health Policy |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | DNP project introduction and dissemination ideas |
| Length | About 434 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 707 Module 1
From Cast Room to Conference Room: Introducing a Fracture Liaison Project and Its First Dissemination Ideas
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 707: Disseminating Evidence to Advance Best Practice in Healthcare and Health Policy
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
From Cast Room to Conference Room: Introducing a Fracture Liaison Project and Its First Dissemination Ideas
The Project in One Paragraph
Patients in our clinic who broke a wrist, ankle or hip in a simple fall almost never left with a plan for their bones. A chart review before the project found treatment started for only 7% of them, a pattern that mirrors national data showing most hip fracture patients never begin osteoporosis medication (Solomon et al., 2014). With the clinic's surgeons and nurse manager, I built a pathway in which a registered nurse identifies eligible patients at the first visit, orders bone density testing under a standing order, teaches the patient and writes to the primary care clinician, then calls at three months.
What Changed
Comparing the six months before launch with the six months after, the share of eligible patients who began treatment rose from 11 of 150 to 47 of 146, and completed bone density tests rose from 19 to 89. Knowledge scores on the revised Osteoporosis Knowledge Test improved for the 104 patients who took it twice. These are preliminary figures from one clinic without a control group, so I describe them as improvement, not proof. Larger studies link fracture liaison services to fewer repeat fractures and deaths (Li et al., 2021), an outcome our six months of data point toward but cannot show.
Who Needs to Hear It
| Audience | Main message | Channel | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinic staff and surgeons | The pathway works and needs a permanent owner | Staff meeting and a one-page summary | Week 3 |
| Health system quality leaders | Results, cost and a case for expanding to the satellite office | Executive summary and site presentation | Weeks 13 to 14 |
| Orthopedic and primary care nurses nationally | A nurse can close the treatment gap without new hires | Poster, then a journal manuscript | Poster day, then summer |
| Patients and families | A broken bone after a fall is a warning sign worth acting on | Handout and clinic social media post | After site approval |
Starting Ideas and Open Questions
Researchers tend to aim dissemination at other researchers through journals and conferences, while practitioners and policymakers who could act on the findings receive less attention (Brownson et al., 2013). I want my plan to reach the clinic and the system first, because they decide whether the pathway survives. For the specialty audience, I am weighing an orthopedic nursing journal against a nurse practitioner journal. My questions for the group: is a single-clinic quality improvement project a better fit for a poster or a full manuscript, and which results would a busy surgeon want on the first slide?
References
Brownson, R. C., Jacobs, J. A., Tabak, R. G., Hoehner, C. M., & Stamatakis, K. A. (2013). Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: Findings from a national survey in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1693-1699. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301165
Li, N., Hiligsmann, M., Boonen, A., van Oostwaard, M. M., de Bot, R. T. A. L., Wyers, C. E., Bours, S. P. G., & van den Bergh, J. P. (2021). The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International, 32(8), 1517-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05911-9
Solomon, D. H., Johnston, S. S., Boytsov, N. N., McMorrow, D., Lane, J. M., & Krohn, K. D. (2014). Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 29(9), 1929-1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2202
Reading the DNP 707 Module 1 assignment instructions
The posted syllabus lists the Project Introduction as a 10-point immersion activity: a short paper plus a small group presentation that introduces your DNP project to faculty and classmates, with your first thoughts on dissemination. It falls in the opening block of weeks on publication and presentation fundamentals, alongside a project summary and dissemination plan, an elevator speech and a learning community ethics discussion. DNP 704 and DNP 705 are prerequisites, so most students arrive with a finished or nearly finished project. Bring a summary you can present in about three minutes and a first list of audiences. Canvas holds the template and any page limit. The first immersion is usually in person, so bring a printed copy for each member of your small group.
How this DNP 707 Module 1 example is built
The summary moves in four short steps: the problem in local numbers, the change, the preliminary results and the people who need to know. Results are given as counts with their denominators so peers can judge them, and the limits of a single-site project are named in the same breath. The audience table gives each group one message, one channel and a time, which turns vague dissemination intentions into a plan the group can react to. A survey of researchers explains why practice audiences come first. The paper ends with two real questions for the small group, which makes the immersion discussion useful to the writer rather than a formality. Because every later assignment reuses these numbers, the introduction also fixes the figures that the abstract, talk, poster and briefing will repeat.
Where the marks sit in the DNP 707 Module 1 rubric
Introductions of this kind are judged on whether peers can understand the project quickly, whether results are reported honestly with their limits, and whether the dissemination ideas match audiences to messages and channels. Faculty look for students who think beyond the poster and the journal to the site and the public. A concise paper that leaves room for discussion fits the immersion format. Students who state the preliminary nature of their numbers show the integrity the later ethics discussion expects. Questions posed to the group show that the student is ready to use feedback. A table keeps the plan readable when presented aloud. Naming a date for each audience, even a rough one, tells faculty the plan is meant to happen.
DNP 707 Module 1 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students often overload the introduction with background from DNP 704 and leave no room for results or audiences. Keep the background to two sentences and spend the space on what happened and who should hear it. Another frequent problem is listing every possible channel; pick the few you will actually use. Report counts, not only percentages, so readers see the size of the project. Bring one question you genuinely want answered. If you want help turning your project into a one-page introduction, send your DNP 705 materials and results to the desk. Rehearse the spoken version once with a timer before the immersion. Ask your project chair which results are cleared for sharing before you present them to classmates.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 707 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 707 Module 2: DNP Project Elevator Speech
- DNP 707 Module 3: Ethics in Publication Discussion
- DNP 707 Module 4: DNP Abstract Critique
- DNP 707 Module 5: DNP Project Abstract
- DNP 707 Module 6: DNP Talk Presentation
- DNP 707 Module 7: DNP Project Poster
- DNP 707 Module 8: Executive Summary and Site Presentation
- DNP 709 Module 3: Faces of Innovation Discussion
- DNP 713 Module 2: Organizational Culture Theories Discussion
- DNP 704 Module 4: Evidence-Based Practice Final Paper (Paper 4)
- DNP 647 Module 3: Case Study 3: Gastrointestinal Disorders (Celiac Disease)
DNP 707 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 707 Module 1 sample paper?
The Project Introduction above is complete: a fracture liaison project summarized in one page with preliminary results, an audience table and questions for the immersion group.
How many points is the DNP 707 Project Introduction?
It is a 10-point immersion activity in the posted syllabus.
What goes in the DNP 707 Project Introduction?
A short description of your DNP project for faculty and peers, including your initial ideas for dissemination.
Do I need final results for the DNP 707 Project Introduction?
No. Preliminary results are fine if you label them as preliminary and state their limits.
Who should a DNP project be disseminated to?
Start with the site and system that can act on it, then the specialty, then patients and the public.