| Course | NUR 593 Applied Project |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Intervention proposal and evaluation plan |
| Length | About 757 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | MS in Nursing |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 593 Module 4
Making the Standard Visible: A Safe Sleep Intervention and Evaluation Plan for a Mother-Baby Unit
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
NUR 593: Applied Project
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Making the Standard Visible: A Safe Sleep Intervention and Evaluation Plan for a Mother-Baby Unit
Statement of the Intervention
The project will implement a safe sleep bundle on a 28-bed mother-baby unit over 12 weeks. The bundle has four parts, drawn from the synthesis of evidence (Sleutel et al., 2018; Shadman et al., 2016):
1. A 20-minute online education module for all registered nurses and nursing assistants, based on the 2022 AAP recommendations (Moon et al., 2022), with three short case scenarios such as a mother falling asleep while feeding.
2. Crib cards on every bassinet and bilingual room signs that show the three ABC rules of safe sleep.
3. A standard parent teaching script in English and Spanish, delivered by the nurse on the first day and at discharge.
4. Weekly crib audits of all sleeping infants on two random shifts, with results posted on a unit board and discussed at huddles.
Project Format and Primary Setting
The project uses a quality improvement format with a pre and post design and run charts. The setting is a 28-bed mother-baby unit in a Phoenix-area hospital with about 3,200 births a year, staffed by about 60 registered nurses and 12 nursing assistants. About 40% of families speak Spanish at home.
Statement of Change
The change is a shift from safe sleep as a discharge teaching topic to safe sleep as a visible, measured standard of care modeled throughout the stay. Currently, safe sleep is covered in the discharge packet, but no one measures what infants' sleep environments look like on the unit.
Scope of Professional Activities
As the unit educator, I am responsible for developing and delivering the education module, writing the teaching script with the hospital's interpreter services, coordinating crib card printing, training two staff nurse champions to conduct audits and reporting results to the unit's practice council. The nurse manager approves the project and protects education time; the practice council endorses the standard; and the quality department provides the audit form format and reviews the project to confirm it is quality improvement rather than research.
Evaluation Plan
Evaluation Questions
1. Does the weekly share of infants found sleeping safely rise during the 12 weeks?
2. Does nurse knowledge of the 2022 AAP recommendations improve after the education module?
3. Do parents recall receiving safe sleep teaching at discharge?
Measures, Data and Methods
| Evaluation question | Indicator | Instrument | Data source and method | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Percentage of sleeping infants meeting all safe sleep elements | Crib audit tool with six elements | Direct observation by trained champions, two random shifts weekly | Two weeks baseline, then weekly for 12 weeks |
| 2 | Mean knowledge score | 10-item test based on AAP recommendations | Online test before and after the module | Weeks 1 and 4 |
| 3 | Percentage of parents who recall three key messages | Three-question discharge survey in English or Spanish | Nurse-administered at discharge for a convenience sample of 30 families | Weeks 10 to 12 |
Ethical Use of Data
Audits record no names or medical record numbers; each observation is coded by date, shift and bassinet number. Knowledge test results are reported only as unit averages. Parent participation in the discharge survey is voluntary and anonymous. The quality department will confirm that the project meets the organization's criteria for quality improvement, and audit data will be stored on the secure unit drive and deleted after the final report.
Data Analysis, Threshold for Success and Interpretation
Each week's audit result goes on a run chart beside the median of the baseline weeks, and the run chart rules will be used to detect a shift or trend. Knowledge scores will be compared with a paired t test. Parent recall will be reported as a percentage. The threshold for success is that at least 80% of sleeping infants are observed in a fully safe environment for four consecutive weeks by the end of the project, up from the baseline of 30%. If the threshold is met, the bundle will be adopted as the unit standard; if not, audit results will be reviewed with nurses to identify which elements remain difficult, such as infants asleep in the parent's bed, and the bundle will be adjusted in another cycle.
Anticipated Barriers
Barriers include short staffing that limits time for audits, nurse discomfort in correcting tired parents, and families' cultural preferences for bed sharing. The education module includes scripts for respectful conversations, and the project will track the bed sharing element separately to understand it better. Staff turnover is another risk, so new hires will complete the module during their first week.
