| Course | DNP 709 Individual and Innovation Leadership in Healthcare Practice |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 9 |
| Paper type | Team presentation slides and speaker notes |
| Length | About 473 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 709 Module 9
Bringing the Hospital Home: A Case for a Nurse-Led Hospital-at-Home Program
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 709: Individual and Innovation Leadership in Healthcare Practice
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Bringing the Hospital Home: A Case for a Nurse-Led Hospital-at-Home Program
Slides and Speaker Notes
| Slide | Title | Speaker notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bringing the Hospital Home | Introduce the team by role. One sentence: we propose treating selected acutely ill adults at home with hospital-level care. |
| 2 | The Problem | Admitted patients board for hours in our emergency department, and frail older adults lose strength during every hospital day. Use the system's own boarding hours from last winter. |
| 3 | The Evidence | Randomization in Boston showed lower direct cost at home, with fewer labs and scans, more daily movement and fewer 30-day readmissions than in the hospital arm (Levine et al., 2020). |
| 4 | The Model | Patients who qualify, for example with a heart failure flare, cellulitis or pneumonia, go from the emergency department to home, with two nurse visits a day, continuous remote monitoring, daily physician visits by video or in person, and a 24-hour command center. |
| 5 | The Nurse's Role | A registered nurse leads in-home care, assessments, medication administration and teaching; a nurse in the command center watches monitoring data. Show a day in the life. |
| 6 | Why It Fits Here | Apply the innovation attributes: relative advantage, compatibility with home health services, trialability with three diagnoses, observability through a dashboard (Greenhalgh et al., 2004). |
| 7 | How We Will Lead the Change | Kotter's steps for action: urgency from boarding data, a guiding coalition across nursing, hospital medicine and home health, short-term wins with the first ten patients (Kotter, 2012). |
| 8 | Innovation Faces on Our Team | Experimenter runs a ten-patient pilot; Anthropologist shadows patients at home; Storyteller presents patient experiences to the board (Kelley & Littman, 2016). |
| 9 | Risks and Safeguards | Clinical deterioration at home: escalation protocol with ambulance return. Caregiver burden: screening before admission. Staff readiness: competency training and ride-alongs. |
| 10 | How We Will Measure Success | Safety: escalations and 30-day readmissions. Experience: patient and caregiver ratings. Capacity: bed-days released. Staff: nurse satisfaction with the role. |
| 11 | Cost and Sustainability | Start-up costs for monitoring equipment and staff training; savings from avoided bed-days. Present the pilot budget and break-even point. |
| 12 | Our Ask | Approve a six-month, ten-bed pilot with a nurse manager lead, with results returned to leadership at month six. |
How the Course Tools Shaped the Case
The team charter's roles decided who presented each section. The complexity module taught us to treat the pilot as an experiment with simple rules rather than a fixed plan: keep patients safe, return anyone who worsens, and report every escalation. The change theory discussion produced our pairing of the diffusion model with Kotter's action steps. The self-assessments helped us assign the opening and closing to the strongest presenters.
Delivery Plan
Twenty minutes in total: fifteen for slides and five for questions. Each member presents two or three slides. One rehearsal on Zoom with a timer and one with a faculty-style question round.
References
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2016). The ten faces of innovation: Strategies for heightening creativity. Profile Books.
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
Levine, D. M., Ouchi, K., Blanchfield, B., Saenz, A., Burke, K., Paz, M., Diamond, K., Pu, C. T., & Schnipper, J. L. (2020). Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0600
DNP 709 Module 9 instructions, in plain terms
The posted syllabus grades the Case for Innovation Presentation at 150 points, the largest grade in the course, as a team assignment in Week 15, Implementing and sustaining innovation. The final team presentation must address a healthcare challenge thoroughly, using tools and content from across the course. It builds on the team charter, the change theory comparison and the learning community collaboration in Week 14. Expect to present the problem, the innovation, evidence, a change framework, the team's roles, risks, measures and resources, and to answer questions. Canvas holds the rubric and time limit. Plan rehearsals into your team calendar early. Some faculty ask for the slide file and a recording, so confirm both formats before the presentation week.
Inside the DNP 709 Module 9 example
The presentation follows a decision maker's logic: problem, evidence, model, people, plan, risks, measures, cost and the ask. Each slide has one idea and speaker notes that tell the presenter what to say. Course tools appear where they help the argument: innovation attributes explain fit, Kotter's steps provide the action plan and Kelley's faces assign team roles. Risks are paired with safeguards. Measures cover safety, experience, capacity and staff. A section explains how course tools shaped the case, and the delivery plan shows timing and rehearsal. Speaker notes are written as prompts rather than a script, so each presenter can sound natural while still covering the same points.
Where the marks sit in the DNP 709 Module 9 rubric
Innovation presentations are generally graded on a clear healthcare challenge, a well-supported innovation, integration of course concepts, a realistic implementation and evaluation plan, attention to risks and resources, quality of slides and delivery, and balanced team participation. Faculty look for cases a leader could approve. Evidence on a slide, cited correctly, adds weight. Integrating several course tools, rather than only the last module, shows synthesis. A specific ask, such as a time-limited pilot, makes the case actionable. Smooth transitions between presenters show teamwork. Answering questions confidently also counts toward the grade. Teams that handle questions well usually rehearsed them, so practice with someone who plays a skeptical executive.
DNP 709 Module 9 help: mistakes that cost marks
Team presentations often look like five separate talks stitched together. Agree on one storyline and a shared template first. Another problem is slides crowded with text; put detail in the speaker notes. Make sure every member presents. Cite the evidence on the slide where it is used. End with a clear request. If you would like help building your team's Case for Innovation presentation, send the healthcare challenge, your team's notes and the rubric to the desk. Rehearse the transitions, not only the content, and plan who answers which kinds of questions. Assign one person to watch the clock and signal when a section runs over, and agree in advance which slide to skip if time runs short.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 709 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 709 Module 1: Immersion Reflection: Leadership Vision
- DNP 709 Module 2: Leader Reflection Mind Map
- DNP 709 Module 3: Faces of Innovation Discussion
- DNP 709 Module 4: Leader Self-Assessment Paper
- DNP 709 Module 5: Learning Community Team Charter
- DNP 709 Module 6: Immersion Reflection: Conflict Plan
- DNP 709 Module 7: Complexity and Culture of Innovation Discussion
- DNP 709 Module 8: Change Theory Comparison and Application
- DNP 709 Module 10: Innovation Leadership Synthesis Paper
- DNP 641 Module 3: Case Study: Abnormal Findings and Differential Diagnoses (Cervical Lymphadenopathy)
- DNP 679 Module 1: Post Immersion 1 Written Assignment: Descriptive Statistics on Insomnia Severity Data
- DNP 606 Module 1: Case Study 1: Status Asthmaticus
- DNP 671 Module 5: Discussion: Interviewing an Adult With Anxiety and a Child With ADHD
DNP 709 Module 9 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 709 Module 9 sample paper?
The Case for Innovation above is complete: twelve slides with speaker notes making the case for a nurse-led hospital-at-home program, plus how the course tools shaped it and a delivery plan.
How many points is the DNP 709 Case for Innovation Presentation?
At 150 points it outweighs every other assignment.
Is the DNP 709 Case for Innovation a team assignment?
Yes. It is a final team presentation delivered in Week 15.
What is hospital at home?
It treats certain acutely ill patients in their own beds instead of a ward, with daily nursing visits, home monitoring and a physician directing care.
What should the last slide of an innovation presentation say?
The specific decision you want leaders to make, such as approving a time-limited pilot.