HEP 386 Module 5 Module 5 Assignment: SMART Objectives First Draft Example

Reviewed by Emmett Rockwell, MBA Arizona State University Updated October 2026

This HEP 386 Module 5 sample is the SMART Objectives First Draft from ASU's needs assessment course, a staple of Health Education and Health Promotion study. Worth 40 points, the ASU HEP 386 objectives draft asks students to turn what their assessment has found into measurable targets before presenting the assessment in Module 6. The composite student, who has assessed food insecurity among adults in Yuma County, summarizes the findings that drive the objectives, states a goal and drafts SMART objectives at process, impact and outcome levels for a response combining SNAP enrollment help at clinics, a produce prescription pilot and transportation to food sites. Each objective lists its baseline, data source and the finding behind it.

CourseHEP 386 Assessing Strengths and Needs for Health Education and Promotion
ModuleModule 5
Paper typeSMART objectives draft
LengthAbout 434 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolArizona State University
ProgramBS in Health Education and Health Promotion
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HEP 386 Module 5

1

From Findings to Targets: First-Draft SMART Objectives for Reducing Food Insecurity in Yuma County

Student Name

BS in Health Education and Health Promotion, Arizona State University

HEP 386: Assessing Strengths and Needs for Health Education and Promotion

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title shows the objectives grow out of the assessment findings.
2

From Findings to Targets: First-Draft SMART Objectives for Reducing Food Insecurity in Yuma County

Findings That Shape the Objectives

The literature shows food insecurity is linked to diet-sensitive chronic disease and that SNAP and produce prescriptions reduce it (Mabli & Ohls, 2015; Hager et al., 2023). County estimates show about one Yuma adult in four is food insecure, while about one in six reports receiving SNAP (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2025). My windshield survey found few full-service grocery stores outside the city of Yuma and long distances to food pantries in the county's smaller communities. In my interviews, a food bank coordinator said many eligible families do not apply for SNAP because of paperwork and immigration-related fears, and a farmworker mother said the family's groceries rarely last until payday.

Goal

Reduce food insecurity and its health effects among low-income adults in Yuma County by improving access to food assistance and fresh produce.

SMART Objectives

Process

P1. By June 30, 2027, train staff at two federally qualified health center sites in Yuma County to screen adult patients with the two-question Hunger Vital Sign and refer positive screens to a SNAP application assister. Baseline: no routine screening at the sites. Source: training logs.

P2. By December 31, 2027, enroll 300 food-insecure adults with diabetes or hypertension in a six-month produce prescription pilot. Baseline: no pilot. Source: enrollment records.

Impact

I1. By December 31, 2027, 60% of adults referred to a SNAP assister will submit a complete application within 30 days. Baseline: to be measured in the first quarter. Source: assister records.

I2. By the end of the six-month pilot, participants will increase fruit and vegetable intake by at least half a cup a day from enrollment. Baseline: enrollment survey. Source: pre and post survey.

Outcome

O1. By the end of the pilot, the proportion of participants who screen positive for food insecurity will fall by 25% from enrollment. Baseline: enrollment screening. Source: Hunger Vital Sign at enrollment and month six.

O2. By the end of the pilot, mean systolic blood pressure among participants with hypertension will fall by 5 mm Hg from enrollment. Baseline: clinic records. Source: electronic health record.

What this page is doingPairing each objective with a baseline and a data source is what turns a target into something an evaluator can test.
3

Fit with National Targets

Healthy People 2030 includes an objective to reduce household food insecurity and hunger, which these objectives would support at the local level (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion [ODPHP], n.d.).

Questions for Feedback

Is a 25% reduction realistic for a six-month pilot, given that a multisite evaluation reported roughly one-third lower odds of food insecurity? Should I add an objective for the transportation barrier my windshield survey found?

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local data for better health, county data, 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/500-Cities-Places/PLACES-Local-Data-for-Better-Health-County-Data-20/swc5-untb

Hager, K., Du, M., Li, Z., Mozaffarian, D., Chui, K., Shi, P., Ling, B., Cash, S. B., Folta, S. C., & Zhang, F. F. (2023). Impact of produce prescriptions on diet, food security, and cardiometabolic health outcomes: A multisite evaluation of 9 produce prescription programs in the United States. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 16(9), e009520. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009520

Mabli, J., & Ohls, J. (2015). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation is associated with an increase in household food security in a national evaluation. The Journal of Nutrition, 145(2), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.198697

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Reduce household food insecurity and hunger: NWS-01. Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/reduce-household-food-insecurity-and-hunger-nws-01

What the HEP 386 Module 5 instructions ask for

The SMART Objectives First Draft in HEP 386 Module 5 is worth 40 points. Using the findings from your literature review, windshield survey, interviews and volunteer work, draft SMART objectives for a health promotion response to your priority concern. The instructor's feedback on this draft prepares you for the Module 6 presentation, where the objectives appear as part of your assessment. State the goal first, then write objectives that a program could realistically meet and an evaluator could measure. Include process, impact and outcome objectives so your plan covers delivery, short-term change and longer-term results. Note the source of every baseline you use, too. Keep the list short.

How the HEP 386 Module 5 example is put together

The draft begins by recapping the findings behind each objective, drawing on the literature, county data, the windshield survey and two interviews. A one-sentence goal follows. Objectives are grouped as process, impact and outcome, and each names its population, target, amount and deadline, followed by a baseline and data source. A brief section ties the work to a national objective, and the draft ends with two questions for the instructor. Each objective names a realistic setting, such as two clinic sites, and the targets are drawn from what published programs achieved, which makes them easier to defend. The outcome objectives use measures the clinics already collect. Dates are concrete and consistent across objectives. Each target is realistic for a pilot.

Reading the HEP 386 Module 5 grading rubric

This draft carries 40 points. Readers check that each objective meets every SMART element, that objectives flow from the assessment findings, that they cover more than one level and that baselines and data sources are realistic. Marks drop when objectives describe activities rather than changes, when numbers or dates are missing, when targets are far beyond what a small program could achieve and when the link to the assessment is not shown. Strong drafts show the logic from finding to objective in a sentence or two and use validated measures, such as a recognized food insecurity screening tool, so the targets can be checked later. Questions to the instructor show readiness to revise.

HEP 386 Module 5 help: mistakes that cost marks

List your three strongest findings before writing any objective, and make sure each objective answers one of them. Write the who, what, how much and when for each. Name where the data will come from. Check your targets against what published programs achieved. Ask for feedback on anything you are unsure of. If your objectives keep turning into tasks, the desk can help reshape them. Read each objective aloud and ask whether someone outside the course would know exactly what success looks like. Keep the number of objectives manageable, six or fewer for a first draft. Save feedback for the presentation. Then revise and resubmit with care.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Request this one custom, free All HEP 386 module samples

More HEP 386 and BS in Health Education and Health Promotion sample papers

HEP 386 Module 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HEP 386 Module 5 sample paper?

This page holds the complete first draft of SMART objectives for a Yuma County food access response.

What does SMART stand for?

Five tests every objective should pass: is it specific, can it be measured, is it achievable, is it relevant and does it have a deadline?

What is the Hunger Vital Sign?

A two-question screening tool used in clinics to identify households at risk of food insecurity.

Should SMART objectives include a baseline?

Yes; a baseline shows where you start, so change can be measured.

How do SMART objectives connect to the HEP 386 assessment?

They turn the assessment's findings into targets presented in Module 6.