| Course | NUR 640 Integrative Theories of Innovation in Health Care |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Team presentation slides with speaker notes |
| Length | About 596 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 slide deck with speaker notes |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 640 Module 2
A Regular Clinician for Everyone: A Team Presentation on a Healthy People 2030 Access Objective Through the Lens of Complexity
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
NUR 640: Integrative Theories of Innovation in Health Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Slide 1: A Regular Clinician for Everyone
Team title slide: a Healthy People 2030 objective on usual primary care.
Speaker notes: Our team chose this objective because each of us works with patients who use the emergency department as their only source of care.
Slide 2: The Objective
Increase the proportion of people who have a usual primary care provider, under the Healthy People 2030 goal of increasing access to comprehensive, high-quality health care services.
Slide 3: Why It Matters
People with a regular source of primary care are more likely to receive preventive services and to have chronic conditions managed. Across 2002 to 2015, the share of U.S. adults reporting a usual source of primary care declined, especially among younger adults (Levine et al., 2020).
Speaker notes: The decline means the problem is getting worse even as insurance coverage expanded, which tells us coverage alone is not the answer.
Slide 4: The Problem as a Complex System
Patients, clinicians, insurers, employers, transportation and housing all interact; none controls the outcome. Small changes, such as a clinic closing its evening hours, ripple through the system.
Speaker notes: In complexity terms, the shortage of usual primary care is an emergent outcome of many local decisions, not a single failure, so a single fix will not solve it (Plsek & Greenhalgh, 2001).
Slide 5: Three Features of Complexity Here
Nonlinearity: a small copay change can push some patients out entirely. Feedback loops: patients without a provider use emergency care, which strains the system that could support primary care. Adaptation: patients and clinics change behavior in response to each other.
Slide 6: Solution 1, Community Health Workers
Trained community members link patients to a primary care home, help with appointments and address social needs.
Speaker notes: In a randomized trial at three Philadelphia primary care sites, community health worker support did not raise self-rated physical health beyond goal setting alone, but its patients gave their care top marks more often and logged about two-thirds fewer hospital days, with fewer readmissions (Kangovi et al., 2018).
Slide 7: Critique of Solution 1
Creativity: shifts work to trusted community members. Complexity fit: works through relationships and local knowledge. Evidence: a randomized trial shows fewer hospital days and better-rated care, though not better self-rated health; sustainability depends on payment.
Slide 8: Solution 2, Nurse-Led Clinics in Community Sites
Advanced practice nurse clinics in libraries, schools or shelters that enroll patients as their regular source of care.
Slide 9: Critique of Solution 2
Creativity: places primary care where people already go. Complexity fit: adapts to local context and builds trust. Evidence: promising but mostly observational; continuity and referral links must be built.
Slide 10: Solution 3, Telehealth With Follow-Up Rules
Virtual primary care visits with a rule that every new patient is assigned a named clinician and a follow-up date.
Speaker notes: Telemedicine expanded quickly during the pandemic, but rapid growth does not by itself create a continuing relationship, so the follow-up rule is the innovative piece.
Slide 11: The DNP Leader's Role
Convene partners across sectors; use data to track usual source of care; test small changes and learn quickly; advocate for payment that sustains community health workers. These draw on the DNP essentials in organizational and systems leadership, health policy and population health.
Slide 12: Summary and Questions
A system problem needs several linked solutions; relationships are the common thread; DNP leaders build the conditions that let them last.
Speaker notes: We welcome questions about which solution would fit best in your own community.
