NUR 671 Module 6 Instructional Unit Portfolio Part 3: Microlesson and Peer Coaching Example

Reviewed by Ingrid Vasterling, MSN, RN Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This NUR 671 Module 6 sample is Part 3 of the Instructional Unit Portfolio, the microlesson and peer coaching, in Teaching in Nursing and Health-Related Settings, part of ASU's MS in Nursing. For ASU NUR 671, students record a brief teaching session from their unit and then give constructive feedback on classmates' teaching using the course's peer coaching tool and guidelines for effective praise. The composite perinatal educator presents the plan and script for an eight-minute microlesson from her hand expression unit: an opening problem, a short explanation, a model demonstration and a teach-back check. Part 3B is her written coaching feedback on a classmate's microlesson about insulin pen technique, specific and behavior-based in each area.

CourseNUR 671 Teaching in Nursing and Health-Related Settings
ModuleModule 6
Paper typeMicrolesson teaching plan with script and peer coaching feedback
LengthAbout 752 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramMS in Nursing
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 671 Module 6

1

Eight Minutes on the First Drops: A Microlesson Script and Peer Coaching Feedback for an Instructional Unit on Hand Expression

Student Name

Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University

NUR 671: Teaching in Nursing and Health-Related Settings

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title gives the length and topic of the microlesson and names both parts of the assignment, the teaching and the feedback to a peer.
2

Eight Minutes on the First Drops: A Microlesson Script and Peer Coaching Feedback for an Instructional Unit on Hand Expression

Part 3A: Microlesson Plan

Topic: Coaching a mother in hand expression of colostrum (segment of the full 90-minute unit).

Learners: Newly hired mother-baby nurses (for the recording, two classmates played learners).

Length: 8 minutes.

Objectives addressed: Objective 1 (explain when and why hand expression helps) and Objective 2 (demonstrate the technique).

Materials: Breast model, printed technique card, colostrum volume image, timer.

Teaching behaviors I set out to show: a problem-centered opening, explanation in short segments, demonstration with narration, checking understanding with teach-back and specific feedback.

Part 3A: Microlesson Script

Minute 0-1, opening problem. "It is 3 a.m. Your patient's baby is 18 hours old, sleepy and has fed twice in six hours. She says, 'I don't think I have any milk.' What would you say to her?" I paused and let both learners answer before going on.

Minute 1-3, short explanation. "In the first day, colostrum comes in small amounts, often only a few milliliters at a feed, which matches a newborn's small stomach. Hand expression lets her collect those drops to give by spoon. In one trial of mothers whose term babies were feeding poorly, those taught hand expression were more likely to still be breastfeeding two months later than those given a pump (Flaherman et al., 2012). And it needs no equipment, which matters at 3 a.m."

Minute 3-5, demonstration. Using the model, I narrated each step: wash hands; gentle breast massage; place thumb and fingers in a C shape a few centimeters back from the nipple; press back toward the chest, compress the fingers together, release; rotate around the breast; collect drops in a spoon. "Notice I am not sliding my fingers. Sliding hurts." I also showed the hands-off option: guiding the mother's own hand while I demonstrate on the model.

Minute 5-7, guided practice and teach-back. Each learner tried the technique on the model while I watched. I then asked, "Tell me how you would explain this to your patient in two sentences," and corrected one learner who described squeezing the nipple.

Minute 7-8, close. "When does hand expression help, and what is the one movement to avoid?" Both answered. I thanked them and named one thing each had done well.

Part 3A: Self-Review of the Recording

Watching the video, I saw that I talked over my second learner during her teach-back, which cut the check short. I also held the model at an angle the camera could not see. My opening question worked well; both learners leaned in. For the full session I will count to five after each question and practice the demonstration angle.

Part 3B: Peer Coaching Feedback

The peer coaching tool asks for feedback on the opening, clarity, engagement, checking for understanding and closure. The guidelines for effective praise in the module draw on research showing that praise helps when it names a particular behavior, sounds sincere and avoids routine, global approval (Brophy, 1981). Feedback also helps most when it tells the learner what to do next (Hattie & Timperley, 2007). I applied both to my classmate's microlesson on teaching a newly diagnosed adult to use an insulin pen.

Opening. You began by asking the "patient" what worried him most about injecting, which put his concern at the center from the first minute. Suggestion: tell him how long the lesson will take, so he knows what to expect.

