| Course | HEP 454 Health Promotion Program Planning and Implementation |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 10 |
| Paper type | Final program plan |
| Length | About 1,068 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BS in Health Education and Health Promotion |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HEP 454 Module 10
Sleep for Your Heart Pinal: A Health Promotion Program Plan for Working Adults in Pinal County, Arizona
Student Name
BS in Health Education and Health Promotion, Arizona State University
HEP 454: Health Promotion Program Planning and Implementation
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Sleep for Your Heart Pinal: A Health Promotion Program Plan for Working Adults in Pinal County, Arizona
Executive Summary
Sleep for Your Heart Pinal is a one-year program to help working-age residents of Pinal County, Arizona, reach seven or more hours of sleep nightly as part of heart disease prevention. It pairs community workshops held over four weeks with twice-weekly English and Spanish texts and asks employers to pledge to adopt sleep-friendly scheduling. The first year will serve about 300 completers at a cost of $48,600.
Community Need
More than four in ten Pinal County adults, 41.1%, report sleeping under seven hours, a higher share than in Maricopa County at 34.9% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). Adults need seven hours or more for good health (Watson et al., 2015), and short sleepers face a substantially greater risk of coronary heart disease (Cappuccio et al., 2011). Nationally, healthy sleep is less common among several racial and ethnic minority groups (Liu et al., 2016), and shift work, common in the county's warehouses, hospitals and prisons, adds risk (Redeker et al., 2019). The American Heart Association now scores sleep as one of eight parts of cardiovascular health (Lloyd-Jones et al., 2022), and the national proportion of adults with enough sleep has fallen to 69.5%, below the Healthy People 2030 target of 73.3% (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion [ODPHP], n.d.).
Mission, Goals and Objectives
Mission: to make a full night's sleep a realistic part of heart health for the county's working adults, at home and on the job.
Goals: raise the share of working-age adults who sleep seven hours or more, and make county workplaces with shift and long-hours staff more supportive of sleep.
| Level | Objective | Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Process | Deliver 12 workshop series by March 31, 2027 | Session logs |
| Process | 300 adults attend three of four sessions by March 31, 2027 | Sign-in sheets |
| Process | Five employers sign the pledge by June 30, 2027 | Signed pledges |
| Impact | 80% of completers know the seven-hour minimum at the end of the series | Pre and post survey |
| Impact | Mean perceived susceptibility rises by one point on a five-point scale | Pre and post survey |
| Impact | 60% keep a regular wake time five days a week at three months | Follow-up survey |
| Outcome | Share sleeping seven hours or more on weeknights rises 15 points at three months | Follow-up survey |
Theory
The plan draws on the Health Belief Model, under which people take action against a health threat when they see themselves at risk, judge the threat serious, expect benefits that outweigh barriers, encounter cues and believe they can succeed (Rosenstock, 1974). Pinal adults rarely connect sleep to heart disease and face real barriers, so the program targets beliefs and barriers together.
Program Activities
Workshop Series
Four weekly 75-minute sessions in English and Spanish at libraries and Central Arizona College campuses, offered on weekday evenings and Saturday mornings with a children's activity room. The sessions move from county data and the heart connection, to how sleep works, to practical habits and a one-week sleep diary, to a personal goal and a plan for barriers. Cognitive and behavioral sleep education for adults without sleep disorders has improved sleep quality in randomized trials (Murawski et al., 2018).
Sleep Cues Texts
Participants who opt in receive two texts a week for 12 weeks: an evening reminder of their wind-down time and a morning prompt about a steady wake time, with a weekly heart and sleep fact. They may text back hours slept for a weekly summary.
Workplace Pledge
Employers of 50 or more agree to post schedules two weeks ahead, avoid giving workers under 11 hours between shifts where operations allow and host one paid workshop series on site. Staff support each employer for six months.
Social Marketing
The plan treats attendance and a steady sleep schedule as an exchange: people give time and evening habits in return for energy and a healthier heart (Grier & Bryant, 2005). Commuting parents are reached through schools, libraries and county social media with a family and energy message; shift workers are reached in break rooms and through supervisors with a safety message. Messages are pretested with five members of each segment, and sign-ups are tracked by channel.