References
Moon, R. Y., Carlin, R. F., Hand, I., & Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn. (2022). Sleep-related infant deaths: Updated 2022 recommendations for reducing infant deaths in the sleep environment. Pediatrics, 150(1), e2022057990. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057990
Shadman, K. A., Wald, E. R., Smith, W., & Coller, R. J. (2016). Improving safe sleep practices for hospitalized infants. Pediatrics, 138(3), e20154441. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4441
Sleutel, M. R., True, B., Gustus, H., Baldwin, K., & Early, B. (2018). Response to a national issue: Moving beyond "Back to Sleep" at three hospitals. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 43, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.07.013
What the NUR 593 Module 4 instructions ask for
The published syllabus places Assignment 4, Intervention, Innovation and Evaluation Plan, in Weeks 8 and 9, drawing on Course Modules 4 through 6: the statement of intervention or innovation, project format and primary setting; the statement of change and scope of professional activities; and planning for evaluation, including evaluation questions, data type, method, source and ethical use, measurement indicators, instruments and timeline, and data analysis, threshold for success and interpretation. Transforming Inquiry to Practice is worth 20 of 100 points. Expect headings that mirror those module topics. Because this assignment combines several modules, many students draft each section as the module is completed and assemble them at the end of Week 9. Faculty comments on the synthesis are worth addressing before you finalize the intervention.
How this NUR 593 Module 4 example is built
Headings follow the syllabus topics in order, so a grader can find each required element. The intervention is described as four concrete components tied to the evidence synthesis. Format, setting, change and scope sections are short and specific, naming who does what. The evaluation plan begins with three questions and uses a table to link each question to an indicator, instrument, data source and timeline. Ethical use of data, the analysis plan and a numeric threshold for success follow, along with what will happen if the threshold is or is not met. A short section on anticipated barriers closes the paper, which makes the plan feel workable for a busy unit.
Where the marks sit in the NUR 593 Module 4 rubric
Intervention and evaluation plans are commonly graded on alignment between the evidence and the intervention, clarity and feasibility of the change, a well-defined scope of professional activities, evaluation questions matched to measurable indicators and instruments, ethical handling of data, an appropriate analysis plan, and a stated threshold for success. Faculty look for alignment across the plan: each question should have a measure, a data source and an analysis. A threshold with a number and time frame shows the student knows how success will be judged. Attention to barriers adds realism. When a plan says who gathers each measure, how often and how data are protected, it tend to score higher on feasibility and ethics.
NUR 593 Module 4 help from the desk
The most common weakness is an evaluation plan with no threshold for success or with measures that do not match the questions. Build a table that links each question to its indicator, tool and timeline. Another is describing an intervention larger than the student's role allows; state your scope honestly. Address ethics even for quality improvement. Keep the intervention tied to your synthesis. If you want help aligning your intervention with an evaluation plan, send your synthesis and draft to the desk. Pilot your audit tool or survey on a few cases before finalizing it, and mention any changes you made, which shows the instrument fits your setting.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 593 and MS in Nursing sample papers
- NUR 593 Module 1: Project Topic and Answerable Question
- NUR 593 Module 2: Evidence Review and Evaluation Table
- NUR 593 Module 3: Synthesis Table and Integrative Summary
- NUR 593 Module 5: Applied Project Abstract
- NUR 593 Module 6: Applied Project PowerPoint Presentation
- NUR 593 Module 7: Significant Learning Self-Reflection
- NUR 552 Module 1: Critical Reflection Discussion Board: Interprofessional Competency Self-Assessment
- NUR 670 Module 7: End-Course Learning Synthesis (Course Exit Reflection)
- NUR 610 Module 6: Final Presentation Topic Outline
- NUR 672 Module 1: Learning Plan Part 1: The Analyze Phase of ADDIE
NUR 593 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 593 Module 4 sample paper?
The intervention and evaluation plan is above in full: a four-part safe sleep bundle, format, setting, change and scope, evaluation questions, a measures table, ethical use of data, analysis and a threshold for success.
What goes in the NUR 593 evaluation plan?
Evaluation questions, indicators, instruments, data sources and methods, ethical use of data, timeline, analysis, a threshold for success and interpretation.
What is a threshold for success in NUR 593?
A specific, measurable result that will show the project worked, such as 80% compliance for four consecutive weeks.
Does a NUR 593 quality improvement project need ethical review?
Follow your organization's process; many ask a review office to confirm that a project counts as quality improvement, not research, and data should be protected.
How many points is Transforming Inquiry to Practice?
The syllabus lists it at 20 of 100 points.