| Course | IBC 793 Applied Project |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 11 |
| Paper type | Project budget |
| Length | About 389 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Behavioral Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for IBC 793 Module 11
What It Will Take: A Proposed Budget for the Closing the Loop Project
Student Name
Doctor of Behavioral Health, Arizona State University
IBC 793: Applied Project
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
What It Will Take: A Proposed Budget for the Closing the Loop Project
Budget Assumptions
The budget covers nine months: two months of preparation, six months of implementation and one month to embed and report. Existing behavioral health consultant time is funded through the clinic's integrated care program and is listed as in-kind. All amounts are hypothetical estimates for planning.
Proposed Budget
| Line item | Calculation | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Bilingual care coordinator, 0.5 FTE | 7 months at $3,200 a month including benefits | $22,400 |
| Child psychiatrist consultation | 2 hours a month for 6 months at $250 an hour | $3,000 |
| Registry report build and testing | 40 analyst hours at $85 an hour | $3,400 |
| Staff training on handoff script and workflow | Two one-hour sessions for 25 staff, at an average of $45 an hour | $2,250 |
| Spanish-language outreach scripts and family handouts | Translation and printing | $1,200 |
| Transportation help for families | Ride vouchers, about 60 rides at $25 | $1,500 |
| Total direct costs | | $33,750 |
In-Kind Contributions
The clinic contributes behavioral health consultant time, about 0.2 FTE for handoffs and brief visits, the medical director's oversight, clinic space and the existing electronic health record. The DBH student's time is contributed as part of the applied project.
Justification and Value
The coordinator is the largest cost because outreach is the component that addresses the main root cause, the absence of anyone responsible for follow-up. Psychiatric consultation supports treat-to-target care for adolescents who do not improve, the approach tested in the adolescent collaborative care trial (Richardson et al., 2014). The registry build is a one-time cost that supports sustainability.
For comparison, the economic study attached to the adolescent collaborative care trial put added delivery costs near $1,475 per teen and judged the program good value for the health it bought (Wright et al., 2016). If the project engages an additional 30 adolescents over six months, the direct cost of about $1,125 per added adolescent is in a similar range.
Sustainability
After the project, the coordinator role could be funded through Arizona Medicaid care coordination payments or folded into an existing position, and the registry will continue at no added cost, supporting further improvement cycles after the project ends (Langley et al., 2009).
Conclusion
The project can be implemented for about $33,750 in direct costs, with most expenses tied to the outreach role that addresses the main cause of lost follow-up.
References
Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Richardson, L. P., Ludman, E., McCauley, E., Lindenbaum, J., Larison, C., Zhou, C., Clarke, G., Brent, D., & Katon, W. (2014). Collaborative care for adolescents with depression in primary care: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 312(8), 809-816. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.9259
Wright, D. R., Haaland, W. L., Ludman, E., McCauley, E., Lindenbaum, J., & Richardson, L. P. (2016). The costs and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for adolescents with depression in primary care settings: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(11), 1048-1054. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1721
Reading the IBC 793 Module 11 assignment instructions
Module 11 closes the planning sequence with a 10-point Proposed Budget. Estimate the cost of implementing your applied project, listing each expense with its calculation and a short justification. Separate direct costs from in-kind contributions your organization already provides, and state your assumptions about the project period and staffing. Where possible, connect costs to the components of your intervention and to the root causes they address, and consider how the work could be sustained after the project ends. Label estimates as hypothetical if you do not have actual quotes or salary data. Include a short note on how the budget could be sustained. Show every calculation, list in-kind contributions separately and keep the project period consistent with your Module 6 timeline.
How this IBC 793 Module 11 example is built
The sample states the budget period and assumptions before presenting a table in which every line shows its calculation. In-kind contributions are listed separately so the true resource picture is clear. The justification section ties the largest cost to the root cause identified in Module 8 and compares the per-adolescent cost with a published economic analysis. A short sustainability section names realistic funding options. Margin notes explain why showing calculations matters. All figures are labeled as hypothetical planning estimates. Comparing the cost per added adolescent with published data helps leaders judge whether the spending is reasonable. In-kind support is shown separately so the true cost of the project is visible to decision makers.
Where the marks sit in the IBC 793 Module 11 rubric
Faculty reviewing the budget look for complete, realistic costs with clear calculations, a justification linking expenses to the intervention, separation of direct and in-kind resources and attention to sustainability. Budgets lose points when lines appear without calculations, when major costs such as staff time are omitted, when amounts are unrealistic or when the budget does not match the intervention described earlier. Comparing costs with published evidence, or with the value of expected improvements, strengthens the case for implementation. Budgets that match the intervention described in earlier modules line by line show strong internal consistency. A brief sustainability plan strengthens any budget.
IBC 793 Module 11 help with common mistakes
List every resource your intervention needs, including people, time, technology and materials. Show how you calculated each cost. Separate what you need to buy from what your organization already provides. Tie the biggest costs to the most important components. Compare your cost per patient with any published data. Note how the work could continue after the project. If you lack salary data, the desk can help you find reasonable estimates. Check that the total matches the sum of the lines. Ask your finance office for the benefit rate they use, since it changes staff costs considerably. Round figures sensibly and state that they are estimates. Add the lines again by hand to confirm the total.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More IBC 793 and Doctor of Behavioral Health sample papers
- IBC 793 Module 2: SBAR Assignment: Closing the Loop on Positive Adolescent Depression Screens
- IBC 793 Module 3: PICOT Assignment: Building the Applied Project's Clinical Question
- IBC 793 Module 4: PICOT Population Paper: Adolescents With Positive Depression Screens in a Pediatric Clinic
- IBC 793 Module 5: Table Technique: An Evidence Table for the Project's Intervention
- IBC 793 Module 6: Intervention Steps and Timeline: Planning Six Months of Implementation
- IBC 793 Module 7: Evidenced Based Intervention Paper: Warm Handoffs With Registry-Based Follow-Up
- IBC 793 Module 8: PICOT Current Status and Root Cause Analysis Paper: Why Follow-Up Fails
- IBC 793 Module 9: PICOT Identified Outcomes Paper: Outcome, Process and Balancing Measures
- IBC 793 Module 10: Measurement Tool Paper: The PHQ-9 for Adolescents and the Project Registry
- IBC 603 Module 6: Population Health Management Planning Paper: Depression in Adults With Diabetes
IBC 793 Module 11 questions, answered
Where can I find a free IBC 793 Module 11 sample paper?
The full nine-month budget with calculations is on this page.
What does the IBC 793 budget include?
Each expense with its calculation and justification, plus in-kind contributions.
What is an in-kind contribution?
A resource an organization already provides, such as staff time or space, that is not a new cost.
How much did adolescent collaborative care cost in one trial?
About $1,475 per adolescent in added delivery costs.
Why show calculations in a budget?
So reviewers can check the math and adjust the assumptions.