| Course | NUR 553 Dynamics of Professional Nursing II |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Discussion board post (political platform) and peer responses |
| Length | About 504 words |
| Format | Discussion post with APA 7 citations |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | MS in Nursing |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 553 Module 6
Health Policy Platform: Representative for District 7, the Heart Recovery at Home Act
The Heart Recovery at Home Act: A Nurse Legislator's Platform for Covering Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation
Platform
I am a registered nurse who has spent nine years caring for patients after heart attacks, stents and heart surgery, and I ran for the state House because I watched too many of them go home and never return for the rehabilitation that could keep them out of the hospital.
The issue. After a heart attack, stent or heart surgery, cardiac rehabilitation offers supervised exercise, teaching and risk-factor work over several weeks. It works: a large meta-analysis of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation found that it reduced cardiovascular mortality and hospital admissions compared with usual care (Anderson et al., 2016). Yet most eligible patients never attend. Of roughly 366,000 Medicare beneficiaries who qualified, only about a quarter participated in any rehabilitation (Ritchey et al., 2020). In rural parts of our state, the nearest program may be more than an hour's drive away, three times a week, for twelve weeks.
The policy. The Heart Recovery at Home Act would:
1. Require our state's Medicaid program to cover home-based and virtual cardiac rehabilitation, delivered by licensed programs, at the same level as center-based sessions.
2. Fund a two-year pilot of loaned home equipment, such as blood pressure monitors and activity trackers, for rural enrollees.
3. Require hospitals to document a rehabilitation referral, or the reason none was made, at discharge for every eligible patient.
Why home-based care. A scientific statement from national cardiology organizations judged home-based programs a reasonable choice for carefully selected patients at low or moderate risk who cannot get to a center (Thomas et al., 2019). That makes it a practical way to reach rural and working patients.
Cost thinking. Covering home sessions costs money, but hospital readmissions cost more. I would ask the state's Medicaid agency to report rehabilitation participation and readmissions for two years so the legislature can judge the return.
Partners. Cardiology and rehabilitation programs, rural hospitals, the state nurses association, patient advocacy groups and tribal health programs.
My promise as a nurse legislator: every patient who survives a heart attack in our state should have a real path to recovery, whether they live near a hospital or two hours from one.
Peer Response 1 (To Keisha's Platform on School Nurses)
1. Effectiveness: Yes. Your opening statistic on how many schools share one nurse made the importance immediately clear, and your policy, state matching funds tied to a nurse-to-student ratio, was specific.
2. Strengths and improvements: Your story about a student with asthma was the strongest part. Next time, I would add an estimate of cost and how it would be funded, since legislators will ask first.
Peer Response 2 (To Rob's Platform on Insulin Costs)
1. Effectiveness: Partly. The issue came through clearly, but I was not sure whether you were proposing a state cap or a federal one.
2. Strengths and improvements: Your list of partners was thorough. Naming the bill's exact mechanism in one sentence near the top would make the platform stronger.
References
Anderson, L., Oldridge, N., Thompson, D. R., Zwisler, A.-D., Rees, K., Martin, N., & Taylor, R. S. (2016). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044
Ritchey, M. D., Maresh, S., McNeely, J., Shaffer, T., Jackson, S. L., Keteyian, S. J., Brawner, C. A., Whooley, M. A., Chang, T., Stolp, H., Schieb, L., & Wright, J. (2020). Tracking cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion among Medicare beneficiaries to inform the efforts of a national initiative. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 13(1), Article e005902. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005902
Thomas, R. J., Beatty, A. L., Beckie, T. M., Brewer, L. C., Brown, T. M., Forman, D. E., Franklin, B. A., Keteyian, S. J., Kitzman, D. W., Regensteiner, J. G., Sanderson, B. K., & Whooley, M. A. (2019). Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: A scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation, 140(1), e69-e89. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000663
Reading the NUR 553 Module 6 assignment instructions
Week 6 turns to health policy and advocacy. Before posting, students listen to two required podcasts from Johnson and Johnson and at least one of their own choosing. The discussion board then asks you to imagine you have recently been elected to the federal House or your state legislature and to develop your political platform on a health care issue. Two peer responses are required, each answering two questions: was the platform format effective in demonstrating the importance of the health issue and the proposed policy, and what part was exceptionally well done and what could be improved next time. At 25 points, the board outweighs every other item in the course.
How the NUR 553 Module 6 example is put together
Written in the first person as a newly elected legislator, the platform opens with the writer's nursing background as her reason for running. The issue section explains cardiac rehabilitation and supports its importance with a meta-analysis and Medicare participation data. A numbered three-part policy follows, written so it could become a bill, then a paragraph on why home-based care fits, citing a national scientific statement. Short sections on cost and partners and a one-sentence promise close the platform. Two peer responses each answer the syllabus's two questions in order, with one specific strength and one specific improvement. Three sources support the post.
Where the marks sit in the NUR 553 Module 6 rubric
As the largest item at 25 points, the platform is likely graded on a clearly identified health issue, evidence of its importance, a specific proposed policy, a persuasive platform format and two peer responses that answer the required questions. Platforms earn most when the policy is concrete enough to imagine as legislation, rather than a general wish to "improve access." Evidence that quantifies the problem strengthens the case. Addressing cost and partners shows political awareness, because a bill without a budget line or allies rarely leaves committee. Peer responses should answer both questions directly, naming a strength and an improvement, which makes them useful to classmates. Professional tone and accurate citations count in a policy context.
NUR 553 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks
A common weakness is a platform that describes a problem at length and proposes something vague. State what the law would do in one sentence. Another is ignoring cost; legislators always ask. Choose an issue within the power of the office you imagine; a state legislator cannot change federal Medicare rules directly. If you tell the desk which issue you care about and which office you imagine, a platform can be drafted around it. Make peer responses specific by quoting a line from the classmate's platform. Listen to the required podcasts first, since faculty may expect a reference to them, and note one idea from the podcast you chose yourself. A platform that names who would oppose it, and why, is far more persuasive than one that assumes agreement.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 553 and MS in Nursing sample papers
- NUR 553 Module 1: Critical Analysis Essay: A Fifth Element for the Nursing Metaparadigm
- NUR 553 Module 2: Paper: Clinical Judgment Scenario Using Tanner's Model
- NUR 553 Module 3: EBP Assignment: Appraising a Quantitative Nursing Research Study
- NUR 553 Module 4: Planning a Quantitative Research Study: Mini Research Proposal
- NUR 553 Module 5: EBP Steps 1-3: PICO(T) Question Worksheet
- NUR 553 Module 7: Integration and Application of Concepts Worksheet
- NUR 501 Module 5: Strategies for Innovation Discussion
- NUR 521 Module 7: Integrating Informatics and Health Care Final Project
- NUR 502 Module 2: Health Policy and Vulnerable Populations Discussion
- NUR 673 Module 5: Assessment Portfolio, Part 2: Final Test Questions
NUR 553 Module 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NUR 553 Module 6 sample paper?
The NUR 553 health policy platform sample above proposes a Heart Recovery at Home Act and includes two structured peer responses.
What does the NUR 553 health policy discussion ask?
Imagine being elected to Congress or your state legislature, develop a political platform on a health issue and give two peer responses.
How many points is the NUR 553 policy platform worth?
The posted syllabus lists the health policy platform discussion with peer responses at 25 of 100 points.
Does cardiac rehabilitation reduce hospital admissions?
A large meta-analysis found exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduced cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions compared with usual care.
What should peer responses on a policy platform cover?
Whether the format showed the issue's importance and the policy, and what was done well and what could be improved.