MED 320 Module 2 Part 2: Ethical Analysis Outline Example

Free sample paper for MED 320 Module 2

Reading the MED 320 Module 2 assignment instructions

Part 2 of the MED 320 ethical analysis is the outline, worth 20 points and due in Module 2, after you select a current ethical event in Part 1. The outline lays out the structure of the analysis that you will draft in Part 3 and finish in Part 4, so it should show the event, the stakeholders, the ethical principles and theories you will apply, the counterarguments you will address and your tentative conclusion. The course asks you to evaluate the event based on health-related ethical foundations and theories, so name them explicitly. Follow the outline format your instructor posts in Canvas, and plan your sources now so the draft goes faster. An outline this detailed makes the draft in Module 4 much faster to write.

How this MED 320 Module 2 example is built

The sample uses roman numerals for the main sections and letters for points beneath them. The introduction states the event and a tentative thesis. Background and stakeholder sections set up the analysis, which is organized around the four principles of biomedical ethics and two theories. Counterarguments and responses are listed separately, and a small table at the end matches planned sources to sections. Each principle in the analysis section is phrased as a question about the event, which turns a list of principles into a plan for argument, and the counterarguments are paired with planned responses so the draft can move quickly.

Reading the MED 320 Module 2 grading rubric

Scoring the 20-point outline, instructors confirm that the event is current and clearly described, that the thesis is arguable, that ethical principles and theories are named and applied to specific questions, that stakeholders are identified and that counterarguments are anticipated. Marks drop when the outline is too thin to guide a paper, when it summarizes the event without an ethical framework, when counterarguments are missing and when sources are not yet identified. Graders also value outlines that show balance, planning to address objections such as animal welfare or public risk, and that use parallel structure so the instructor can see how each part will become a section of the paper. Clear sourcing counts too.

MED 320 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

Make the thesis contestable, a position a fair reader might reject. List every group affected by the event. For each ethical principle, write one question the event raises. Add one theory beyond the principles. Note at least two counterarguments. Find two or three sources before submitting so the outline is grounded. Has your event grown too large to handle? Our desk can help trim it. Keep each outline point to a phrase or short sentence. Check that every section of the outline has at least one planned source. Use the instructor's feedback on your topic selection before finalizing the thesis. Then submit on time.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More MED 320 and BS in Medical Studies sample papers

• MED 320 Module 6: Part 4: Final Ethical Analysis Paper
• MED 475 Module 3: Communicating an Advance Directive: A Script for Talking With a Patient Who Has Dementia
• MED 300 Module 6: Final Paper: Why Is It So Hard to Stop Treatment?

MED 320 Module 2 questions, answered