| Course | HCD 332 Population Health Policy and Legislation |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Recorded presentation slides with speaker notes |
| Length | About 355 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 slide deck with speaker notes |
| School | Arizona State University |
| Program | BS in Health Care Administration and Policy |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCD 332 Module 3
A Briefing for the Health Director: Presenting the Case for Putting Naloxone Within Reach
Student Name
BS in Health Care Administration and Policy, Arizona State University
HCD 332: Population Health Policy and Legislation
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Slide 1: The Decision Question
Should the state put free naloxone in the hands of people most likely to witness an overdose?
Speaker notes: Director, I am here to recommend a way to prevent overdose deaths in our state at modest cost.
Slide 2: The Problem
Overdose deaths, driven by fentanyl, remain a leading cause of death among younger adults; most happen at home, with friends or family nearby.
Speaker notes: The people who find someone overdosing are usually not clinicians. They are the ones who need naloxone.
Slide 3: What Naloxone Does
Reverses an opioid overdose within minutes; safe for laypeople to give as a nasal spray.
Slide 4: The Evidence
Where trained laypeople carried naloxone, fewer people died of overdose, and a causal review supports the link.
Speaker notes: In Massachusetts, communities that implemented distribution had lower overdose death rates than those that did not (Walley et al., 2013), and a review applying causal criteria supports the programs' effectiveness (McDonald & Strang, 2016). This structure follows the course text's model of analysis (Teitelbaum & Wilensky, 2020).
Slide 5: Why a Gap Remains
Over-the-counter naloxone removed the prescription barrier but not the cost; people leaving jail or treatment rarely leave with it.
Slide 6: Who Cares and Why
Families and harm reduction groups support expansion; pharmacists want clear rules and payment; law enforcement and legislators are divided.
Slide 7: Three Options
Community distribution; no-cost pharmacy access under a standing order; naloxone at release from jail and treatment.
Slide 8: How the Options Compare
A table rates each option on effectiveness, cost, feasibility and equity, with community distribution and release programs rated highest.
Speaker notes: I applied the same four criteria to each option so the comparison is fair.
Slide 9: Recommendation
Fund community distribution and naloxone at release now, using opioid settlement funds; add pharmacy no-cost access when funding allows.
Slide 10: Next Steps and Measures
Bulk purchase; highest-burden counties first; agreements with facilities within six months; track kits, reversals and overdose deaths for two years.
Speaker notes: With your approval, we can begin distribution within one quarter. Thank you.
References
McDonald, R., & Strang, J. (2016). Are take-home naloxone programmes effective? Systematic review utilizing application of the Bradford Hill criteria. Addiction, 111(7), 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13326
Teitelbaum, J. B., & Wilensky, S. E. (2020). Essentials of health policy and law (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Walley, A. Y., Xuan, Z., Hackman, H. H., Quinn, E., Doe-Simkins, M., Sorensen-Alawad, A., Ruiz, S., & Ozonoff, A. (2013). Opioid overdose rates and implementation of overdose education and nasal naloxone distribution in Massachusetts: Interrupted time series analysis. BMJ, 346, Article f174. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f174
HCD 332 Module 3 instructions, in plain terms
The recorded presentation is the final piece of HCD 332's policy analysis project, worth 25 points and due in Week 6 with the final written analysis. The syllabus asks students to record themselves presenting their Health Policy Analysis and to submit an mp4 video for grading. The video should present the analysis rather than read it: the decision question, the essential background and evidence, the stakeholders, the options and how they compare, and the recommendation with next steps. Check Canvas for any time limit and technical requirements before recording, and practice once so the recording sounds like a briefing to a real decision maker rather than a reading of the memo. Keep the slide count modest, since a briefing should leave time for the recommendation and next steps.
Inside the HCD 332 Module 3 example
Ten slides carry the briefing, each matching a section of the written analysis in condensed form. The first states the decision question. Three slides cover the problem, what naloxone does and the evidence, with sources in the notes. A slide explains why a gap remains despite recent changes, and another summarizes the stakeholder stakeholder map in a sentence. Two slides present the options and their comparison in one table, and the last two give the recommendation, implementation steps and measures. Speaker notes are written as a script addressed to the director, so the recording sounds like a briefing. The script addresses the decision maker directly, opening with the question and closing with a request for approval.
Where the marks sit in the HCD 332 Module 3 rubric
The 25 points for the presentation are scored on a Canvas rubric. Recorded policy presentations are typically credited for a clear statement of the decision question, accurate and concise evidence, a fair summary of options and their comparison, a recommendation tied to the analysis, professional delivery and slide design and meeting technical requirements such as the mp4 format. Presentations lose credit when the presenter reads dense slides, when the recommendation is missing or unclear, when the video exceeds time limits or when audio quality makes it hard to follow. Because it is due with the final analysis, plan the recording after the written analysis is complete. A presentation that matches the written analysis in its recommendation and evidence shows the two products were built together.
HCD 332 Module 3 help from the desk
The commonest problem is a recording that reads the memo aloud. Draft a few spoken lines per slide and deliver them to the director, not to the screen. Put the recommendation early enough that the audience knows where you are heading. Use one comparison table rather than three option slides full of text. Check audio before recording and use a quiet room. Keep to any time limit Canvas sets. Export to mp4 as required. The desk can review your script for clarity if you share it. Show your face on camera if the instructions allow; it makes the briefing more persuasive.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Arizona State University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HCD 332 and BS in Health Care Administration and Policy sample papers
- HCD 332 Module 1: Health Policy Analysis Problem Statement
- HCD 332 Module 2: Health Policy Analysis: Naloxone Access
- HCD 400 Module 2: Module 2 Assignment: Navigating Scholarly Databases
- HCD 420 Module 5: Writing Workshop 5: Population Health, Population Health Management and Public Health
- HCD 404 Module 2: Evaluating Wearables Scenario Paper
- HCD 303 Module 2: Comparative Health System Analysis: Germany and the United States
HCD 332 Module 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HCD 332 Module 3 sample paper?
This page holds a full HCD 332 Module 3 sample: a ten-slide recorded briefing presenting a naloxone policy analysis, with a script in the speaker notes.
What format does the HCD 332 presentation use?
Students record themselves presenting their policy analysis and submit an mp4 video for grading.
How much is the HCD 332 presentation worth?
The recorded presentation is worth 25 points.
How should a policy recommendation be presented?
State the decision question, give essential evidence, compare options on the same criteria and end with a clear recommendation and next steps.
When is the HCD 332 presentation due?
In Week 6, with the final health policy analysis.