| Course | HCR 406 Health Literacy for Health Care Professionals |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Health communication campaign final paper |
| Length | About 766 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BS in Health Care Coordination |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCR 406 Module 4
Know Your Plan: A Peer-Led Health Insurance Literacy Campaign for ASU Students
Student Name
BS in Health Care Coordination, Arizona State University
HCR 406: Health Literacy for Health Care Professionals
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Know Your Plan: A Peer-Led Health Insurance Literacy Campaign for ASU Students
Introduction
For students handling coverage on their own for the first time, the challenge is a practical literacy task: understanding the words that decide what care costs and where they can get it. Know Your Plan is a semester-long campaign that teaches ASU students four core insurance terms and helps them find that information on their own plan before they need care.
Background and Rationale for the Target Segment
Confusion about coverage is not limited to students. In national surveys of adults with private coverage, most respondents could not correctly answer basic questions about the features of their plans, and they understood a simplified plan better than a traditional one with deductibles and coinsurance (Loewenstein et al., 2013). Beyond insurance, low health literacy in general goes along with greater use of emergency care, fewer preventive services and poorer medication use (Berkman et al., 2011). Coverage itself improves access and financial protection (Sommers et al., 2017), but only when people know how to use it. First- and second-year students were chosen because many are managing coverage for the first time, live in residence halls where peer outreach is practical and have not yet formed habits for seeking care. Formative research added international students, who often hold university plans with unfamiliar rules.
Conceptual Framework
In Health Belief Model terms, a student is most likely to learn a plan when a costly surprise feels both possible and serious, when learning looks easier than it is worth, when something triggers the effort and when the student trusts their own ability (Janz & Becker, 1984). In our pre-campaign survey, students rated their risk of an unexpected medical bill as low and the effort to learn their plan as high, and fewer than a third felt confident reading their plan summary. The campaign therefore raises perceived susceptibility with common scenarios, lowers barriers with a five-minute format and builds self-efficacy through guided practice with each student's own card.
The Campaign Message
The core message pairs the campaign name with a cue, the moment before care is needed, so the call to action and its timing arrive together. The supporting message, "Four words: deductible, copay, coinsurance, network," narrows the task to something manageable. In testing with 20 students, this version was preferred over a longer message listing plan features, because it sounded achievable.
Strategic Approach and Formative Evaluation
The central strategy is tailored, interactive peer education at plan check stations, supported by mass media and print. Tailoring was chosen because tailored print interventions produce small but reliable improvements in health behavior over generic materials (Noar et al., 2007), and in-person guidance allows tailoring to each student's plan type.
A pilot station in one residence hall served 48 students over two evenings. Strengths: students engaged when they worked with their own card, and post-check quiz scores were high. Limitations: some students did not carry their card or know their plan's app, which slowed checks; peer educators needed more training on Medicaid and international plans; and the format reached students already near the station rather than commuters. The campaign responded by adding a "find your card" step to the video, a one-page reference sheet for educators and a pop-up station in the student union.
Communication Channels and Supporting Evidence
| Channel | Purpose | Supporting rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Peer-led plan check stations | Tailored practice and self-efficacy | Tailoring improves behavior change modestly (Noar et al., 2007) |
| Short social media videos | Reach and cues to action | Students' primary information channel in formative focus groups |
| Wallet guide | Reference at the point of care | Plain-language print supports limited health literacy (Berkman et al., 2011) |
| Student health web page | Plan-finder checklist and clinic links | Single trusted source for follow-up |
Campaign Objectives
1. Reach: 1,000 students complete a plan check by the end of fall semester.
2. Knowledge: at least 70 percent of participants define all four terms correctly after a check.
3. Behavior: at a spring follow-up, six in ten participants can say whether the clinic they use is covered in network.
4. Process: 12 station events, 4 videos posted and 2,000 wallet guides distributed.
Conclusions
Know Your Plan addresses a health literacy gap that is common, consequential and fixable. Grounding the campaign in the Health Belief Model and in evidence on tailored communication led to a short, practical message and a hands-on strategy, and formative testing showed both its promise and its limits. If objectives are met, students will be better prepared to seek appropriate care without surprise costs, and the model could extend to other campuses or to newly insured community members.
