| Course | SWG 632 Policy Practice |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 10 |
| Paper type | Advocacy fact sheet |
| Length | About 345 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Master of Social Work |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for SWG 632 Module 10
Fact Sheet: 35 Homes for Every 100 Families Who Need Them
Student Name
Master of Social Work, Arizona State University
SWG 632: Policy Practice
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Fact Sheet: 35 Homes for Every 100 Families Who Need Them
The Problem
The lowest-income renters in the United States face a shortage of 7.1 million affordable homes, and 75% of them are severely rent-burdened, paying over half their income for housing (National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2025). Without help, these households are one emergency away from eviction or homelessness.
Our Ask
We ask members of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development to fund additional Housing Choice Vouchers in the coming fiscal year, targeted to households with extremely low incomes.
Background
By federal definition, an extremely low-income household's earnings sit at or below whichever is higher, the poverty guideline or three-tenths of local median income. Nationally, there are only 35 affordable and available homes for every 100 such households, and every state falls short (National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2025). Households of color are overrepresented among those affected. Housing Choice Vouchers, authorized under federal law (42 U.S.C. § 1437f), let families rent private homes while paying about 30% of their income, but because funding is set each year, most eligible families wait years or never receive one.
Analysis
Vouchers are one of the best-tested tools against housing instability. In the Moving to Opportunity experiment, young children whose families moved with a voucher to a less poor area grew up to earn about 31% more (Chetty et al., 2016). For people already homeless, Housing First programs that provide housing without preconditions helped participants get housed sooner and stay housed (Tsemberis et al., 2004). Funding more vouchers targets help to those with the greatest need and builds on an existing delivery system run by local housing agencies.
| Key fact | Figure |
|---|---|
| Affordable homes per 100 extremely low-income renters | 35 |
| Extremely low-income renters with severe rent burden | 75% |
| Earnings gain for children who moved young with a voucher | About 31% |
What You Can Do
Support funding for additional vouchers in this year's bill, and ask the Department of Housing and Urban Development to report how many eligible households remain on waiting lists in your district.
References
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855-902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572
Low-income housing assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (2024).
National Low Income Housing Coalition. (2025). The gap: A shortage of affordable homes. https://nlihc.org/gap
Tsemberis, S., Gulcur, L., & Nakae, M. (2004). Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 651-656. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.4.651
Reading the SWG 632 Module 10 assignment instructions
Assignment 5 in SWG 632 is a 100-point individual fact sheet due in Module 10. Using your group's panel issue from the mock congressional hearing, create a concise one-page fact sheet or infographic for the policymakers targeted in the hearing. It must include a problem statement of one or two sentences with footnoted facts and definitions; a specific ask of one or two sentences that tells the policymaker exactly how to help; relevant background explaining why the issue matters and its causes, supported by credible research; and an analysis that supports your recommendation. Your sources must include at least three outside the course text; design matters too, so make the page easy to scan. Write for a reader with one minute to spare.
How this SWG 632 Module 10 example is built
The sample uses the required sections as its headings, presented in the order a policymaker reads. The problem statement fits in two sentences, and the ask names the exact committee and action. Background defines extremely low income, gives the core statistics and explains why vouchers are limited. The analysis summarizes experimental and trial evidence briefly, and a three-row table highlights the numbers to remember. The page ends with a concrete action. Sources are cited in the text here; on the submitted page they would appear as footnotes, as the assignment directs. Margin notes explain why the ask and the closing action matter most. The table repeats the three numbers a legislator should remember.
SWG 632 Module 10 rubric: what earns full marks
Graders look for a clear, concise problem statement, a specific and actionable ask, background supported by credible sources, an analysis that logically supports the recommendation and a visually appealing single page with at least three references beyond the textbook. Fact sheets lose points when they exceed one page, when the ask is vague, when facts lack sources, when the analysis relies on opinion or when the design makes the message hard to find. Because the audience is a busy policymaker, every sentence should earn its place. A fact sheet that a reader can understand in under a minute usually scores well on clarity. Footnoted facts protect credibility.
SWG 632 Module 10 help with common mistakes
Start by writing the ask in one sentence. Choose the two or three numbers that make the case most clearly. Define any term a policymaker might not know. Keep background to causes and stakes. Make the analysis show why your ask is the right response. Use a simple layout with headings and white space. Footnote every fact. If design tools feel intimidating, the desk can suggest a clean layout. Read it in one minute to test it. Print the page and look at it from arm's length; if the ask does not stand out, change the layout. Ask a classmate to find the ask in ten seconds. Keep fonts large and readable.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More SWG 632 and Master of Social Work sample papers
- SWG 632 Module 2: Field Placement Ethical Dilemma Case Study: A Sobriety Rule at a Shelter
- SWG 632 Module 4: Field Placement Ethical Dilemma Essay: Analyzing a Shelter Sobriety Proposal
- SWG 632 Module 8: Policy Analysis Paper: The Housing Choice Voucher Program Through Gilbert and Terrell
- SWG 573 Module 3: Advocacy Project Reflection: Asking a Legislator to Protect Home-Delivered Meals
- SWG 623 Module 6: Written Evaluation Plan: Measuring Whether a Family Program Strengthens Protective Factors
- SWG 571 Module 7: Assessment Paper: Late-Life Depression, Grief and Drinking in a Recently Widowed Man
SWG 632 Module 10 questions, answered
Where can I find a free SWG 632 Module 10 sample paper?
The full one-page fact sheet on expanding housing vouchers is on this page.
What must the SWG 632 fact sheet include?
A problem statement, a specific ask, background, analysis and at least three references beyond the textbook.
How long is the SWG 632 fact sheet?
One page.
What is an "ask" in a policy fact sheet?
A specific request that tells the policymaker exactly how to help.
Who is the audience for the SWG 632 fact sheet?
The policymakers targeted in the student's mock congressional hearing.