| Course | IBC 793 Applied Project |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 10 |
| Paper type | Measurement tool paper |
| Length | About 430 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Behavioral Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for IBC 793 Module 10
Measuring What Matters: The Tools Behind the Closing the Loop Project
Student Name
Doctor of Behavioral Health, Arizona State University
IBC 793: Applied Project
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Measuring What Matters: The Tools Behind the Closing the Loop Project
Clinical Tool: The PHQ-9 for Adolescents
The project uses the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire with wording adapted for adolescents, which asks about depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Validated against a structured diagnostic interview in teens seen in primary care, the cut point of 11 caught about nine in ten cases of major depression while correctly clearing roughly three in four teens without it, and higher scores tracked with greater impairment (Richardson et al., 2010). The tool is brief, free to use and available in English and Spanish, which suits a busy pediatric clinic. Any positive answer on the self-harm question triggers the clinic's safety protocol regardless of the total score.
The PHQ-9 serves two purposes in the project: identifying the population at screening and measuring response, defined as a 50% drop in score within 8 to 12 weeks.
Data System: The Registry
A registry report in the electronic health record lists every adolescent with a positive screen, the date, the score, the language preference, whether a same-day handoff occurred, the date of any follow-up and repeat scores. The care coordinator updates outreach attempts in a coded field that the report can tally. The data analyst runs the report weekly for the care team and monthly for the improvement team.
Data Collection Workflow
| Step | Who | When |
|---|---|---|
| Adolescent completes PHQ-9 on a tablet, privately | Adolescent, with medical assistant support | Well visit check-in |
| Score entered and flagged if 11 or more | Medical assistant | Before the provider enters |
| Handoff and visit documented in structured fields | Behavioral health consultant | Same day |
| Outreach attempts logged | Care coordinator | Within seven days |
| Repeat PHQ-9 at follow-up visits | Behavioral health consultant | Each visit |
Data Quality and Confidentiality
Each month the analyst will review ten random records against the registry to check accuracy, and the team will document any changes to definitions, as quality improvement reporting standards recommend (Ogrinc et al., 2016). Adolescents complete the questionnaire privately, and results are discussed with them before parents, consistent with the clinic's confidentiality policy. Registry access is limited to the care team.
Displaying Results
Each month's figure goes on a run chart, a time-ordered plot with a median line that lets the team to see whether changes lead to improvement rather than random variation (Provost & Murray, 2011). Separate lines will show results for Spanish- and English-preferring families.
Conclusion
A validated, practical screening tool, a structured registry and simple run charts give the project reliable data with little added burden, making it possible to judge the intervention month by month.
References
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 31(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000153
Provost, L. P., & Murray, S. K. (2011). The health care data guide: Learning from data for improvement. Jossey-Bass.
Richardson, L. P., McCauley, E., Grossman, D. C., McCarty, C. A., Richards, J., Russo, J. E., Rockhill, C., & Katon, W. (2010). Evaluation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics, 126(6), 1117-1123. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0852
What the IBC 793 Module 10 instructions ask for
The Module 10 Measurement Tool Paper is another 10-point step toward the final proposal. Describe the instruments and data systems you will use to measure the outcomes you defined in Module 9. For any clinical tool, explain what it measures, its validity and reliability for your population and how it will be administered. For data systems, explain what will be recorded, by whom and when, how you will check data quality and how results will be displayed. Address language, literacy and confidentiality as they apply. The measurement plan becomes part of your evaluation section in the Module 12 proposal folder. Reuse the outcome table from Module 9 as a checklist. Address privacy for every sensitive measure, and explain how often each data source will be updated.
How the IBC 793 Module 10 example is put together
The paper begins with the clinical tool, reporting its validation results among adolescents and explaining its two roles in the project. A section on the registry lists the data elements and who maintains them. A workflow table shows each data collection step with its owner and timing. Data quality checks and confidentiality protections follow, and a final section explains how run charts will display results by language group. The approach is consistent with quality improvement reporting standards (Ogrinc et al., 2016). Margin notes explain how the tool links population and outcome. The workflow table assigns every data point to a person and a moment in the visit.
IBC 793 Module 10 rubric: what earns full marks
Faculty grading the measurement paper look for tools that fit the outcomes, evidence of validity for the population, a realistic data collection workflow, attention to data quality and a clear plan for displaying results over time. Papers lose points when tools are named without validation evidence, when data collection depends on unclear manual steps, when confidentiality is overlooked for sensitive measures or when results would be reported only before and after rather than over time. Linking each tool to a defined outcome shows alignment across the proposal. Plans that show how data will be checked for accuracy, not just collected, are judged more trustworthy.
IBC 793 Module 10 help from the desk
List each outcome from your outcomes paper and the tool or data source for it. Find validation data for any clinical instrument in your population. Describe exactly who records each data point and when. Plan a simple monthly accuracy check. Consider confidentiality, especially with adolescents. Choose a display, such as a run chart, that shows change over time. If data systems feel unfamiliar, the desk can help you outline the workflow. Keep added staff burden as small as possible. Ask your organization's data analyst what reports already exist before designing new ones. A run chart template can be set up before launch. Pilot the workflow with two or three records before launch.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More IBC 793 and Doctor of Behavioral Health sample papers
- IBC 793 Module 2: SBAR Assignment: Closing the Loop on Positive Adolescent Depression Screens
- IBC 793 Module 3: PICOT Assignment: Building the Applied Project's Clinical Question
- IBC 793 Module 4: PICOT Population Paper: Adolescents With Positive Depression Screens in a Pediatric Clinic
- IBC 793 Module 5: Table Technique: An Evidence Table for the Project's Intervention
- IBC 793 Module 6: Intervention Steps and Timeline: Planning Six Months of Implementation
- IBC 793 Module 7: Evidenced Based Intervention Paper: Warm Handoffs With Registry-Based Follow-Up
- IBC 793 Module 8: PICOT Current Status and Root Cause Analysis Paper: Why Follow-Up Fails
- IBC 793 Module 9: PICOT Identified Outcomes Paper: Outcome, Process and Balancing Measures
- IBC 793 Module 11: Proposed Budget: The Costs of Closing the Loop
- IBC 603 Module 6: Population Health Management Planning Paper: Depression in Adults With Diabetes
IBC 793 Module 10 questions, answered
Where can I find a free IBC 793 Module 10 sample paper?
This page has the full write-up of the PHQ-9, the registry and the run charts.
What does the IBC 793 measurement paper describe?
The tools and data systems used to measure the project's outcomes.
How accurate is the PHQ-9 in adolescents?
A score of 11 or more had 89.5% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity in one validation study.
What is a run chart?
A graph of data over time with a median line, used to see whether changes lead to improvement.
Why check registry data against records?
To confirm the data used to judge the project are accurate.