| Course | DNP 709 Individual and Innovation Leadership in Healthcare Practice |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | Team charter |
| Length | About 443 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 709 Module 5
Learning Community 4 Team Charter: How Five DNP Students Will Build a Case for Hospital at Home
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 709: Individual and Innovation Leadership in Healthcare Practice
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Learning Community 4 Team Charter: How Five DNP Students Will Build a Case for Hospital at Home
Purpose and Deliverables
Our purpose is to build a persuasive, evidence-based case for a hospital-at-home program at a Phoenix health system, a model that lowered costs and readmissions in a randomized trial (Levine et al., 2020), delivered as our Case for Innovation presentation in Week 15. Along the way we will complete a change theory comparison together and support each member's individual assignments.
Members, Strengths and Growth Opportunities
| Member role | Strengths | Growth opportunity |
|---|---|---|
| Medical unit nurse manager | Listening, staff perspective, removing obstacles | Speaking up about pace and deadlines |
| Clinical nurse specialist | Organizing, evidence appraisal, setting direction | Letting others lead parts of the work |
| Family nurse practitioner | Storytelling, patient perspective, slides | Meeting internal deadlines |
| Emergency department charge nurse | Quick testing, flow data, energy | Documenting decisions for others |
| Nurse informaticist | Technology, remote monitoring, data visuals | Explaining technical ideas simply |
Ground Rules
1. Come prepared: read the materials and finish your piece before the meeting.
2. Camera on, phone away for the length of the call.
3. Disagree with ideas, not people; anyone can raise a concern without penalty.
4. Reply to team messages within 24 hours on weekdays.
5. Credit each other's work by name in shared documents and presentations.
Meetings
Weekly, Tuesdays at 7:00 p.m. Arizona time on Zoom, 45 minutes, with an agenda posted by Monday evening. Extra working sessions in Weeks 13 and 14. The informaticist records decisions in a shared log.
Roles
Facilitator rotates every three weeks. Timekeeper and note-taker rotate weekly. The clinical nurse specialist is the submission lead and confirms that every assignment is uploaded on time.
Decisions
Consensus comes first. When a disagreement survives one full meeting, a simple majority vote settles it. Decisions are final once recorded in the log unless new evidence appears.
Conflict
Step 1: raise it directly with the person within 48 hours. Step 2: bring it to the facilitator. Step 3: discuss at the next meeting with a set time limit. Step 4: ask faculty for guidance. We expect to pass through a storming stage, which classic group research treats as normal before a team settles into norms and performance (Tuckman, 1965).
Checking Our Health
At Week 8, alongside the course peer review, each member will rate on a 1 to 5 scale whether they feel safe raising concerns and whether work is shared fairly. Psychological safety predicts whether teams learn from mistakes (Edmondson, 1999), so a low score will trigger a discussion at the next meeting.
Signatures
All five members agreed to this charter in Week 7 and will revisit it after the peer review.
References
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Levine, D. M., Ouchi, K., Blanchfield, B., Saenz, A., Burke, K., Paz, M., Diamond, K., Pu, C. T., & Schnipper, J. L. (2020). Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0600
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
Reading the DNP 709 Module 5 assignment instructions
The posted syllabus grades the Team Charter at 40 points as a written team charter in Week 7, the lesson on creating the foundation for team effectiveness. The charter must outline ground rules, meeting dates and times, and each member's strengths and growth opportunities. A peer review survey follows in Week 8, so the rules you write become the standard teammates use to rate each other. Expect to agree on the charter as a group and submit one document. Canvas may provide a template. Draft the sections in a shared document before your first meeting, then use the meeting to agree rather than to write. Submit one document for the team, and keep the editable version where everyone can update it after the peer review.
How this DNP 709 Module 5 example is built
The charter opens with the team's purpose and deliverables, so every rule that follows serves a goal. Member strengths and growth areas sit in a table, as the syllabus requires, and members are described by role. Ground rules are short and testable, such as a 24-hour reply window. Meetings, roles, decision rules and a stepwise conflict process are spelled out. Two sources explain why the team expects early conflict and why it measures psychological safety. A midterm health check gives the charter a way to be enforced, and the closing line records agreement. Every rule is something a teammate could later point to in a peer review. Describing members by role keeps the sample anonymous, but in your own charter use names so responsibilities are clear.
DNP 709 Module 5 rubric: what earns full marks
Charters earn their points through every required element being present, specific and enforceable ground rules, a realistic meeting plan, honest strengths and growth opportunities for each member, clear roles and decision processes, a conflict plan and evidence of team agreement. Faculty look for charters a team could actually use when things go wrong. Rules with numbers and deadlines are easier to follow and to evaluate. Growth opportunities that members would recognize in themselves show honesty. A plan to check team health before problems escalate shows maturity. Charters that tie rules to the team's project show purpose. Faculty also notice whether every member's voice appears, rather than one person writing the charter alone.
DNP 709 Module 5 help with common mistakes
Charters often contain rules nobody could enforce, such as "be respectful." Turn each rule into a behavior with a number or deadline. Another is listing strengths for everyone and growth areas for no one; each member should name one. Decide how you will make decisions when you disagree before you need to. Agree on a single shared folder and file naming. If you would like help drafting your team charter, send the template and your team's notes to the desk. Revisit the charter after the peer review and change what is not working. Keep the final version where every member can find it. Ask each member to write their own strengths and growth areas rather than assigning them to each other.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 709 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 709 Module 1: Immersion Reflection: Leadership Vision
- DNP 709 Module 2: Leader Reflection Mind Map
- DNP 709 Module 3: Faces of Innovation Discussion
- DNP 709 Module 4: Leader Self-Assessment Paper
- DNP 709 Module 6: Immersion Reflection: Conflict Plan
- DNP 709 Module 7: Complexity and Culture of Innovation Discussion
- DNP 709 Module 8: Change Theory Comparison and Application
- DNP 709 Module 9: Case for Innovation Presentation
- DNP 709 Module 10: Innovation Leadership Synthesis Paper
- DNP 675 Module 1: Autism Reflection
- DNP 704 Module 4: Evidence-Based Practice Final Paper (Paper 4)
- DNP 606 Module 6: Case Study 3: Pediatric Status Epilepticus
- DNP 672 Module 1: Stimulants Versus Non-Stimulants Discussion
DNP 709 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 709 Module 5 sample paper?
The team charter above is a full sample: purpose, member strengths and growth areas, ground rules, meetings, roles, decisions, conflict steps and a health check for a learning community.
How many points is the DNP 709 Team Charter?
The Team Charter is a 40-point team assignment in Week 7.
What must the DNP 709 team charter include?
Ground rules, meeting dates and times, and each member's strengths and growth opportunities.
What is psychological safety in a team?
Teammates believe they can raise mistakes and worries without paying a price for it.
What are Tuckman's stages of team development?
Forming, storming, norming and performing.