Budget
The cost per expected completer is about $162. Venues are donated by the county library district and Central Arizona College.
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Health educator, 0.5 FTE | $26,000 |
| Fringe benefits at 30% | $7,800 |
| Take-home sleep kits, 300 at $12 | $3,600 |
| Text message service | $1,800 |
| Translation and printing | $2,400 |
| Children's activity room staffing | $2,000 |
| Evaluation consultant | $4,000 |
| Marketing and pretesting | $1,000 |
| Total | $48,600 |
Timeline
| Period | Milestones |
|---|---|
| October to November 2026 | Hire educator; recruit employers; pretest messages; finalize surveys |
| December 2026 | Launch marketing; train facilitators; open text enrollment |
| January to March 2027 | Run 12 community and workplace series; collect pre and post surveys |
| April to June 2027 | Three-month follow-ups; employer pledge support continues |
| July to September 2027 | Analyze data; report to partners; plan year two |
Logic Model
| Resources | Activities | Outputs | Early outcomes | Later outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Educator, partners, venues, $48,600 | Workshops, texts, workplace pledge | 12 series, 300 completers, five pledges | Knowledge, perceived risk, regular wake times | More adults sleeping seven hours; lower heart disease risk over time |
Evaluation Plan
Process evaluation will use session logs, sign-in sheets, text delivery reports and signed pledges to test the three process objectives and to monitor fidelity, with a facilitator checklist completed at each session. Impact and outcome evaluation will compare each participant's answers before the series, at its end and three months later, in a single group without controls. The survey will include a knowledge item, a five-item perceived susceptibility scale and self-reported weeknight sleep duration and wake-time regularity. Because the design has no comparison group and relies on self-report, results will be framed as participant change, not proof that the program caused it. Results will be shared with the health district and employers in August 2027.
Sustainability
If objectives are met, the health district will be asked to fold the workshop into its chronic disease prevention calendar, employers will be asked to fund their own on-site series, and trained volunteers from the first cohort will be recruited as co-facilitators to lower staffing costs in year two.
Revisions Since Earlier Drafts
Based on instructor feedback, the impact objective on beliefs now uses a defined scale, the budget adds childcare staffing that the marketing plan required, and the evaluation states its design limits.
References
Cappuccio, F. P., Cooper, D., D'Elia, L., Strazzullo, P., & Miller, M. A. (2011). Sleep duration predicts cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. European Heart Journal, 32(12), 1484-1492. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr007
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local data for better health, county data, 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/500-Cities-Places/PLACES-Local-Data-for-Better-Health-County-Data-20/swc5-untb
Grier, S., & Bryant, C. A. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610
Liu, Y., Wheaton, A. G., Chapman, D. P., Cunningham, T. J., Lu, H., & Croft, J. B. (2016). Prevalence of healthy sleep duration among adults: United States, 2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(6), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6506a1
Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Allen, N. B., Anderson, C. A. M., Black, T., Brewer, L. C., Foraker, R. E., Grandner, M. A., Lavretsky, H., Perak, A. M., Sharma, G., Rosamond, W., & American Heart Association. (2022). Life's Essential 8: Updating and enhancing the American Heart Association's construct of cardiovascular health: A presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 146(5), e18-e43. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078
Murawski, B., Wade, L., Plotnikoff, R. C., Lubans, D. R., & Duncan, M. J. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive and behavioral interventions to improve sleep health in adults without sleep disorders. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 40, 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.12.003
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep: SH-03. Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/sleep/increase-proportion-adults-who-get-enough-sleep-sh-03
Redeker, N. S., Caruso, C. C., Hashmi, S. D., Mullington, J. M., Grandner, M., & Morgenthaler, T. I. (2019). Workplace interventions to promote sleep health and an alert, healthy workforce. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 15(4), 649-657. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7734
Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403
Watson, N. F., Badr, M. S., Belenky, G., Bliwise, D. L., Buxton, O. M., Buysse, D., Dinges, D. F., Gangwisch, J., Grandner, M. A., Kushida, C., Malhotra, R. K., Martin, J. L., Patel, S. R., Quan, S. F., & Tasali, E. (2015). Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: A joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society. Sleep, 38(6), 843-844. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4716
What the HEP 454 Module 10 instructions ask for
Assignment 10 in HEP 454 is the final program plan, worth 150 points and the capstone of the course. You combine the earlier assignments, the community data, the problem, the mission and objectives, the intervention design, the budget, the timeline, the logic model, the social marketing plan and the rationale, into one document, and you revise each part using instructor feedback. The plan should also include an evaluation plan tied to each objective and a short account of how the program could continue. Follow the order and headings in the instructor's final plan template, keep figures consistent across sections and update any data that changed during the term. Leave time to proofread the whole document at once, since inconsistencies often appear only when the parts sit together.
