| Course | NUR 495 Public and Global Health in Nursing |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Health policy paper (5 to 7 pages) |
| Length | About 1,082 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | RN to BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 495 Module 4
Twelve Months, Not Sixty Days: Extending Postpartum Medicaid Coverage in Arizona and What Nurses Should Ask For Next
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
NUR 495: Public and Global Health in Nursing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Twelve Months, Not Sixty Days: Extending Postpartum Medicaid Coverage in Arizona and What Nurses Should Ask For Next
Introduction
Pregnancy is often the moment when low-income women gain health coverage, and the end of pregnancy can be the moment they lose it. For years, Medicaid coverage based on pregnancy ended about 60 days after birth, even though many serious complications and deaths occur later in the first postpartum year. This paper examines Arizona's response, a year of postpartum Medicaid in place of roughly 60 days, and recommends further changes that would strengthen its effect for a vulnerable population.
The Vulnerable Population
The population is low-income women in Arizona who are covered by Medicaid during pregnancy, many of whom would otherwise be uninsured after the postpartum period ends. Public health nursing describes vulnerability as the result of several risks combining, such as low income, limited access to care and chronic health conditions (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2024). Postpartum women add physical recovery, the care of a newborn and a high risk of depression to these risks. In Arizona, Medicaid, administered by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, pays for a large share of births, so the policy affects a substantial part of the state's mothers and infants.
The Problem
Maternal deaths in the United States are high compared with other wealthy countries, and many occur after the first six weeks postpartum. A CDC analysis of national surveillance data found that about one in nine pregnancy-related deaths with known timing, 11.7%, came after the sixth postpartum week but within the year, with another 21.4% in weeks one through six, with cardiovascular conditions among the leading causes (Petersen et al., 2019). State review committees in the same report judged about 60% of pregnancy-related deaths preventable. When coverage ends at 60 days, women with high blood pressure, diabetes, depression or substance use disorders may lose access to treatment exactly when risk persists. Arizona's own birth data show the scale of the population at stake: the state recorded about 6,300 low-birthweight births and 430 infant deaths in 2023 (Arizona Department of Health Services, 2024), and the health of mothers after birth is closely tied to the health of their infants.
The Policy
Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, states gained the choice to keep pregnancy-based Medicaid and CHIP enrollees covered for a full year after birth, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 made that option permanent. Arizona adopted the 12-month extension, so eligible women now keep coverage for a full year after giving birth instead of about 60 days. The policy does not change who is eligible during pregnancy; it lengthens how long eligible women remain covered afterward.
Stakeholders
Who Gains, Who Pays, Who Decides Postpartum women gain continuity of care and protection from medical debt. Medicaid managed care plans and the state carry the added cost of a longer coverage period, partly offset by federal matching funds and by care that prevents more expensive emergencies. Obstetric and primary care providers gain the ability to manage conditions such as hypertension over the full first year. Hospitals benefit when fewer patients return through the emergency department without coverage. Maternal health advocates and nursing organizations supported postpartum extensions nationally, while some policymakers raised concerns about cost. Understanding these interests matters for any recommendation, because changes that build on the extension will need support from the agency, the health plans and the legislature.
Economic Considerations
Our module's economic analysis certificate emphasized comparing costs with the outcomes they buy. Extending coverage increases Medicaid spending for each enrolled mother after birth. Against that, the policy can avert costs from untreated postpartum conditions: hospitalizations for severe hypertension, emergency care for untreated depression or substance use, and the lifetime costs of maternal deaths and disability. A full cost-benefit analysis for Arizona is not yet available, which is one reason the recommendation below calls for routine reporting of outcomes.
Evidence on Coverage Continuity
Evidence supports the logic of the policy. Studies of insurance churn after birth have found that many low-income women lose coverage or change coverage in the months after delivery, which interrupts care for chronic conditions and mental health. Continuous coverage is a prerequisite for the follow-up that prevents late postpartum deaths, such as blood pressure management, depression treatment and addiction care. The CDC review grouped contributing factors at the community, facility, patient, provider and system levels and listed improving access to, and coordination of, quality care among its prevention strategies (Petersen et al., 2019).
Remaining Weaknesses
Extending coverage is necessary but not sufficient. First, coverage does not guarantee care: a mother must know she is still covered, find a provider who accepts Medicaid, and have time and transportation to attend visits. Second, many postpartum visits remain concentrated in the first six weeks, with little planned contact afterward. Third, women who were uninsured during pregnancy, including some immigrant women who may receive only emergency coverage, do not benefit. Fourth, data on whether the extension is improving outcomes in Arizona are not yet widely reported, which limits accountability.
Recommendation
I recommend that Arizona pair the 12-month coverage extension with a structured postpartum care pathway for Medicaid enrollees that includes three elements. First, every Medicaid-covered birth should trigger a postpartum care plan at discharge listing scheduled contacts at one, three, six and twelve months, with blood pressure and depression screening. Second, the state should fund nurse home visiting or telephone outreach for women with hypertension, diabetes, depression or substance use disorder during pregnancy. Third, the state should publish annual data on postpartum visit rates, readmissions and pregnancy-related deaths among Medicaid enrollees, so the policy's effect can be measured.
