| Course | DNP 679 Biostatistics Principles of Statistical Inference |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Descriptive statistics write-up |
| Length | About 831 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 679 Module 1
Seventy-Five Adults and a Skewed Scale: Describing the Class's Insomnia Severity Index Data
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 679: Biostatistics: Principles of Statistical Inference
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Seventy-Five Adults and a Skewed Scale: Describing the Class's Insomnia Severity Index Data
Purpose and Data
This write-up describes the data our cohort collected before Immersion 1. Each of 15 students administered the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) to five adult volunteers and recorded age, sex and whether the person worked rotating or night shifts, giving a pooled file of 75 records. The ISI asks seven questions about the past two weeks, each rated 0 to 4, and sums them to a total of 0 to 28 (Bastien et al., 2001). The purpose here is description only: to summarize who answered and how their scores are distributed, not to test a hypothesis. The figures that follow are the hypothetical teaching values used for this sample.
Data Checks Before Analysis
Before summarizing, the pooled file was screened. Each record was checked for missing items, since an ISI total is only valid when all seven items are answered; two records with one blank item were returned to the students who collected them and completed, so no data are missing. Every item was confirmed to fall between 0 and 4 and every total between 0 and 28, and ages were checked for impossible values. Sex and shift work were coded as numbers with labels, so Intellectus would treat them as categories rather than quantities.
Levels of Measurement
Each variable was classified before any statistic was chosen, because the level of measurement decides which summaries are meaningful (Polit & Beck, 2021). Sex and shift work status are nominal: their categories have no order, so they are summarized with counts and percentages. ISI severity category (none, subthreshold, moderate, severe) is ordinal, since the categories are ordered but the distances between them are not equal. Age is a ratio variable with a true zero. The ISI total is a summed rating scale; strictly it is ordinal, but by convention it is treated as interval for analysis, which permits a mean and standard deviation as long as the shape of the distribution is reported alongside them.
| Variable | Level of measurement | Summary used |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Nominal | Count and percentage |
| Shift work (yes or no) | Nominal | Count and percentage |
| ISI severity category | Ordinal | Count, percentage and mode |
| Age in years | Ratio | Mean, standard deviation, median and range |
| ISI total score (0 to 28) | Treated as interval | Median and interquartile range, with mean and standard deviation |
Results
Of the 75 respondents, 49 (65.3%) were female and 26 (34.7%) male, and 20 (26.7%) worked rotating or night shifts. Ages ranged from 19 to 69 years, with a mean of 41.7 (SD = 12.4) and a median of 42, close enough to suggest a fairly symmetric age distribution.
ISI totals ranged from 2 to 22, with a median of 9 and an interquartile range of 7 to 13. The mean was 10.2 (SD = 4.5) and the mode 9. In Intellectus, the histogram showed most scores clustered between 5 and 14 with a tail toward higher values, and the skewness statistic was 0.47, a mild right skew. The box plot showed no values beyond the whiskers. Because the mean sits above the median, pulled by the few higher scores, the median and interquartile range are the better primary summary, with the mean reported for comparison with published studies.
Half of the sample fell in the subthreshold range, and 13 respondents (17.3%) scored 15 or higher, in the moderate or severe clinical range. Morin et al. (2011) found that a cutoff of 10 best separated insomnia cases from good sleepers in a community sample; by that threshold, 37 of our respondents would screen positive, though the cutoff was validated for screening, not diagnosis.
| ISI severity category | Score range | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| No clinically significant insomnia | 0 to 7 | 24 | 32.0 |
| Subthreshold insomnia | 8 to 14 | 38 | 50.7 |
| Moderate clinical insomnia | 15 to 21 | 12 | 16.0 |
| Severe clinical insomnia | 22 to 28 | 1 | 1.3 |
| Total | 75 | 100.0 |
Research Design and Its Limits
These data come from a cross-sectional design with a convenience sample. Everyone was measured once, so the data describe a single moment and cannot show change or sequence. Respondents were family members, friends and coworkers of nursing students, so they are likely healthier, more educated and more likely to work in health care than adults in general, and the results cannot be generalized to a population. The shift work proportion, for example, almost certainly reflects who nursing students know. Fifteen different people administered the questionnaire, which adds variation in how instructions were given. These limits do not make the data useless; they make them suitable for practicing description and for generating questions, such as whether shift workers score higher, that a better designed study could answer.
Summary
The pooled class sample was mostly female, middle-aged and one quarter shift workers. Insomnia severity was mildly right-skewed, centered on the subthreshold range, with about one in six respondents in the clinical range. The median of 9 and interquartile range of 7 to 13 describe the typical respondent best.
