| Course | NUR 405 Professional Nurse Concepts Advanced |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Reflection on a group question-analysis session |
| Length | About 440 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BSN in Nursing |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 405 Module 2
The Answer I Changed: Reflecting on a Group Session With NCLEX-Style Prioritization Questions
Student Name
Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University
NUR 405: Professional Nurse Concepts: Advanced
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
The Answer I Changed: Reflecting on a Group Session With NCLEX-Style Prioritization Questions
What We Did
Our group of four worked through five case-based items in fifty minutes. Each item gave a client situation and asked us to recognize cues, prioritize hypotheses and choose actions. We took turns reading each case aloud, answered silently, then compared answers and argued until we agreed or ran out of time.
How We Used the Frameworks
For three items, airway, breathing and circulation settled the order quickly. One item about a client with new confusion and a low sodium required Maslow plus a safety check, because the physiological need came with a fall risk. The hardest item was about delegation: which of four tasks could the nurse assign to assistive personnel on a busy medical unit.
The Answer I Changed
I chose to delegate ambulating a client who had been on bed rest for three days after a hip fracture repair. A classmate pointed out that the first time a client gets up after prolonged bed rest, the nurse should assess tolerance, because the risk of orthostatic hypotension and falls makes it not yet a stable, routine task. I had focused on the word "ambulate" and missed "first time." I changed my answer to delegating vital signs on a stable client, which our faculty confirmed.
What the Session Showed About My Thinking
The NCSBN clinical judgment model breaks clinical reasoning into steps from recognizing and analyzing cues through taking action and evaluating outcomes (Dickison et al., 2019). Our group was good at taking action and weaker at recognizing cues: most of our wrong first answers came from reading too fast and missing a single word or trend. Tanner (2006) describes noticing as the first step of clinical judgment, shaped by what a nurse expects to see. I expected a routine ambulation task, so I did not notice what made it different.
Benner (1982) described how novices rely on rules while experts see situations as wholes; the delegation item caught me applying a rule, "ambulation can be delegated," without seeing the whole situation. The group format helped. Hearing someone else's reasoning made my own reasoning visible, and arguing about the delegation item taught me more than getting it right alone would have.
What I Will Change
I will stop reading answer choices before I have finished reading the stem. For each practice question this month, I will underline the words that change the situation, such as "first," "new" and "after," before looking at the options, and I will record each missed question in a log grouped by the clinical judgment step where I went wrong.
References
Benner, P. (1982). From novice to expert. American Journal of Nursing, 82(3), 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-198282030-00004
Dickison, P., Haerling, K. A., & Lasater, K. (2019). Integrating the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Clinical Judgment Model into nursing educational frameworks. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(2), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190122-03
Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-04
What the NUR 405 Module 2 instructions ask for
The posted syllabus lists the In Seat Class Activity: NCLEX Practice and Reflection at 2 of the course's 100 points. In class, students work in groups to analyze NCLEX-style questions and practice applying prioritization frameworks, and afterward each student writes a reflection on the experience. You must be present for the group work, so check the class schedule. Canvas sets the reflection's length and prompts. Expect to describe what your group did, how you used frameworks such as airway, breathing and circulation, Maslow and delegation principles, what you learned about your own reasoning and what you will change in your preparation. A specific question you got wrong, or changed, usually makes the strongest reflection, because it shows exactly how your thinking moved.
How the NUR 405 Module 2 example is put together
The reflection begins with a short account of how the group worked through five case-based items. A paragraph shows how frameworks guided three of them and where they needed combining. The center of the paper is one delegation item, the student's first answer, the word she missed and the classmate's reasoning that changed her mind. The next section connects the pattern of errors to the steps of the clinical judgment model and to Tanner's idea of noticing, and notes the value of hearing others' reasoning. A final section sets one concrete study change with a way to track it. Two clinical judgment sources support the paper. The paper stays short, in keeping with an assignment worth two points, while still showing real reflection.
NUR 405 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
Reflections on in-class activities are usually graded on whether the student took part, describes the activity accurately, applies the frameworks correctly, reflects honestly on personal reasoning and names a specific next step. A changed or missed answer, explained in detail, shows deeper learning than a list of correct answers. Linking errors to a model of clinical judgment demonstrates understanding of how the exam is built. Specific study changes earn more than general promises to study harder. Because the points are few, clarity and honesty matter more than length. Faculty may also look for evidence that the group discussion shaped the student's thinking. Naming the specific reasoning step that failed, such as noticing a cue, is a sign of mature self-assessment.
NUR 405 Module 2 help with common mistakes
Many students write a reflection that only says the session was helpful. Name one item, your first answer and why it changed. Another weak spot is vague next steps; say exactly what you will do and how often. Do not reproduce copyrighted test questions word for word; paraphrase the situation. Tell the desk which items gave your group trouble and what you decided, and a reflection can be drafted from that account. Keep a running log of missed practice questions sorted by the step where your reasoning failed. Review delegation rules for your state before the exam, since they appear often.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 405 and BSN in Nursing sample papers
- NUR 405 Module 1: AI Prioritization Activity
- NUR 405 Module 3: Bioethical Dilemma Group Presentation
- NUR 405 Module 4: Group Paper: Initiating, Supporting and Sustaining Change
- NUR 458 Module 8: Journal Club Entry
- NUR 402 Module 2: Tool Box of Community Resources
- NUR 453 Module 7: Paper 3: Individual HCA Innovation Paper Outline
- NUR 404 Module 4: Group Presentation: A Domain of the Essentials
NUR 405 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 405 Module 2 sample paper?
This page holds a full NUR 405 NCLEX Practice and Reflection sample built around a delegation item the student changed after group discussion.
How many points is the NUR 405 NCLEX reflection worth?
The posted syllabus lists the In Seat Class Activity: NCLEX Practice and Reflection at 2 of 100 points.
What should an NCLEX practice reflection include?
What your group did, how you used prioritization frameworks, one item that challenged you, what it revealed about your reasoning and a specific study change.
What is the NCSBN clinical judgment model?
It is the model the licensure exam is built on, and it breaks clinical judgment into six steps that run from noticing which cues matter to judging whether the action helped.
Can a nurse delegate ambulating a patient?
Routine ambulation of a stable patient can often be delegated, but the first time a patient gets up after prolonged bed rest usually calls for nursing assessment.