Inside the HEP 454 Module 10 example
The sample opens with a short executive summary a funder could read alone. The need section draws the county, national and research data together with sources. Objectives appear in a table with the measure for each. Theory and activities are condensed from earlier work, and the marketing section summarizes segments and messages. The budget and timeline are tables, and the logic model appears as a single row table. The evaluation plan names its design and limits, and the paper ends with sustainability steps and a note on revisions made since earlier drafts. The objectives table includes a measure column that the evaluation plan then uses, and the budget total matches the cost quoted in the rationale.
Reading the HEP 454 Module 10 grading rubric
The final plan is worth 150 points, so it is graded on completeness and consistency as well as quality. Readers check that every required component is present and revised, that objectives, activities, budget and evaluation line up with each other, and that data and sources are current and cited. Common deductions include pasting earlier drafts without revision, budgets that do not match the activities, logic models that skip outputs, evaluation plans that measure things no objective names and missing references. Professional formatting and a clear executive summary make a strong first impression. Instructors also reward a plan that a real agency could pick up and run, with named partners, costs and dates.
HEP 454 Module 10 help from the desk
Start by listing every component and the feedback you received on it. Revise before you assemble. Use tables for objectives, budget, timeline and logic model. Make each number appear the same way everywhere. Match each objective to a measure in the evaluation plan. Write the executive summary last. Add a short revisions note if your instructor welcomes it. If assembling the plan feels overwhelming, the desk can help organize it section by section. Build a one-page checklist of every required section and tick each off as you revise. Check the budget against each activity and the logic model against the objectives. Hand the executive summary to a friend outside public health; if they cannot explain the program back to you, revise it.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HEP 454 and BS in Health Education and Health Promotion sample papers
- HEP 454 Module 1: Assignment 1: Exploring Local Health Outcomes
- HEP 454 Module 2: Assignment 2: Problem Identification
- HEP 454 Module 3: Assignment 3: Mission, Goals and Objectives
- HEP 454 Module 4: Assignment 4: Intervention Design
- HEP 454 Module 8: Assignment 8: Social Marketing Plan
- HEP 454 Module 9: Assignment 9: Program Rationale
- HEP 444 Module 1: Descriptive Epidemiology Case Study
- HEP 456 Module 1: Section 4: Background and Significance of the Health Problem
- HEP 386 Module 3: Module 3 Assignment: Literature Review Data Collection
- HEP 452 Module 6: Module 6 Assignment: Policy Brief Final Draft
HEP 454 Module 10 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HEP 454 Module 10 sample paper?
The complete Assignment 10 plan for Sleep for Your Heart Pinal, with budget, timeline and logic model, appears here.
What goes into the HEP 454 final program plan?
Every earlier assignment, revised, plus an executive summary, an evaluation plan and sustainability steps.
How much is the HEP 454 final plan worth?
It carries 150 of the course's 460 points.
Should the logic model be a diagram or a table?
Either works if the instructor allows it; the sample uses a table with inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes.
How do I show revisions in the final plan?
Revise each section using feedback and, if your instructor welcomes it, add a short note on what changed.