References
Bastien, C. H., Vallieres, A., & Morin, C. M. (2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Medicine, 2(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4
Morin, C. M., Belleville, G., Belanger, L., & Ivers, H. (2011). The Insomnia Severity Index: Psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep, 34(5), 601-608. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/34.5.601
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
What the DNP 679 Module 1 instructions ask for
The first written assignment in DNP 679 grows out of a data collection task. Before Immersion 1, each student administers the Insomnia Severity Scale to five subjects, following detailed instructions in Canvas. At the immersion the class works with the combined data, and afterward each student conducts descriptive statistics in Intellectus and submits the Post Immersion 1 Written Assignment by the Week 2 deadline. It is worth 5 of the course's 130 points and graded pass or fail. Week 2 covers Fundamentals of Statistics II, descriptive statistics and research design, after a first week on measurement, levels of measurement and probability, so a passing write-up classifies every variable, pairs it with a fitting summary and names the design plainly.
How this DNP 679 Module 1 example is built
Short as it is, the sample reads like the descriptive section of a research report. It begins by explaining where the data came from and limiting the purpose to description. A section on levels of measurement classifies each variable and uses a table to pair every level with its summary statistic, flagging the ISI total as the one variable where a convention is applied. Results move from the sample's demographics to the distribution of the ISI score, reporting the median and interquartile range first because of the right skew, then the mean and standard deviation, then the histogram and box plot findings. A second table counts the severity categories. A design section names the cross-sectional convenience design and explains each limit in terms of these particular respondents.
Reading the DNP 679 Module 1 grading rubric
As a pass or fail item worth 5 points, this assignment is judged on completeness and accuracy more than polish. The rubric in Canvas will set the exact criteria, but a passing write-up generally classifies each variable correctly, uses summaries that suit each level of measurement, reports the statistics accurately from the Intellectus output, describes the shape of the distribution and comments on the research design. Faculty will notice a mean reported for a nominal variable or a design described as experimental. Because grading is pass or fail, every required element matters, so check the Canvas instructions line by line. The syllabus deducts 3% a day for late work up to five days and gives zero afterward, a real risk on a 5-point item.
DNP 679 Module 1 help from the desk
The most frequent mistake is reporting a mean and standard deviation for everything Intellectus produces, including sex or shift status. Match each statistic to its level. A second is ignoring shape: if the histogram is skewed, say so and lead with the median. Do not call a convenience sample representative, and do not imply cause from a single measurement. Report percentages with their counts so a reader can check them. Keep the subjects you collected anonymous; the write-up needs no names. Remember that generative AI is not permitted for any part of this course's work, drafts included, so treat any sample strictly as a model of structure. If you send the desk your own Intellectus output, it can help you check that each summary fits its variable.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 679 and Doctor of Nursing Practice sample papers
- DNP 679 Module 2: Post Immersion 2 Written Assignment: Independent t-Test and Mann-Whitney U Test
- DNP 679 Module 3: Paired t-Test Written Assignment
- DNP 679 Module 4: Chi-Square Test Written Assignment
- DNP 679 Module 5: One-Way ANOVA Written Assignment
- DNP 679 Module 6: Practice Paper Critique: Statistics in a Randomized Trial of Transitional Care
- DNP 679 Module 7: Final Paper Critique: Statistics in an Observational Study of Nurse Staffing and Surgical Mortality
- DNP 714 Module 1: Individual Assignment 1: Coordination, Communication and Collaboration MindMap
- DNP 643 Module 4: Case Study 4: Care of the School-Aged Child (Nocturnal Enuresis)
- DNP 606 Module 5: Interprofessional Practice Discussion
- DNP 671 Module 7: Discussion: Interviewing Older Adults and Patients With Psychosis
DNP 679 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 679 Module 1 sample paper?
This page holds a full DNP 679 Module 1 sample: the Post Immersion 1 descriptive statistics write-up on pooled Insomnia Severity Index data, with levels of measurement, two tables and a design section.
What are the four levels of measurement?
Nominal (unordered categories), ordinal (ordered categories), interval (equal distances without a true zero) and ratio (equal distances with a true zero, such as age or weight).
When should I report the median instead of the mean?
Lead with the median and interquartile range when a distribution is skewed or has outliers, since a handful of extreme values can drag the mean far from the typical patient, while the median stays put.
What software does DNP 679 use?
The course uses Intellectus Statistics for analysis and data visualization, with assignments completed at home and on a laptop during the three campus immersions.
Is the DNP 679 Post Immersion 1 assignment graded?
Yes, but only as pass or fail; it is worth 5 of the course's 130 points and is due in Week 2 after the first immersion.