References
Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101
Loewenstein, G., Friedman, J. Y., McGill, B., Ahmad, S., Linck, S., Sinkula, S., Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Kolstad, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., List, J. A., & Volpp, K. G. (2013). Consumers' misunderstanding of health insurance. Journal of Health Economics, 32(5), 850-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.004
Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673-693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
Sommers, B. D., Gawande, A. A., & Baicker, K. (2017). Health insurance coverage and health: What the recent evidence tells us. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(6), 586-593. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1706645
What the HCR 406 Module 4 instructions ask for
The Final Paper is the largest single assignment in HCR 406, worth 80 of the course's 400 points, and the syllabus states that no late submissions are allowed. It must be typed in APA format, 3 to 5 pages excluding references, and include an introduction with an overview of the health topic and the rationale for the targeted population segment, the conceptual framework guiding the message, the purpose of the message, the strategic approach with its strengths and limitations based on a formative campaign evaluation, communication channels with supporting evidence, campaign objectives and conclusions. Use the headings the syllabus lists, so the grader can find each part, and draw on everything built during the term. A short appendix with your materials can help the reader, if your instructor allows it.
How the HCR 406 Module 4 example is put together
Each heading in the sample mirrors an element from the syllabus. The background pairs national evidence with the reason the student segment was chosen, and the framework section reports pre-campaign survey results showing which beliefs matter for this audience. The message section reports what testing with twenty students revealed, and the strategy section describes a pilot station's strengths and weaknesses and the changes they prompted. A table matches each channel to its purpose and rationale, four objectives cover reach, knowledge, behavior and process and the conclusion states what the campaign could achieve and where it might spread. Each section is short, leaving space within the page limit for evidence.
HCR 406 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks
Eighty points ride on the final paper's Canvas rubric. Credit typically goes to papers that include every required section, justify the target segment, apply the framework in a way that shapes the message, report strengths and limitations from real formative evaluation, support each channel with evidence or audience research, state measurable objectives, conclude concisely and follow APA format within the page range. Points are lost for formative evaluation that is only imagined, for channels without supporting evidence, for vague objectives and for papers that run well over or under the required length. A final read for consistency between objectives, channels and materials is worth the time.
HCR 406 Module 4 help with common mistakes
Turn the syllabus list into your headings so each required part is easy to find. Report actual formative findings, even modest ones from message testing or a small pilot, rather than describing what you would test. Give every channel a reason grounded in evidence or audience research. Make sure objectives match those in your outline. Use a table where it saves space without losing meaning. Because late papers are not accepted, plan to finish a day early and proofread. If you would like a second opinion, the desk can check your draft against the required sections. Proofread tables carefully as well.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HCR 406 and BS in Health Care Coordination sample papers
- HCR 406 Module 1: Health Communication Campaign Short Paper
- HCR 406 Module 2: Health Communication Campaign Outline
- HCR 406 Module 3: Campaign Material
- HCR 420 Module 1: Leadership vs. Management Paper
- HCR 210 Module 1: Values and Ethical Thinking in Healthcare
- HCR 230 Module 3: Health Equity Campaign, Section 3: Audience-Specific Materials
- HCR 302 Module 1: Transformation Paper: Critiquing the HHS Disparities Action Plan
HCR 406 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HCR 406 Module 4 sample paper?
A full HCR 406 Module 4 sample is on this page: the final paper for a peer-led health insurance literacy campaign.
How long is the HCR 406 final paper?
Three to five pages in APA format, excluding references.
Can the HCR 406 final paper be late?
No. The syllabus states that no late submissions are allowed.
What is a formative campaign evaluation?
Testing done before or early in a campaign, such as message testing or a pilot, to learn what works and improve it.
How much is the HCR 406 final paper worth?
It is worth 80 of the course's 400 points.