Clarity. Your step-by-step sequence, from attaching the needle to holding for ten seconds, was easy to follow, and you repeated the priming step twice because people skip it more than any other step. Suggestion: show the dose window closer to the camera, as it was hard to read.

Engagement. You handed the pen to him before you finished explaining, which turned listening into doing. Suggestion: when he hesitated, you took the pen back quickly; giving him a few more seconds might build his confidence.

Checking for understanding. Your teach-back question, "Show me what you do after you click," revealed that he would have released too soon, and you corrected it calmly. This was the strongest moment of the lesson.

Closure. You summarized the steps but did not ask him what he would do if he was unsure. Suggestion: end with one question that checks his plan for getting help.

Overall, your lesson showed calm, patient-centered teaching with a clear sequence. The one change that would help most is leaving more silence for the learner to act.

What this page is doingThe self-review and the peer feedback both follow the same pattern, a specific observation followed by one change, which models the effective praise and feedback the module teaches.
3

References

Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051001005

Flaherman, V. J., Gay, B., Scott, C., Avins, A., Lee, K. A., & Newman, T. B. (2012). Randomised trial comparing hand expression with breast pumping for mothers of term newborns feeding poorly. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 97(1), F18-F23. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.209213

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

NUR 671 Module 6 instructions, in plain terms

Developing the Learning Environment, Module 3, runs from Week 5 to the middle of Week 7 and covers presentation skills, giving constructive feedback and evaluating educational outcomes. Its first two outcomes describe Part 3: demonstrate teaching a brief educational session, and provide constructive feedback to others about their teaching behaviors. The module lists microlesson videos, a peer coaching tool and guidelines for effective praise among its activities, with Portfolio Parts 3A and 3B as the assignments. Choose a short segment of your unit that shows several teaching behaviors, plan it to the minute and record it with volunteers as learners. Then write feedback on classmates' recordings using the coaching tool's areas.

Inside the NUR 671 Module 6 example

The paper moves through four sections. A plan names the segment, learners, length, objectives, materials and the teaching behaviors the writer intends to show. A minute-by-minute script follows, with the actual words of the opening problem and explanation, the narrated demonstration and the teach-back check, and one research finding offered as the reason the skill matters. A short self-review reports two things that went wrong on the recording and one that worked. The peer coaching feedback takes the tool's five areas in turn, giving one specific observation and one suggestion for each, and ends with the single change that would help most. Three sources support it, including research on praise and feedback.

NUR 671 Module 6 rubric: what earns full marks

Parts 3A and 3B are graded within the portfolio's 85%, and the module outcomes suggest the Canvas rubric will look at the teaching demonstration and the quality of feedback to peers. For the microlesson, a clear structure, a strong opening, explanation in short segments, a demonstration that learners can see and a real check for understanding all count. A self-review that notices specific problems shows the reflective skill Part 4 will build on. For peer coaching, feedback earns most when it names behaviors, explains their effect and offers one realistic suggestion, following the module's guidelines for effective praise. General comments such as "great job" do little. Respectful tone and attention to every area of the tool complete the work.

NUR 671 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks

Microlessons often try to cover too much; pick one segment that fits the time. Rehearse the demonstration with the camera in place, since a skill the viewer cannot see does not count. Teach-back is easy to rush, so wait for the full answer. In peer feedback, the usual weakness is vague praise; name what the classmate did and why it worked. Limit suggestions to one per area so the most important one stands out. If you share your unit plan, the desk can help script a microlesson from it, or help structure your coaching comments. Keep classmates' work confidential and comment on teaching behaviors, not personal style.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 671 and MS in Nursing sample papers

NUR 671 Module 6 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NUR 671 Module 6 sample paper?

The NUR 671 Portfolio Part 3 sample on this page has a microlesson plan, a minute-by-minute script, a self-review and peer coaching feedback.

What is a microlesson in NUR 671?

A brief recorded teaching session from the student's instructional unit, used to demonstrate teaching behaviors and receive peer coaching.

How do I give constructive feedback on a peer's teaching?

Name a specific behavior, explain its effect on the learner and offer one realistic suggestion, area by area on the coaching tool.

What makes praise effective?

In Brophy's analysis, praise that names the behavior and sounds sincere helps, while routine, global praise does little.

How long should a microlesson be?

Check Canvas for the required length; a few minutes is typical, so choose one segment of your unit that fits the time.