References
Kangovi, S., Mitra, N., Norton, L., Harte, R., Zhao, X., Carter, T., Grande, D., & Long, J. A. (2018). Effect of community health worker support on clinical outcomes of low-income patients across primary care facilities: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(12), 1635-1643. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630
Levine, D. M., Linder, J. A., & Landon, B. E. (2020). Characteristics of Americans with primary care and changes over time, 2002-2015. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(3), 463-466. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6282
Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ, 323(7313), 625-628. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625
NUR 640 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms
Team Assignment 1 is presented during the second synchronous call of NUR 640 and is worth 15 points. Teams choose one objective listed under the Healthy People 2030 goal to increase access to comprehensive, high-quality health care services, then cover four elements: the premise of the objective and why it matters, how complexity theory applies to it, two or three creative and innovative solutions, which may be the team's own or drawn from the literature and must be critiqued for creativity, complexity and existing evidence, and the role of the DNP leader and the DNP essentials. One team member submits the work in Canvas before the call, and the presentation itself runs 10 minutes in a format the team chooses. APA referencing is expected.
Inside the NUR 640 Module 2 example
Twelve slides carry the presentation within its 10-minute limit. The first three name the objective and give its premise with national data on declining usual primary care. Two slides apply complexity theory, describing the problem as an emergent outcome and naming nonlinearity, feedback loops and adaptation in this context. Each of three solutions then gets a description slide and a critique slide scoring it on creativity, fit with complexity and evidence, with a randomized trial supporting the first. A slide on the DNP leader links specific actions to the essentials, and the last slide ties the solutions to one principle. The notes hold the sources, leaving the slides short.
NUR 640 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
The 15 points are awarded against a rubric in Canvas. Team presentations of this kind are usually judged on a clearly stated objective and premise supported by data, a genuine application of complexity concepts to the chosen objective, solutions that are creative and critiqued on all three named criteria, a specific account of the DNP leader's role tied to the essentials, organization within the time limit and APA referencing. Teams lose credit when complexity is defined but not applied, when solutions are listed without critique, when evidence is missing for claims of effectiveness and when the DNP role is described in general leadership terms.
NUR 640 Module 2 help from the desk
The step teams most often skip is the critique. Each solution needs to be judged on creativity, on how well it fits a complex system and on the strength of its evidence, and a simple table or slide pair per solution makes that visible. Apply complexity to the objective itself, showing how the outcome emerges from many interacting parts, rather than reciting definitions. Check the exact wording of the Healthy People objective you choose. Rehearse to fit 10 minutes. Name specific DNP essentials. If your team shares its chosen objective with the desk, it can help you plan the critique slides. Assign each speaker a solution so that the critique slides are presented by the person who knows the evidence best.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 640 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- NUR 640 Module 1: Individual Assignment 1: Personal Innovation Profile and Complexity Science
- NUR 640 Module 3: Individual Assignment 2: Mind Map of Three Innovation Theories and a Working Definition
- NUR 640 Module 4: Individual Assignment 3: Innovation Model, PESTLE and Human-Centered Design for a Clinical Issue
- NUR 640 Module 5: Team Assignment 2: Theory-Based Process and Toolkit for a Persistent Health Care Problem
- DNP 708 Module 3: Map Version 2: The Problem in the National System
- DNP 714 Module 5: Team Assignment 2: Transforming a Dysfunctional Team
- DNP 645 Module 1: Case Study 1: Dermatologic Disorders (Tinea Capitis)
- DNP 661 Module 5: Final Portfolio: Ethical Practice in Action
NUR 640 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 640 Module 2 sample paper?
This page holds a full NUR 640 Module 2 sample: a twelve-slide team presentation on a Healthy People 2030 primary care access objective, with solutions critiqued through complexity.
What does NUR 640 Team Assignment 1 require?
A Healthy People 2030 access objective, its premise, how complexity theory applies, two or three critiqued solutions and the DNP leader's role, in a 10-minute presentation.
How does complexity theory apply to access to care?
Access results from interactions among patients, clinicians, payers and community conditions, so it changes in nonlinear ways and responds poorly to single fixes.
Do community health workers improve primary care outcomes?
In a randomized trial with low-income patients, community health worker support did not improve self-rated physical health more than goal setting alone, but it raised ratings of care quality and sharply cut hospital days and repeat admissions.
How much is NUR 640 Team Assignment 1 worth?
It is worth 15 points; the second team assignment at the end of the course is worth 25.