Implications for Nursing
Nurses are central to this recommendation. Labor and delivery and postpartum nurses can tell every eligible mother before discharge that her coverage now lasts 12 months and help her schedule follow-up. Public health nurses and home visiting nurses can provide the contacts that turn coverage into care. Nurses can also advocate through professional organizations and testimony for data reporting and funding. Health policy, as our course readings note, is shaped by those who participate in it (Friberg & Saewert, 2023), and nurses see the gap between coverage and care every day.
Conclusion
Extending postpartum Medicaid coverage to 12 months addresses a real gap that left low-income mothers uninsured during a dangerous period. To realize its promise, Arizona should build a postpartum care pathway, reach high-risk mothers with nursing outreach and measure the results. Nurses are well placed to make that happen.
References
Arizona Department of Health Services. (2024). Advance vital statistics by county of residence, Arizona, 2023. https://pub.azdhs.gov/health-stats/report/avs/avs23/pdf/avs2023.pdf
Friberg, E. E., & Saewert, K. J. (Eds.). (2023). Conceptual foundations: The bridge to professional nursing practice (8th ed.). Elsevier.
Petersen, E. E., Davis, N. L., Goodman, D., Cox, S., Mayes, N., Johnston, E., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K., Callaghan, W. M., & Barfield, W. (2019). Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013-2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(18), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6818e1
Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2024). Public health nursing: Population-centered health care in the community (11th ed.). Elsevier.
What the NUR 495 Module 4 instructions ask for
In the syllabus, the policy module combines readings from the public health nursing text and the conceptual foundations text with this written assignment on health policy and its impact on vulnerable populations and an economic analysis certificate. The paper is worth 20% of the course and must be five to seven pages in APA format. It asks you to develop a public health policy, or describe a policy recommendation for change, affecting a vulnerable population at the level of a country or smaller, such as a state, county or city. Expect to define the population, explain the problem with data, describe the policy, evaluate evidence and gaps, and make a recommendation. Check Canvas for headings and source counts.
How this NUR 495 Module 4 example is built
The paper defines a clear vulnerable population, low-income women covered by Medicaid during pregnancy in Arizona, and explains why the end of coverage creates risk. The problem section uses CDC surveillance and review findings on the timing of deaths and state vital statistics. The policy section explains the federal option and Arizona's adoption plainly. Evidence on coverage continuity and four remaining weaknesses lead to a three-part recommendation with measurable elements. A section on nursing implications shows how nurses at different levels would carry it out, and a short conclusion restates the argument. Stakeholder and economic sections show the political and financial context any recommendation must work within. Margin notes point out the rubric row each section serves.
NUR 495 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks
Policy papers are usually graded on a clearly defined vulnerable population, an accurate explanation of the problem with data, a correct description of the policy and its level of government, analysis of evidence and gaps, a specific and feasible recommendation, and discussion of the nursing role, along with APA format and length. Graders look for policies at the scale the prompt allows, here a state, and for recommendations that respond to the weaknesses identified. Papers that describe a policy without evaluating it, or that make vague recommendations, usually lose points in the analysis rows. Including stakeholders and costs often lifts a policy paper from description to analysis. A recommendation with measurable elements also makes evaluation possible.
NUR 495 Module 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students often pick a federal law that is too large to analyze in five pages. Focus on one provision and how it plays out in your state. Check that you describe the policy accurately, including dates and what it does and does not change. Use state data where possible. Make the recommendation specific, with who would do what. Stay within five to seven pages. Cite government reports by agency and year. If you would like help with a policy paper on an issue in your community, send the prompt and your topic to the desk. Read your recommendation aloud and ask who would have to act to make it happen; if you cannot name them, make it more specific.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 495 and RN to BSN sample papers
- NUR 495 Module 1: Introductory Presentation on Public Health Values
- NUR 495 Module 3: Global Health Project on Postpartum Hemorrhage
- NUR 495 Module 6: Maternal and Infant Health Reflection
- NUR 392 Module 5: We Are Family Meeting Presentation
- NUR 445 Module 6: Public Policy Group Discussion
- NUR 440 Module 6: Education Project Elevator Speech
- NUR 444 Module 7: Journal Club Discussion on Innovative Organizations
NUR 495 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 495 Module 4 sample paper?
The full health policy paper is shown above: Arizona's 12-month postpartum Medicaid extension, the vulnerable population, the problem, evidence, remaining gaps, a three-part recommendation and nursing implications.
How long is the NUR 495 health policy paper?
The syllabus sets it at five to seven pages in APA format, worth 20% of the course.
What level of policy can I write about in NUR 495?
A country-level policy or one at a smaller level, such as a state, county or city, affecting a vulnerable population.
Does the NUR 495 policy paper need a recommendation?
Yes. The prompt asks you to develop a policy or describe a recommendation for change, so end with specific, feasible proposals.
Where can I find maternal health data for a NUR 495 paper?
State health department vital statistics reports and the CDC's maternal mortality review committee reports are reliable sources.