| Course | SWG 623 Program Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Logic model assignment |
| Length | About 511 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Master of Social Work |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for SWG 623 Module 2
Strong Roots: A Logic Model for a Family-Strengthening Program
Student Name
Master of Social Work, Arizona State University
SWG 623: Program Evaluation
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Strong Roots: A Logic Model for a Family-Strengthening Program
The Program (Illustrative)
Strong Roots is a program at a Phoenix family center for parents of children ages 3 to 12 who have been referred by schools, clinics or child welfare for family stress. It combines an eight-week bilingual parenting group, monthly home visits, help connecting families to basic resources and quarterly family nights. Its goal is to strengthen protective factors that reduce the risk of child maltreatment.
Logic Model
| Box | Entries |
|---|---|
| Inputs and resources | Two bilingual family support specialists (2.0 FTE); a licensed clinical social work supervisor (0.25 FTE); a $185,000 annual grant from a community foundation; a group room, childcare space and a van at the family center; an evidence-informed parenting curriculum in English and Spanish |
| Activities | Recruit families through school counselors and pediatric clinics; deliver eight weekly two-hour parenting groups each quarter; conduct monthly home visits to set and review family goals; screen families for basic needs and link them to food, housing and utility help; hold quarterly family nights with shared meals and activities |
| Outputs | 120 families enrolled per year; 15 parenting group cycles completed per year; 600 home visits completed per year; 240 resource referrals made, with follow-up on each; four family nights held per year with at least 50 attendees each |
| Outcomes (short- and intermediate-term) | Parents report increased knowledge of child development; parents report more social support; parents report less parenting stress; families report fewer unmet basic needs; parents use positive discipline strategies more often |
| Impact (long-term) | Fewer substantiated reports of child maltreatment among participating families; more stable family housing; improved child well-being at school; stronger family and community connections in the neighborhoods served |
The Logic Behind the Model
A logic model sketches a program's theory on one page, tracing a line from what it invests and does to what it hopes will change (W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 2004). Read from left to right, Strong Roots works as a chain of if-then statements: if the center has trained bilingual staff, funding and space, then it can run groups, home visits and resource links; if those activities reach enough families, then parents gain knowledge, support and relief from basic needs; and if those protective factors grow, then the risk of maltreatment falls over time.
Writing outcomes that can be measured is essential for later evaluation. Following the CDC's guidance on SMART objectives, each outcome can be turned into a specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound statement, for example: by the end of the eight-week group, 70% of parents will report a reduction in parenting stress (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018).
What the Model Takes for Granted
Strong Roots counts on the idea that parents can attend evening groups, that childcare and transportation remove the main barriers and that the curriculum works for both English- and Spanish-speaking families. External factors, such as housing costs and changes in public benefits, could limit the program's impact regardless of how well it runs, which is why the impact box describes contribution rather than sole cause (Grinnell et al., 2019).
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Writing SMART objectives (Evaluation Brief No. 3b). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief3b.pdf
Grinnell, R. M., Jr., Gabor, P. A., & Unrau, Y. A. (2019). Program evaluation for social workers: Foundations of evidence-based programs (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
Reading the SWG 623 Module 2 assignment instructions
SWG 623's 30-point Logic Model Assignment closes Week 2, Module 2, Program Design. Read the case scenario posted in Canvas and complete a basic logic model using the course's Logic Model Template. Document the inputs or resources, the processes, meaning activities and outputs, and the expected outcomes and impact described in the scenario, organizing each into the correct box. Enter at least four items in each of the five boxes. Each entry is worth 1.5 points, and unclear or poorly written entries receive no points, so write each entry as a specific, complete phrase. Module 2 readings include textbook chapters 7 to 9 and the CDC brief on writing SMART objectives.
How the SWG 623 Module 2 example is put together
The sample states that its program is illustrative, then describes it briefly so the logic model can be judged against it. The model fills all five boxes with at least four entries each, and every entry is specific: staff are counted in full-time equivalents, outputs have annual numbers and outcomes describe changes in parents rather than activities. A short narrative explains the if-then chain using a foundational guide, converts one outcome into a SMART objective and names assumptions and external factors. Margin notes explain why specificity and measurable outcomes matter for both the rubric and the later evaluation plan. The program is invented for illustration because the course's case is posted only in Canvas.
Where the marks sit in the SWG 623 Module 2 rubric
Graders award 1.5 points for each clear entry, up to four per box across five boxes, so precision is rewarded directly. Entries lose points when they are vague, such as "staff" instead of the number and type of staff, when activities are listed as outputs or outcomes, when outcomes describe what the program does rather than how participants change or when an entry does not come from the case scenario. A frequent error is placing counts of services in the outcomes box; counts belong in outputs. Organizing entries in the template's order and writing complete, readable phrases protects every available point. Writing entries in parallel form, each beginning with a noun or verb, also makes the model easier to score.
SWG 623 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
Read the case scenario twice and highlight every resource, action and intended change. Sort each highlight into inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes or impact. Make outputs countable and outcomes describe change in participants. Check that each box has at least four entries. Read the model left to right as if-then statements to test the logic. Convert one outcome into a SMART objective to check that it is measurable. If an item could fit two boxes, the desk can help you decide. Keep each entry to one clear phrase. Have a classmate read your model aloud from left to right and point out any jump in the logic. Fix gaps before you submit.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More SWG 623 and Master of Social Work sample papers
- SWG 623 Module 6: Written Evaluation Plan: Measuring Whether a Family Program Strengthens Protective Factors
- SWG 632 Module 8: Policy Analysis Paper: The Housing Choice Voucher Program Through Gilbert and Terrell
- SWG 571 Module 12: Intervention and Treatment Plan Paper: Three Interventions for a Widowed Older Man
- SWG 573 Module 3: Advocacy Project Reflection: Asking a Legislator to Protect Home-Delivered Meals
SWG 623 Module 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free SWG 623 Module 2 sample paper?
The full logic model for an illustrative family-strengthening program is on this page.
What boxes does the SWG 623 logic model include?
Inputs or resources, activities, outputs, outcomes and impact.
How is the SWG 623 logic model graded?
At 1.5 points per clear entry, with at least four entries in each of five boxes.
What is the difference between outputs and outcomes?
Outputs count what the program delivers; outcomes describe how participants change.
What are SMART objectives?
Objectives written so they can be checked: specific, measurable, within reach, relevant and tied to a deadline.