| Course | HCR 220 Introduction to Health Professions and the U.S. Health Care System |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Stakeholder mapping assignment |
| Length | About 504 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BS in Health Care Coordination |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCR 220 Module 1
Six Views of the Common Good: Mapping Stakeholder Priorities in U.S. Health Care
Student Name
BS in Health Care Coordination, Arizona State University
HCR 220: Introduction to Health Professions and the U.S. Health Care System
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Six Views of the Common Good: Mapping Stakeholder Priorities in U.S. Health Care
What "the Common Good" Means Here
In health care, the common good refers to conditions that benefit everyone, such as access to care when needed, safe and effective treatment and spending a society can sustain. Everyone in the system claims to serve it, but each stakeholder defines it through its own role and interests. Mapping those definitions shows why reform is difficult.
Six Stakeholders and Their Priorities
Government's attention to equity reflects evidence that health inequalities follow social conditions such as income, education and housing, which no single provider controls (Marmot, 2005).
| Stakeholder | What the common good means to them | Top priority |
|---|---|---|
| Patients and families | Care they can reach, afford and trust | Access and cost to them |
| Clinicians | Time and resources to give good care | Quality and professional autonomy |
| Hospitals and health systems | Financially stable institutions that serve communities | Revenue and capacity |
| Insurers | Coverage that is affordable and sustainable | Controlling costs and risk |
| Employers | A healthy, productive workforce at predictable cost | Premium growth |
| Government | Population health and fair use of public money | Spending, access and equity |
Where Priorities Align
All six stakeholders say they want better health at a sustainable cost. The Triple Aim framework expresses this shared goal as improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations and reducing per capita costs at the same time (Berwick et al., 2008). Prevention is a clear point of agreement: patients avoid illness, employers gain productivity, insurers and government pay for fewer hospital stays and clinicians see better outcomes.
Where Priorities Conflict
Conflicts appear when one stakeholder's revenue is another's cost. U.S. health spending sits well above that of other wealthy nations, and a cross-country comparison found that the difference is driven mainly by prices, including for labor, drugs and administration, rather than by greater use of care (Papanicolas et al., 2018). Higher prices are revenue for hospitals and clinicians and costs for patients, employers, insurers and government. Access is another fault line: government and patients want broader coverage, while insurers and employers worry about who pays for it.
| Issue | Aligned stakeholders | Opposed or cautious stakeholders |
|---|---|---|
| Lowering prices | Patients, employers, insurers, government | Hospitals, some clinicians |
| Expanding coverage | Patients, clinicians, government | Some employers and insurers, depending on cost |
| Investing in prevention | All six in principle | Disagreement over who pays |
Reflection: Why Multiple Perspectives Matter
Before this assignment, I thought of the health care system mostly from a patient's point of view, as something that is too expensive and hard to navigate. Mapping the stakeholders showed me that each group's position makes sense from where it stands. A hospital that resists price cuts is protecting jobs and services; an employer pushing back on premiums is protecting wages. Understanding these perspectives will help me as a future care coordinator, since my work will involve explaining insurers' rules to patients and patients' needs to clinicians and payers. The common good is not one stakeholder's definition; it is what emerges when their priorities are weighed together.
References
Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759-769. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759
Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71146-6
Papanicolas, I., Woskie, L. R., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Health care spending in the United States and other high-income countries. JAMA, 319(10), 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1150
HCR 220 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms
Mapping the Common Good is one of HCR 220's chapter assignments, which reinforce key course concepts such as stakeholder milestones, the role of U.S. government agencies and long-term care; the three in-class assignments are worth 20 points each of the course's 280. The posted description asks students to explore how different health care stakeholders view the common good, identify stakeholder values and priorities, map where those priorities align or differ and reflect on how considering multiple perspectives strengthens understanding of the U.S. system. All written work follows APA style with references. Use stakeholders named in the course textbook and include a reflection, since the description names it.
How this HCR 220 Module 1 example is built
Opening with a short definition of the common good, the sample builds a table setting out what each of six stakeholders means by it and what each prioritizes. Two sections then follow the mapping language of the prompt: one on where priorities align, using the Triple Aim as the shared goal, and one on where they conflict, using evidence on U.S. prices. A second table summarizes alignment and opposition on three issues. The reflection explains how the exercise changed the writer's view and why it matters for a future care coordinator. The structure mirrors the four verbs in the assignment: identify, map, compare and reflect. Short paragraphs keep the focus on comparison.
Where the marks sit in the HCR 220 Module 1 rubric
Chapter assignments are graded on their Canvas rubrics for 20 points. Stakeholder papers are typically credited for identifying a range of stakeholders accurately, stating each one's values and priorities rather than just naming it, a clear map or table of alignment and difference, evidence supporting at least one claim about conflict, a thoughtful reflection on perspective and APA formatting. Papers lose credit when stakeholders are described only by their function, when the paper argues for one stakeholder instead of mapping all of them and when the reflection is missing or generic. Clear tables, short paragraphs and consistent stakeholder names make the map easy to grade. Balance earns credit too.
HCR 220 Module 1 help: mistakes that cost marks
Begin by listing stakeholders from your textbook chapter, then write one sentence for each on what they would call the common good. A simple table makes alignment and conflict easy to see. Choose two or three issues to map rather than many. Be fair to stakeholders you disagree with. Keep the reflection personal and specific. The desk can help you check that your map covers the stakeholders your instructor expects. If your chapter names different stakeholders, such as pharmaceutical companies or public health agencies, map those instead; what matters is showing each group's view of the common good and where it meets the others. Close with a reflection that names something you now understand differently.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HCR 220 and BS in Health Care Coordination sample papers
- HCR 220 Module 2: Career Exploration
- HCR 220 Module 3: Healthcare Technology Infographic
- HCR 400 Module 1: Critical Appraisal: Intervention Study
- HCR 426 Module 1: Annotated Bibliography on a Care Coordination Issue
- HCR 321 Module 4: Module 4 Short Paper: Evaluating Care Coordination
- HCR 406 Module 3: Campaign Material
HCR 220 Module 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HCR 220 Module 1 sample paper?
This page has a full HCR 220 Module 1 sample: a stakeholder map of how six groups view the common good in U.S. health care.
Who are the main stakeholders in U.S. health care?
Patients, clinicians, hospitals and health systems, insurers, employers and government are the stakeholders most courses map.
What is the Triple Aim?
A 2008 proposal by Berwick and colleagues to pursue three goals at once: care patients rate well, a healthier population and lower spending per head.
Why does the U.S. spend more on health care?
A comparison with other high-income countries found the difference driven mainly by higher prices rather than greater use of care.
How much is the HCR 220 common good assignment worth?
It is one of three 20-point in-class assignments in a course worth 280 points.