| Course | NUR 640 Integrative Theories of Innovation in Health Care |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Mind map in outline form with implementation plan |
| Length | About 513 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 640 Module 4
Falls at Night: An Innovation Model, a PESTLE Scan and Human-Centered Design for a Medical-Surgical Unit
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
NUR 640: Integrative Theories of Innovation in Health Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Falls at Night: An Innovation Model, a PESTLE Scan and Human-Centered Design for a Medical-Surgical Unit
Central Node: Reducing Falls on 5 West at Night
Over the past year, the unit's fall rate was above the hospital's target, and 70% of falls occurred between 2200 and 0600, most on the way to the bathroom.
Branch 1: Proposed Innovation Model
Greenhalgh's model of diffusion in service organizations fits because it treats spread as dependent on the innovation, the people adopting it, the unit's readiness and the outer context, and because it expects implementation to be nonlinear (Greenhalgh et al., 2004). A falls bundle that worked elsewhere will succeed here only if it fits our staff, patients and workflow.
Branch 2: Complexity Factors
Interacting agents: nurses, patient care technicians, patients, families, pharmacy and physical therapy. Nonlinearity: a small change in the timing of evening diuretics can change bathroom trips at 0200. Local adaptation: night staff already improvise, such as moving high-risk patients near the station. Unpredictability: staffing and census change nightly.
Branch 3: PESTLE Scan
| Factor | Issue | Implication | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Political | Hospital board focus on publicly reported harm | Leadership support likely | Present plan to the nursing quality council |
| Economic | No budget for new bed alarms this year | Must use existing equipment and staff time | Design around rounding and scheduling, not purchases |
| Social | Older patients do not want to "bother" nurses at night | Patients get up alone | Make toileting offers proactive |
| Technological | Bed alarms exist but are often silenced | Alarm fatigue | Standardize alarm use for the highest-risk patients only |
| Legal | Restraint rules limit options | Cannot restrict movement | Focus on toileting and supervision |
| Environmental | Dim, cluttered rooms at night | Trip hazards | Night lighting and a clear path to the bathroom |
Branch 4: Human-Centered Design
Inspiration: I interviewed six patients who fell or nearly fell and spent two night shifts observing. Patients said they woke needing the bathroom urgently and did not want to wait for a call light response. Night staff said 0100 to 0400 was their busiest charting time.
Ideation: In a session with eight night staff we generated ideas, including scheduled toileting rounds at 2200, 0000 and 0300, moving evening diuretics earlier and placing a commode beside the bed for patients who agree.
Implementation: We will prototype the scheduled rounds on half of the unit for two weeks, collect feedback and adjust before spreading (IDEO.org, 2015).
Branch 5: Implementation Decisions
Start with scheduled toileting rounds and a pharmacy review of evening diuretic timing, both low-cost and supported by staff. Assign two night-shift champions. Report weekly fall data at huddles. Use the existing fall risk assessment rather than introducing a new tool.
Branch 6: Measures and Timeline
Outcome measure: falls per 1,000 patient days at night. Process measure: percentage of scheduled rounds completed. Balancing measure: patient-reported sleep disruption. Timeline: two-week prototype, two-week revision, three-month spread across the unit, review at six months.
Evidence Note
In a randomized trial across acute care hospitals, a fall prevention toolkit tailored to each patient lowered fall rates, supporting a tailored, patient-centered approach rather than a single intervention (Dykes et al., 2010).
References
Dykes, P. C., Carroll, D. L., Hurley, A., Lipsitz, S., Benoit, A., Chang, F., Meltzer, S., Tsurikova, R., Zuyov, L., & Middleton, B. (2010). Fall prevention in acute care hospitals: A randomized trial. JAMA, 304(17), 1912-1918. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1567
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
IDEO.org. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design. IDEO.org.
Reading the NUR 640 Module 4 assignment instructions
Module 3 of NUR 640 moves from theory to application, and Individual Assignment 3 follows the same draft, peer critique and final sequence as Assignment 2, for 10 points plus peer review points. The syllabus asks you to select a clinical issue being addressed in your organization, propose an innovation model to support addressing it, identify the complexity factors affecting the innovation process and design a comprehensive plan to advance the initiative. Two tools are required: the PESTLE scan, to list political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental issues and their implications, and IDEO's human-centered design, to brainstorm with the people affected. The assignment is built in mind mapping software, with APA referencing.
Inside the NUR 640 Module 4 example
The sample presents the mind map as an outline with a central node stating the clinical issue and its data. One branch names the innovation model and explains why it fits the unit, and another lists the complexity factors in concrete terms. The PESTLE branch is a table in which each of six factors has an issue, an implication and a decision. The human-centered design branch follows IDEO's three phases, describing interviews and observation, an ideation session with night staff and a planned prototype. Implementation decisions, measures with outcome, process and balancing types and a timeline complete the plan, and a closing note cites a randomized trial of a tailored fall prevention approach.
NUR 640 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks
The rubric for Assignment 3 is in Canvas. Plans of this kind are usually credited for a real clinical issue described with data, an innovation model that fits the issue and is justified, complexity factors that are specific to the setting, a PESTLE analysis that goes from issues to implications to decisions, a human-centered design process that involves the people affected, implementation choices that follow from the analysis and measures that could show success. Credit is lost when the PESTLE becomes a list of factors without decisions, when human-centered design is named but no users are consulted and when the plan does not say what will happen first. The peer critique counts separately, so a draft that is near complete earns better feedback.
NUR 640 Module 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
The PESTLE is the part most often left unfinished; carry every factor through to a decision. In the human-centered design phases, describe the people you would actually talk to and what you would ask them. Choose a model that suits the scale of the issue. Make complexity factors concrete to your unit rather than generic. Include a balancing measure so you would notice harm from the change. Start with something small that can be tested in weeks. The desk can look at your draft map if you want a check on the link from analysis to decisions. Name your champions and say how much time they will need.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 640 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- NUR 640 Module 1: Individual Assignment 1: Personal Innovation Profile and Complexity Science
- NUR 640 Module 2: Team Assignment 1: Healthy People 2030 Access Objective and Complexity
- NUR 640 Module 3: Individual Assignment 2: Mind Map of Three Innovation Theories and a Working Definition
- NUR 640 Module 5: Team Assignment 2: Theory-Based Process and Toolkit for a Persistent Health Care Problem
- DNP 715 Module 1: Emerging Technology and AI Discussion
- DNP 647 Module 1: Case Study 1: Respiratory Disorders (Poorly Controlled Asthma)
- DNP 703 Module 4: Synthesis Essay
- DNP 643 Module 1: Case Study 1: Care of the Newborn (Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip)
NUR 640 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 640 Module 4 sample paper?
This page carries a full NUR 640 Module 4 sample: a mind map in outline form on reducing night-time falls, with an innovation model, a PESTLE scan and human-centered design.
What is a PESTLE analysis?
An environmental scan named for its six lenses (political, economic, social, technological, legal, environmental) that teams use to surface issues around a change and what follows from each.
What are the phases of IDEO's human-centered design?
Inspiration, in which you learn from the people affected; ideation, in which you generate and test ideas; and implementation, in which you bring a solution to life.
What does NUR 640 Individual Assignment 3 require?
A clinical issue from your organization, an innovation model, complexity factors and a plan built with a PESTLE scan and human-centered design, as a mind map.
What is a balancing measure in quality improvement?
A counter-check on unintended harm, here whether night toileting rounds disturb patients' sleep.