| Course | SWG 573 Policies to Promote Healthy Aging |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Interview reflection paper |
| Length | About 657 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | Master of Social Work |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for SWG 573 Module 6
Working Her Whole Life and Still Doing the Math: An Interview on Aging Policy
Student Name
Master of Social Work, Arizona State University
SWG 573: Policies to Promote Healthy Aging
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Working Her Whole Life and Still Doing the Math: An Interview on Aging Policy
Introduction
I interviewed Mrs. Dorothy Hayes, 74, a retired elementary school teacher who has lived in south Phoenix for 40 years. She is a Black woman and a widow, while I am a white, male student in my twenties. We spoke for an hour at her kitchen table, and she agreed to let me use her story with a pseudonym. I asked about the challenges of aging, her views of public programs, her service needs, cultural influences on her care and what services she knows about.
Key Questions and Responses
Asked about challenges, Mrs. Hayes named money first. Her husband's death cut household income, and although she taught for 31 years, she said she is "still doing the math every month." Her arthritis makes the bus difficult, and she stopped driving last year.
Asked about public programs, she called Social Security and Medicare "what keeps me in this house," but said her Medicare plan's out-of-pocket costs for her knee injections were a surprise. She had never heard of the Medicare Savings Programs, which help people with limited incomes pay Medicare costs.
Asked about service needs, she listed transportation to appointments, help with yard work and someone to check on her during summer heat waves.
Asked about culture, she described her church as her main support and said she trusts information from her pastor more than from government offices. She recalled being treated dismissively by a clinic in the past and said she prefers a Black physician when possible.
Asked about awareness of services, she knew about senior centers but not the local Area Agency on Aging, the hub for Older Americans Act services in her county.
Connecting Her Experiences to Policy
Her money worries fit a national gap: older women's median income trails older men's by about $12,800 a year, according to federal figures for 2022 (Administration for Community Living, 2024). Social Security matters even more for those without large savings or pensions. Her surprise at medical costs points to gaps in Medicare coverage, and her lack of awareness of the Medicare Savings Programs reflects a known problem: many eligible older adults do not enroll in benefits they qualify for. Her need for transportation and heat checks matches services the Older Americans Act funds through Area Agencies on Aging, yet she did not know where to start.
Theory: Cumulative Advantage and Disadvantage
Dannefer (2003) describes cumulative advantage and disadvantage as the tendency for initial differences between people to grow over the life course through social processes, so that inequality in later life reflects decades of unequal opportunity. Mrs. Hayes earned a teacher's salary, but she described a career that began in segregated schools, years of lower pay than white colleagues and a neighborhood where home values grew slowly. Her current financial strain is the end point of those processes, not a personal failure. Her distrust of some health providers also has roots in experiences of discrimination, which makes trusted messengers, like her pastor, central to outreach.
Needed Policy and Program Changes
First, benefit enrollment should be simplified and actively offered; screening older adults for the Medicare Savings Programs at Social Security offices and clinics would reach people like Mrs. Hayes. Second, Area Agencies on Aging should partner with Black churches to share information through trusted leaders. Third, funding for transportation and heat-related wellness checks under the Older Americans Act should expand as Arizona's summers grow hotter.
Reflection
I expected to hear about health problems. Instead, I heard about money, trust and information. As a future social worker, I will ask clients what benefits they already receive and screen them for the rest, and I will remember that the source of information can matter as much as its accuracy. Helping clients reach the resources they are entitled to is a core duty in the NASW Code of Ethics (National Association of Social Workers, 2021).
References
Administration for Community Living. (2024). 2023 profile of older Americans. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 58(6), S327-S337. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Reading the SWG 573 Module 6 assignment instructions
Due as Week 6 (Module 6, life policies) ends, the SWG 573 Interview and Analysis carries 20 points. Interview an adult age 65 or older who differs from you in at least one key social identity, such as gender, race, country of origin or religion. Drawing on course concepts, ask about the challenges of aging, perceptions of public programs and policies that support healthy aging, specific service needs, cultural influences on access to care and awareness of available services. Then write a critically reflective paper that introduces the interviewee with a pseudonym, summarizes key questions and responses, connects the experiences to policies and programs, identifies needed changes and integrates course theories and research. Use a pseudonym and remove identifying details.
How the SWG 573 Module 6 example is put together
Mrs. Hayes appears under a pseudonym, and the opening states plainly how her identities differ from the interviewer's. The summary follows the five required topics in order, using short quotations. The policy section links each concern to a program or national figure. A theory section applies cumulative advantage and disadvantage in depth, using details from the interview. Recommendations are specific and tied to what the interviewee said. A brief reflection names what surprised the student and how it will change practice. Margin notes explain how the structure meets the prompt. The interviewee is a composite, and details are changed to protect privacy. The theory section draws only on details the interviewee actually shared.
SWG 573 Module 6 rubric: what earns full marks
Instructors grading the interview paper look for coverage of all five topic areas, a clear connection between the interviewee's experiences and specific policies or programs, recommendations for change grounded in those experiences and genuine integration of course theory and research. Marks fall for papers that retell the conversation without analyzing it, when policies are named vaguely, when theory is mentioned only in passing or when the interviewee's privacy is not protected. Cultural humility in how the interviewee is described also matters. Critical reflection on the student's own assumptions strengthens the paper and reflects the assignment's purpose. Short quotations used as evidence usually earn more credit than long paraphrase. Recommendations that grow directly out of the interview show strong analysis.
SWG 573 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks
Choose an interviewee who differs from you in a meaningful identity. Prepare questions for each of the five required topics. Ask for examples, not just opinions. Take careful notes and ask permission before quoting. Match each concern to a specific program or policy. Pick one course theory and apply it with details from the interview. Recommend changes that would have helped this person. If the policy connections feel unclear, the desk can help you map them. Thank your interviewee and use a pseudonym. Write up your notes within a day of the interview, while the details are clear. Ask permission before quoting.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More SWG 573 and Master of Social Work sample papers
- SWG 573 Module 3: Advocacy Project Reflection: Asking a Legislator to Protect Home-Delivered Meals
- SWG 573 Module 7: Policy Paper: Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization and Older Adults' Access to Care
- SWG 571 Module 7: Assessment Paper: Late-Life Depression, Grief and Drinking in a Recently Widowed Man
- SWG 632 Module 2: Field Placement Ethical Dilemma Case Study: A Sobriety Rule at a Shelter
- SWG 623 Module 6: Written Evaluation Plan: Measuring Whether a Family Program Strengthens Protective Factors
SWG 573 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free SWG 573 Module 6 sample paper?
The full interview and analysis paper on an older adult's experience of aging policy is on this page.
Who should I interview for SWG 573?
An adult 65 or older who differs from you in at least one key social identity.
What topics does the SWG 573 interview cover?
Challenges of aging, public programs, service needs, cultural influences on care and awareness of services.
What is cumulative advantage and disadvantage theory?
The idea that early differences between people grow over the life course, shaping inequality in later life.
What do Area Agencies on Aging do?
They coordinate Older Americans Act services such as meals, transportation and caregiver support in each region.