| Course | MED 475 Palliative Care Managing Complex Serious Illness |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Case study analysis |
| Length | About 510 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BS in Medical Studies |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MED 475 Module 4
When the Family Disagrees: A Palliative Care Case Study
Student Name
BS in Medical Studies, Arizona State University
MED 475: Palliative Care: Managing Complex Serious Illness
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
When the Family Disagrees: A Palliative Care Case Study
The Case (Illustrative)
Mr. Robert Hale, 84, has advanced COPD and moderate-to-severe dementia and lives with his daughter Karen, who has cared for him for three years. After his third hospitalization for pneumonia this year, he eats little and has lost weight. His son, David, who lives out of state, wants a feeding tube and full treatment. Karen believes their father would not want that. A third child, Lisa, is undecided. Mr. Hale completed a living will ten years ago but did not name a health care agent.
What Is Driving the Conflict?
Family conflict at the end of life is common and predictable. In a statewide survey of spouses and adult children of people who died of lung cancer, prior family conflict, communication constraints and family members asserting control were significant predictors of conflict (Kramer et al., 2010). In this case, David's distance limits his information about his father's decline, Karen's caregiving strain affects how she communicates and the absence of a named agent leaves no clear decision maker. Guilt and grief may also shape David's wish to "do everything."
What Did the Patient Want?
The living will states that Mr. Hale would not want artificial nutrition or life support if he had an irreversible condition and could not communicate. His pastor recalls him saying he "never wanted to end up like his brother," who lived for years on a feeding tube. These sources point toward comfort-focused care. In advanced dementia, eating problems develop in most patients, and tube feeding is one of the burdensome interventions that proxies who understand the prognosis tend to avoid (Mitchell et al., 2009). Substituted judgment asks the children to choose what their father would choose, setting aside what they would want for themselves.
Plan for a Family Meeting
Communication guidance suggests asking before telling, responding to emotion and avoiding jargon in these meetings (Back et al., 2005). Acknowledging David's love and worry, rather than arguing with him, is more likely to reduce conflict.
| Step | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Invite all three children, by video for David | Equal access to information |
| Ask each child what they understand about their father's condition | Identify gaps |
| Share the prognosis and expected course plainly | Correct misunderstanding |
| Read the living will together and share the pastor's recollection | Center the patient's voice |
| Discuss options, including comfort feeding by hand and a hospice referral | Offer concrete alternatives |
| Name a point person for decisions and agree on the next steps | Reduce future conflict |
Supporting the Caregiver
Karen shows signs of caregiver strain: she is sleeping poorly and has missed work. A respite plan, such as short-term respite through hospice or in-home aide hours, would protect her health and her ability to continue caregiving. Respite is a recognized part of hospice and palliative support for families.
Conclusion
The conflict reflects distance, strain and unclear authority more than disagreement about the facts. Centering Mr. Hale's documented wishes, communicating clearly with all three children and supporting Karen offer the best path to a decision the family can live with.
References
Back, A. L., Arnold, R. M., Baile, W. F., Tulsky, J. A., & Fryer-Edwards, K. (2005). Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55(3), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164
Kramer, B. J., Kavanaugh, M., Trentham-Dietz, A., Walsh, M., & Yonker, J. A. (2010). Predictors of family conflict at the end of life: The experience of spouses and adult children of persons with lung cancer. The Gerontologist, 50(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp121
Mitchell, S. L., Teno, J. M., Kiely, D. K., Shaffer, M. L., Jones, R. N., Prigerson, H. G., Volicer, L., Givens, J. L., & Hamel, M. B. (2009). The clinical course of advanced dementia. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(16), 1529-1538. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0902234
What the MED 475 Module 4 instructions ask for
The Module 4 case study is the first of three 20-point case study assignments in MED 475, set in the module on family conflict, pediatric palliative care and respite care. You will find the patient details and questions in Canvas. Read the case closely and apply the module's readings: identify what is driving any conflict, what the patient's own wishes are and how the care team should respond. Plans for communication and for supporting caregivers are often central. Back your analysis with module readings and research, giving every case question a heading of its own. Treat every family member's view with respect in your analysis, since each usually reflects love and worry. Use headings that match the case questions.
How this MED 475 Module 4 example is built
The sample summarizes the illustrative case in one paragraph, then answers the key questions under clear headings. The conflict section uses survey research to name specific predictors present in the case. The patient-wishes section distinguishes the living will and a third-party recollection and explains substituted judgment. The family meeting appears as a table of steps, each paired with its aim. A short section addresses caregiver strain and respite. The analysis also draws on research about advanced dementia's course to explain why comfort feeding is a reasonable alternative. The plan is practical enough for a social worker or nurse to run the meeting as written. Sources link each part of the plan to evidence.
MED 475 Module 4 rubric: what earns full marks
Graders scoring this case study look for accurate identification of the issues in the case, use of module concepts and research, attention to the patient's wishes and a practical, compassionate plan. Analyses lose points when they take sides in the family dispute, ignore the patient's documented wishes, propose plans without explaining the reasoning or overlook the caregiver. Citing research on family conflict and on communication in serious illness strengthens the analysis. Organizing the answer around the case questions makes it easier to grade. Plans that name who will lead the meeting and what happens afterward show strong practical judgment. Citing research on family conflict and on dementia's course strengthens the argument considerably. Plans that protect the caregiver earn credit.
MED 475 Module 4 help from the desk
List each family member and what they want before writing. Separate facts in the case from assumptions. Find the patient's own voice in documents or reported statements. Plan the family meeting step by step. Include support for the caregiver. Cite at least two sources from the module. If the case questions overlap, the desk can help you organize the answer. Keep your tone neutral toward family members. Draft the family meeting agenda as a numbered list before writing prose. Check that the patient's documented wishes appear early in the plan. Note the caregiver's needs separately so they are not lost.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MED 475 and BS in Medical Studies sample papers
- MED 475 Module 3: Communicating an Advance Directive: A Script for Talking With a Patient Who Has Dementia
- MED 475 Module 5: International Palliative Care Presentation: Kerala's Neighborhood Network
- MED 475 Module 6: Case Study: Spiritual Distress and Behavioral Health in Serious Illness
- MED 475 Module 7: Case Study: Palliative Care or Hospice? Deciding What Fits a Patient Now
- MED 300 Module 6: Final Paper: Why Is It So Hard to Stop Treatment?
- MED 320 Module 6: Part 4: Final Ethical Analysis Paper
MED 475 Module 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MED 475 Module 4 sample paper?
The full family conflict palliative care case study is on this page.
What does the MED 475 Module 4 module cover?
Family conflict, pediatric palliative care and respite care.
What predicts family conflict at the end of life?
Prior conflict, communication constraints and family members asserting control, in one survey.
What is substituted judgment?
Choosing what the patient would most likely choose, guided by what is known of their wishes and values.
What is respite care?
Short-term care that gives family caregivers a break.