| Course | DNP 609 Advanced Practice Nursing Role |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 5 |
| Paper type | Group ethics presentation, slides with speaker notes |
| Length | About 619 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 slide deck with speaker notes |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | DNP |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 609 Module 5
Protecting the Patient When It Is Hard: One Provision of the Code of Ethics Applied to Nurse Practitioner Practice
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
DNP 609: Advanced Practice Nursing Role
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Slide 1: Our Provision
Safeguarding the patient's rights, health and safety. Learning community 3. Advanced Practice Nursing Role.
Speaker notes: Our group was assigned the provision of the Code of Ethics for Nurses that asks nurses to champion and safeguard patients' rights, health and safety (American Nurses Association, 2025). We chose to focus on situations where that duty is hardest to carry out.
Slide 2: Overview of the Provision
Core ideas: protecting privacy and confidentiality; protecting people who take part in research; maintaining standards of competent practice; acting when practice is questionable or impaired.
Speaker notes: The provision asks nurses to safeguard patients from harm that can come from inside health care itself, through breaches of privacy, unsafe research, incompetent practice or impaired colleagues. Advocacy here is not only speaking for patients but also taking action within systems.
Slide 3: Application to Nursing Practice
Keeping health information private. Explaining research participation honestly. Following evidence-based standards. Reporting unsafe practice through the chain of command.
Speaker notes: For any registered nurse, the provision shows up daily: closing a curtain, logging out of a record, questioning an order that seems unsafe, and reporting concerns even when it is uncomfortable.
Slide 4: Why It Is Harder for NPs
NPs make independent diagnostic and prescribing decisions. In Arizona, NPs practice with full authority, without required physician oversight. Fewer layers stand between an NP's decision and the patient.
Speaker notes: As nurse practitioners, our decisions reach patients more directly. Arizona grants full practice authority, so there may be no physician reviewing our prescriptions. That increases our responsibility to protect patients, including from our own errors.
Slide 5: Case 1: A Patient Refuses Treatment
A 61-year-old rancher with a blood pressure of 182/104 declines medication. NP response: explore his reasons, share risks plainly, respect an informed refusal, keep the door open.
Speaker notes: In a survey of primary care NPs, the ethical issue encountered most often was patients refusing appropriate treatment (Laabs, 2005). Protecting his health does not mean overriding his choice. It means making sure the refusal is informed and that he knows he can change his mind.
Slide 6: Case 2: Confidentiality in a Small Town
A teenager asks for contraception; her mother works at the clinic front desk. NP response: confidential visit, restricted record access, a clear explanation of what stays private.
Speaker notes: In a rural clinic, everyone knows everyone. Protecting privacy may require extra steps, such as limiting who can view a chart and scheduling with care.
Slide 7: Case 3: A Colleague's Unsafe Prescribing
An NP colleague prescribes high-dose opioids without monitoring agreements or checking the state prescription monitoring program. NP response: raise the concern directly, then through clinic leadership; document; report if unresolved.
Speaker notes: This is the hardest application. The provision asks us to act on questionable practice, even by a respected colleague. Speaking to the colleague first is often right, but patient safety cannot wait indefinitely.
Slide 8: Case 4: Pressure From Productivity
Clinic schedules 15-minute visits; complex patients need more. NP response: advocate for longer visits for complex care; refuse to cut safety steps.
Speaker notes: Research on primary care NPs describes how they maintain moral integrity by drawing a line and finding a way to act without crossing it (Laabs, 2007). Defending time for safe care is one such line.
Slide 9: Takeaways
Protection includes privacy, competence and courage. Full practice authority raises the stakes. Integrity means knowing your line before the conflict arrives.
Speaker notes: Our main takeaway is that this provision describes not only what we avoid but what we actively defend. As future NPs, we want to decide in advance where our lines are, so we can hold them under pressure.
References
American Nurses Association. (2025). Code of ethics for nurses. https://codeofethics.ana.org/
Laabs, C. A. (2005). Moral problems and distress among nurse practitioners in primary care. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1041-2972.2005.00014.x
Laabs, C. A. (2007). Primary care nurse practitioners' integrity when faced with moral conflict. Nursing Ethics, 14(6), 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007082120
DNP 609 Module 5 instructions, in plain terms
The posted syllabus places the Code of Ethics Discussion Board in Week 5, Code of Ethics for Nurses: Ethics and the Advanced Practice Nurse, worth 20 points. Each learning community is assigned one provision of the Code of Ethics for Nurses (2025) and, as a group, prepares a document or PowerPoint that clearly describes an overview of the provision, its application to nursing practice and its specific application for the advanced practice nurse as a nurse practitioner. No responses to other groups are required. Expect Canvas to name your group's provision and the submission format. Read the provision and its interpretive statements together before dividing the work. Assign one member to check that every slide matches the 2025 edition of the code.
Inside the DNP 609 Module 5 example
The deck follows the three required parts in order: an overview slide, an application to nursing practice slide, and several slides applying the provision to nurse practitioner situations. A slide on why the provision weighs more heavily for NPs, including full practice authority in Arizona, connects the overview to the cases. Each case states a situation and an NP response, and research on NP moral problems supports two of them. A takeaway slide closes the presentation, and the notes carry the explanation. Speaker notes explain each slide in full sentences, so the deck works as a stand-alone document when it is posted to the board without a live presentation. Each case is drawn from a realistic setting.
Reading the DNP 609 Module 5 grading rubric
Group ethics presentations are usually graded on an accurate overview of the assigned provision, clear application to general nursing practice, specific and realistic application to the nurse practitioner role, use of the code and supporting literature, and professional presentation. Faculty look for NP applications that show how the provision guides decisions in real situations, not only restatements of it. Including difficult cases, such as reporting a colleague, demonstrates ethical maturity. Consistency across group members' slides matters. Because no responses are required, the presentation itself carries all the points, so completeness and clarity on every required part are especially important. Every claim needs a citation, either on the slide or in its notes.
DNP 609 Module 5 help with common mistakes
The most common weakness is summarizing the provision without applying it to the NP role. Build cases that an NP would actually face. Another is quoting the code at length; paraphrase and cite. Read the interpretive statements, not just the provision headline. Divide work by case but have one member edit for consistency. Cite the 2025 code, as the syllabus specifies. Groups planning an ethics deck can send the assigned provision to the desk. Choose cases from members' own practice settings, with details changed, so the applications feel real and the group draws on varied experience. Agree on one slide template before dividing the work.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 609 and DNP sample papers
- DNP 609 Module 7: APN Role and DNP Degree Reflection Paper
- DNP 601 Module 1: Introduction and the Role of Theory Post
- DNP 605 Module 3: Advanced SOAP Note With Differential Diagnoses
- DNP 603 Module 2: Theoretical Foundations of Social Justice Paper
- DNP 610 Module 3: Mock Code OSCE Reflection
DNP 609 Module 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DNP 609 Module 5 sample paper?
See the complete Code of Ethics presentation above, nine annotated slides on protecting patients' rights, health and safety, applied to nursing practice and to four nurse practitioner cases.
What is the DNP 609 Code of Ethics assignment?
Each learning community prepares a document or PowerPoint on one assigned provision, covering an overview, application to nursing practice and application to the nurse practitioner role.
Which edition of the Code of Ethics does DNP 609 use?
The syllabus specifies the Code of Ethics for Nurses (2025).
Do I need to reply to other groups in DNP 609?
No. The syllabus states that no responses are required for this discussion board.
Why does the Code of Ethics matter more for nurse practitioners?
NPs make independent diagnostic and prescribing decisions, often with fewer layers of review, so their ethical choices reach patients more directly.